Channel
@anon_prok
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
38,494subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001345423158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anon_prok |
| Description | Истории, частные наблюдения и юридические заметки Чат @bprok4 Связь: @Prokurorhelp_bot Реклама: https://telega.in/channels/anon_prok/card/?r=J5D9P_ci РКН: https://clck.ru/3FCzoy |
| Created | 23 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anon_prok |
Recorded in 2019 as “Анонимный прокурор” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 38,494 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 38,493 | +11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 38,482 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 38,474 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 38,479 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 38,484 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 38,487 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (9 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 162,480 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anon_prok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Судья Самарского облсуда ушел в отставку на фоне проверки его активов Квалификационная коллегия судей Самарской области приняла отставку Александра Шилова, который до июля исполнял обязанности председателя Самарского областного суда. Ранее материалы о возможном использовании им служебного положения в личных целях были направлены в Генеральную прокуратуру для подготовки антикоррупционного иска. Решение об отставке Ш…
Posted without readable text
Не работает телега? Наш канал есть в другом мессенджере https://max.ru/anon_prok
Верховный суд: формальный договор продажи автомобиля не исключает его конфискации Суд обязан установить фактического владельца автомобиля, использованного при повторном управлении транспортным средством в состоянии опьянения, даже если уголовное дело рассматривается в особом порядке. При этом выяснение принадлежности машины не является изменением предъявленного обвинения, следует из определения Верховного суда РФ. …
Пенсионер из Самарской области вместо миллионов передал курьеру мошенников нарезанные газеты 77-летний житель Самарской области вовремя понял, что стал целью мошенников, и решил переиграть аферистов: вместо требуемых 2,4 млн рублей он передал приехавшей за деньгами курьеру пакет с нарезанными страницами газет и журналов. Теперь предполагаемой участнице преступной схемы предстоит суд. Как сообщили 6 августа в прокур…
Верховный суд отказался пересматривать приговор, который, предположительно, мог быть написан с помощью ИИ ⚖️ История началась в Краснодарском крае. Ейский городской суд вынес приговор в отношении двух бывших полицейских к семи годам лишения свободы по делу о получении взятки. Однако внимание адвокатов привлекли не только выводы суда, но и необычный стиль документа. 🤖 В тексте встречались выражения вроде «плеяда адв…
Когда перед увольнением передаешь все новому сотруднику (с) чат
Прокуратура проверит активы экс-судьи после выявления признаков фиктивного развода Председатель Верховного суда РФ Игорь Краснов поручил направить в Генеральную прокуратуру материалы для подготовки антикоррупционного иска в отношении бывшего судьи Октябрьского районного суда Новороссийска Манолиса Керасова. Об этом сообщила пресс-служба Верховного суда. Поводом для обращения стали результаты проверки, в ходе которо…
Photo, posted without a caption
Жесть какая https://t.me/anon_prok_press/24787
Женщину, подавшую иск к прокурору, оштрафовали за изъятие материалов из дела Инцидент произошел 13 января 2026 года в одном из районных судов Красноярска. В тот день рассматривался административный иск к прокурору. Перед началом заседания секретарь предоставила заявительнице для ознакомления письменные возражения представителя прокуратуры. Изучив документ, заявительница не вернула его сотруднику суда, а забрала с с…
КС: нужно обжаловать решение следователя, а не бездействие надзирающего прокурора Бездействие прокурора, связанное с надзором за расследованием уголовного дела, не может быть самостоятельным предметом судебной проверки в порядке статьи 125 УПК РФ. Потерпевшие вправе обжаловать непосредственно решение или действия следователя, которые нарушают их права либо затрудняют доступ к правосудию. На это указал Конституционны…
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @anon_prok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 151,475 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бывший прокурор” (@anon_prok), 38,494 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anon_prok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.