Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أبو زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي

Channel

أبو زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي

@nadembnzeadnjjar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,490subscribers

-89 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090976791
TypeChannel
Username@nadembnzeadnjjar
Descriptionالقناة الرسمية للشيخ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nadembnzeadnjjar

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,4647,5797,521.59 August 2026 — 7,579 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,579 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,576 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,574 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,578 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,573 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,567 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,563 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,561 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,558 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,542 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,545 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,532 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,503 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,487 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,500 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,481 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,487 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,479 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,481 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,464 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,471 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,493 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,490 subscribers7,4909 August 20268 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,447–7,596 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 01:477,490-3
5 Nov 2026, 00:107,493+22
2 Nov 2026, 09:577,471+7
30 Oct 2026, 03:567,464-17
26 Oct 2026, 18:297,481+2
20 Oct 2026, 18:167,479-8
17 Oct 2026, 18:087,487+6
15 Oct 2026, 02:067,481-19
11 Oct 2026, 16:587,500+13
5 Oct 2026, 04:587,487-16
26 Sept 2026, 18:187,503-29
17 Sept 2026, 23:567,532-13
13 Sept 2026, 10:417,545+3
3 Sept 2026, 15:227,542-16
31 Aug 2026, 08:067,558-3
28 Aug 2026, 18:047,561-2
26 Aug 2026, 00:117,563-4
22 Aug 2026, 17:567,567-6
19 Aug 2026, 00:537,573-5
15 Aug 2026, 16:517,578first reading

Engagement

104 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.08%
avg views ÷ 7,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
530
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
44
of 104 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held104 (30 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total16,965
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 19:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,680
Videos
≈555
Links
≈5,820

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 38m
Average length
31m 14s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 18:37 UTC69 viewsread 9 November 2026
File

📍 شرح « نونية ابن القيم» { الكافية الشافية في الإنتصار للفرقة الناجية } 📖 فصل : في ظهور الفرق المبين بين دعوة الرسل ودعوة المعطلين 📖 وفصل : فيما أعده الله من الإحسان للمتمسكين بالكتاب والسنة عند فساد الزمان 🎙️ للشيخ/ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي https://t.me/nadembnzeadnjjar

9 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC194 viewsread 9 November 2026
File

📍 شرح « نونية ابن القيم» { الكافية الشافية في الإنتصار للفرقة الناجية } 📖 فصل : في تعين الهجرة من الآراء والبدع إلى سنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم 🎙️ للشيخ/ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي https://t.me/nadembnzeadnjjar

8 Nov 2026, 05:17 UTC381 viewsread 9 November 2026
File

📍 شرح « نونية ابن القيم » { الكافية الشافية في الإنتصار للفرقة الناجية } 📖 فصل : في أن أهل الحديث هم أنصار رسول الله وخاصته 🎙️ للشيخ/ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي https://t.me/nadembnzeadnjjar

7 Nov 2026, 19:08 UTC434 viewsread 9 November 2026
File

📍الدرس { 1 } تفسير الجزء المفصل سورة ق 🎙 للشيخ / أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي 📹 القناة الرسمية ↶ على: التليـــ↶ــجرام ...

6 Nov 2026, 21:40 UTC554 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🚨 تذكير درس السبت إن شاء الله 📍 تفسير الجزء المفصل ↲ 📚 « سورة ق » 🎙️ للشيخ/ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي 📍 بعد صلاة العشاء رابط البث المباشر ↶ على: التليـــ↶ــجرام ..

6 Nov 2026, 21:19 UTC501 viewsread 9 November 2026
File

🚨 موعظة بليغة بعنوان ↶ « واتقوا يوماً ترجعون فيه إلى الله » 🎙️ للشيخ الفاضل : أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي رابط البث المباشر ↶ على: التليـــ↶ــجرام على: اليوتيـــ↶ــوب

6 Nov 2026, 17:13 UTC502 viewsread 9 November 2026
File

📍 كلمة لمركز السُنة في بريطانيا بعنوان « أهمية تدبر القرآن والحذر من الابتعاد عنه والهجران » 🎙️ للشيخ/ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي رابط القناة الرسمية ↶ على: التليـــ↶ــجرام ...

6 Nov 2026, 17:13 UTC507 viewsread 9 November 2026
File

📍 كلمة لطلاب مركز البخاري في ليفربول بعنوان « نصائح وتوجيهات » إن من الناس مفاتيح للخير مغاليق الشر 🎙️ للشيخ/ أبي زياد نديم بن زياد نجارالشامي رابط القناة الرسمية ↶ على: التليـــ↶ــجرام ...

Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @nadembnzeadnjjar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@nadembnzeadnjjar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 November 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @nadembnzeadnjjar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
45 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة ليبيا التأصيلية 🇱🇾
@libya_salafy · 33,183
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
عرفات بن حسن المحمدي
@Arafatbinhassan · 29,489
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
قناة ميراث الأنبياء
@Miraathalanbeyaa · 23,781
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
قناة فضيلة الشيخ أ.د. عبد الله البخاري
@dr_elbukhary · 37,553
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
المجالس القرآنية
@majals_quran · 28,108
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أبو زياد نديم بن زياد نجار الشامي” (@nadembnzeadnjjar), 7,490 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadembnzeadnjjar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.