Channel
@nadembnzeadnjjar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,532subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001090976791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nadembnzeadnjjar |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nadembnzeadnjjar |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 7,532 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 7,545 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 7,542 | -16 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 7,558 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 7,561 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 7,563 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 7,567 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 7,573 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 7,578 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 7,574 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 7,576 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 7,579 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 7,579 | first reading |
60 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 60 (30 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,917 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🚨 خطبة الجمعة بعنوان : ( بعثة النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم رحمة للعالمين ) للإنس وللجن للعرب وللعجم للمسلم والكافر للمؤمن وللمنافق للحيوان والجماد 📍 في مسجد نبي الله سليمان عليه السلام 🎙 للشيخ / أبي زياد نديم نجار الشامي ┈••✵📚 🎙️ 📚 ✵••┈ 🎙️ قناة الشيخ الرسمية على التليجرام https://t.me/nadembnzeadnjjar
[ ليس كل من صعد المنبر، أو ألقى موعظة، أو محاضرة، عالم يرجع إليه ] قال العلامة عبد السلام بن برجس رحمه الله : في هذا الزمان اختل معيار كثير من العامة في تقييم العلماء فجعلوا كل من وعظ موعظة بليغة، أو ألقى محاضرات هادفة، أو خطب الجمعة مرتجلا عالما يرجع إليه في اﻹفتاء ويؤخذ العلم عنه، وهذه رزية مؤلمة، وظاهرة مزرية، تطاير شررها، وعم ضررها إذ هي من إسناد العلم إلى غير أهله، وإذا أسند اﻷمر إلى غير أهله فانتظر الساعة . …
قال العلامة مقبل الوادعي رحمه الله : نحن مدافعون عن السنة لا عن أنفسنا ، ونحن نسمع أناساً يسبوننا ، ولا نرد عليهم ... وليس لدينا وقت للمدافعة عن أنفسنا لكن عن السنة لو تعاضضنا بالضروس ، فلا نترك أحداً يتكلم في سنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم ، سواء أكان شيعياً ، أو صوفياً ، أم من الإخوان المسلمين. فنحن فداء للسنة ، وأعراضنا فداء للسنة . نصائح وفضائح
📕 كتاب الزهرة في رد غلو البردة ✍ العلامة أبو زيد عبدالرحمن بن محمد النتيفي رحمه الله
. [🚨] بدعة الإحتفال بالمولد النبوي [🚨] ❐ قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية -رَحِمَہُ اللّٰہُ- عن الإحتفال بالمولد: فإن هذا لم يفعله السلف، مع قيام المقتضى له وعدم المانع منه لو كان خيرًا. ولو كان هذا خيرًا محضًا، أو راجحًا لكان السلف -رَضِيَ اللّٰہُ عَنْہُم- أحق به منا، فإنهم كانوا أشد محبة لرسول اللّٰه ﷺ وتعظيمًا له منا، وهم على الخير أحرص. وإنما كمال محبته وتعظيمة في متابعته وطاعته واتباع أمره، وإحياء سنته باطنً…
. [🚨] بدعة الإحتفال بالمولد النبوي [🚨] ❐ قال الفاكهاني -رَحِمَہُ اللّٰہُ-: لا أعلم لهذا المولد أصلًا في كتاب ولا سنة، ولا ينقل عمله عن أحد من علماء الأمة الذين هم القدوة في الدين، المتمسكون بآثار المتقدمين، بل هو بدعة، أحدثها البطالون، وشهوة نفس اغتنى بها الأكالون. 📗 [المورد في عمل المولد: (صـ ٢)].
. [🚨] بدعة الإحتفال بالمولد النبوي [🚨] ❐ قال الشاطبي -رَحِمَہُ اللّٰہُ-: ”فمعلوم أن إقامة المولد على الوصف المعهود بين الناس بدعة محدثة، وكل بدعة ضلالة، فالإنفاق على إقامة البدعة لا يجوز، والوصية به غير نافذة“. 📓 [فتاوى الإمام الشاطبي: (٢٠٣-٢٠٤)، والمعيار المعرب: (٢٥٢/٩)].
قال العلامة عبيد الجابري رحمه الله : فاستبشروا خيراً يا أهل السنة فالباطل له صولة وله طفرة يستعر أحيانا كما تستعر النار في الهشيم ثم يخبوا بإذن الله وينطمر أهله وتصبح العاقبة للسنة وأهلها . تبصرة الخلف بشرح التحف في مذاهب السلف
📍 كلمة لإخوننا في الجزائر بعنوان ↶ « وقفات إيمانية ومنهجية مع حديث النبي تعرض الفتن على القلوب عوداً عوداً ... » صحيح مسلم 🎙️ للشيخ/ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي 📹 القناة الرسمية ↶ على: التليـــ↶ــجرام ...
📍 السُّـــ↶ــؤال: أحسن الله إليكم شيخنا الفاضل نريد ردكم على حملة الذهبي للباس الشرعي وخروج النساء للدعوة بالشوارع ؟ ┈••✵📚 🎙️ 📚 ✵••┈ 🎙️ قناة الشيخ الرسمية على التليجرام https://t.me/nadembnzeadnjjar
نصيحة قيمة ومؤثرة للشيخ العلامة عبدالله البخاري حفظه الله في التحذير من بعض السفاهات والحماقات وقد ختمها الشيخ بقوله: "إذا أنت لا تعي هذا الكلام فأنت لست طالب علم. خلاصة الكلام". من درس آداب المعلمين والمتعلمين يوم الخميس ٢٩/ جمادى الأولى/ ١٤٤٧هـ
📍 كلمة بعنوان " حقوق النبي ﷺ " 🎙 للشيخ الفاضل : أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي 📹 قناة الشيخ الرسمية ↶ على: التليـــ↶ــجرام ...
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @nadembnzeadnjjar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أبو زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي” (@nadembnzeadnjjar), 7,532 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadembnzeadnjjar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.