Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الصفحة الرسمية للشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس

Channel

الصفحة الرسمية للشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس

@shnizaralabbas

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,353subscribers

-110 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001022523373
TypeChannel
Username@shnizaralabbas
Descriptionshnizaralabbas
CreatedBetween 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/shnizaralabbas

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,3539,4659,4095 August 2026 — 9,463 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,454 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,462 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,460 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,465 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,463 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,462 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,458 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,465 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,450 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,415 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,407 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,404 subscribers26 September 2026 — 9,396 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,380 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,375 subscribers17 October 2026 — 9,367 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,359 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,361 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,365 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,355 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,357 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,353 subscribers5 August 20267 November 2026
23 measurements spanning 93 days, net -110. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,336–9,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 04:069,353-4
4 Nov 2026, 00:359,357+2
1 Nov 2026, 10:449,355-10
29 Oct 2026, 09:479,365+4
23 Oct 2026, 16:089,361+2
20 Oct 2026, 18:309,359-8
17 Oct 2026, 19:399,367-8
14 Oct 2026, 10:389,375-5
11 Oct 2026, 03:379,380-16
26 Sept 2026, 10:429,396-8
17 Sept 2026, 12:229,404-3
13 Sept 2026, 09:409,407-8
9 Sept 2026, 22:409,415-35
4 Sept 2026, 20:399,450-15
31 Aug 2026, 21:049,465+7
28 Aug 2026, 17:499,458-4
25 Aug 2026, 10:349,462-1
22 Aug 2026, 13:069,463-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:169,465+5
12 Aug 2026, 09:449,460first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 9,353 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,690
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held61 (5 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total48,409
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 22:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
323
Videos
70
Links
937

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31m 18s
Average length
7m 50s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (27.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 18:01 UTC449 viewsread 8 November 2026

📌 [مِن مقالةٍ قديمةٍ في الرد على بعض أفراخ الحدادية المتجددة وبيان شيءٍ مِن صفاتهم وما أحدثوه لِدفع النَّقد والجَرح] «...ثم أنبِّه على أمرٍ مهمٍ وصفةٍ قبيحةٍ ملازمةٍ لأهل الأهواء والبدع يسلكونها ويرفعون رايتها المنكوسة إذا رَدَّ أهلُ السنة علماء السلفية وطلابهم عليهم وعلى أخطائهم- نصحاً لله ولدينه ولعباد الله عموماً ولهم خصوصاً-؛ بدل أن يرجعوا للحق ويتوبوا إلى الله ويبيِّنوا أخطاءهم التي ضلَّلوا بها من ضلَّلوا يتركو…

25 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈3,320 viewsread 8 November 2026

ولذا أكرِّر الوصاة لكل طلاب العلم بالتأصيل العلمي المنهجي ودراسة المنهج السلفي بصدقٍ ودقةٍ، والاستفادة القصوى من ميراث العلامة الربيع وبقية أهل العلم -رحمة الله عليهم جميعاً-، وكلما تعلَّم الطلاب هذه العلوم وتعمَّقوا فيها وهضموها وأدرَكوها استبان لهم ِبحول الله وقوَّته وفضله- طريقَ الحق وأهله وما يخالفه مِن طرق الباطل، وظَهَر لهم وانكشَف حقيقة منهج البخاري وحزبه المنحرف وكيف جَمعوا بين الجهل والهوى والتناقضات والكذب …

25 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC≈3,140 viewsread 8 November 2026

📌 [فــائدةٌ وتعليـــقٌ] • قال شيخنا العلامة ربيع بن هادي المدخلي -رحمه الله-: «لو فَرَضْنا أن ابن باز والألباني استمرَّا على التزكية إلى أن ماتا، وما عندهم إلا هذه التزكية، هل يَلزم الناس أن يأخذوا بتزكيتهم ويُغمِضوا أعينهم ويُقفِلوا عقولهم عن أخطاء فلان وفلان الذين زكاهم الألباني أو ابن باز؟! الأخطاء واضحة والجرح واضح، فهل يجوز لمسلمٍ أن يتعلق بتزكية فلان وفلان والجرح واضحٌ في هذا المُزكَّى؟!». الإجابات الجلية عن …

21 Oct 2026, 11:29 UTC≈3,170 viewsread 8 November 2026

⭕️ (جديـــد).. 📌 كَشفُ حقيقةِ فرعِ الحزبِ الجديدِ بفلسطين 🔹وقفاتٌ مع صوتية أسعد الزعتري🔹 «ما بَيْنَ الجهلِ والمُجازَفةِ والانحرافِ والتعصُّبِ الحزبيِّ، والنَّفَسِ والتأصيلِ الخارجيِّ الحداديِّ».. ✍ لفضيلة الشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس -حفظه الله ورعاه- 📨 لتحميل المقال (pdf): https://t.me/shnizaralabbas/2258 🌍 الصفحة الرسمية للشيخ على التلجرام: telegram.me/shnizaralabbas

21 Oct 2026, 04:55 UTC≈2,830 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

متى يكون الجهاد فرض عينٍ في زمننا هذا؟! - جواب الشيخ العلّامة محمد بن صالح العثيمين رحمه الله

21 Oct 2026, 04:53 UTC≈2,490 viewsread 8 November 2026
Video

هل القتال دفاعاً عن الوطن جهادٌ في سبيل الله؟! - جواب الشيخ العلّامة محمد بن صالح العثيمين رحمه الله

20 Oct 2026, 20:56 UTC≈2,730 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

📌(متجدِّد) 📁 ملفٌّ شاملٌ لجميع كتابات وصوتيات فضيلة الشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس -حفظه الله ورعاه- المتعلِّقة بحرب (الكرامة) والأوضاع الحالية لبلاد السودان -وقاها الله من كل سوءٍ ومكروه-. 🔗 حمِّل فهرس روابط المواد من هنا: https://t.me/shnizaralabbas/2254

20 Oct 2026, 04:07 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 8 November 2026

🗂️ سلسلة مقتطفات من المقالات (٤) 📌 قال فضيلة الشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس -حفظه الله ورعاه-: قال شيخنا العلَّامة ربيع بن هادي المدخلي -حفظه الله- في كتابه عون الباري (٢٢٢/٢): "...إذا كان القتال بين إمام حقٍّ وبين خارجٍ عليه يريد الفساد فهذا ليس مِن الفتنة في شيءٍ، إذا قاتلتَ مع إمام حقٍّ وخالفَه أناسٌ وخَرجوا عليه يريدون دنيا أو عندهم عقائد فاسدة يريدون التخلص من هذا الحق، فهذا ليس فتنةً؛ لأنك تنصُر حقَّاً على باطلٍ …

18 Oct 2026, 14:13 UTC≈2,260 viewsread 8 November 2026

📌 [حرب السودان (الكرامة) حربٌ شرعيَّةٌ شريفةٌ رَغم أَنفِك يا زعتري والبخاري وحزبه] -«١»- إنَّ الزعتري كعادته (وعادة البخاري وحزبه) لبَّسَ وقَلَّب حقيقة الأمر؛ فالسلفيون لم يُطالِبوا أحداً ابتداءً بأن يتكلم تجاه حرب السودان ولا حتى أن يَدْعو بدعاءٍ ولا مُناصَرةٍ؛ لأننا على يقينٍ تامٍّ بأننا -ولله الحمد- على الحق، لكن ما حَمَل السلفيين على مُطالَبة البخاري بالكلام والبيان: • أنه تكلم وقرَّر باطلاً ومخالَفةً شرعيةً وا…

18 Oct 2026, 14:13 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 8 November 2026

مَن هو أدرى وأعلم وأوعى وأنصح للشباب السلفي ومصلحتهم ومصلحة هذه الدعوة السلفية العظيمة؟! البخاري اللعوب أم العلامة الإمام الربيع؟! هذا -وغيره- يؤكِّد كل تأكيدٍ أنَّ الزعتري ومَن معه على خُطى البخاري وحزبه بكل عمايةٍ وهوىً وعصبيةٍ.. ولا ندري يا زعتري هل تم شراؤكم بثمنٍ بخسٍ كغيركم مِن العملاء المرتزقة كدعاة عدن وحزبهم؟!! وهل وجَّهكم البخاري يا زعتري بأمورٍ أخرى تكاتمتم عليها؟!! أَم وجَّهكم بالتحزُّب البغيض إليه وجنَّ…

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @shnizaralabbas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

عرفات بن حسن المحمدي
@Arafatbinhassan · 29,489
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
قناة فضيلة الشيخ أ.د. عبد الله البخاري
@dr_elbukhary · 37,558
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 1 September 2026
قناة ليبيا التأصيلية 🇱🇾
@libya_salafy · 33,183
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
قناة ميراث الأنبياء
@Miraathalanbeyaa · 23,781
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الصفحة الرسمية للشيخ نزار بن هاشم العباس” (@shnizaralabbas), 9,353 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shnizaralabbas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.