СК возбудил уголовные дела в отношении трех бывших судей Следственный комитет возбудил уголовные дела в отношении бывшей председателя Анжеро-Судженского городского суда Кемеровской области Елены Степанцовой, а также двух бывших судей Арбитражного суда Иркутской области - Наталии Поздняковой и Елены Рукавишниковой. Степанцовой вменяют два эпизода мошенничества при получении выплат в особо крупном размере (ч. 4 ст. 1…

Channel
Бывший прокурор
@anon_prok
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
38,384subscribers
-103 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001345423158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @anon_prok |
| Description | Истории, частные наблюдения и юридические заметки Чат @bprok4 Связь: @Prokurorhelp_bot Реклама: https://telega.in/channels/anon_prok/card/?r=J5D9P_ci РКН: https://clck.ru/3FCzoy |
| Created | 23 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/anon_prok |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 28% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Анонимный прокурор” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 38,384 | -21 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 38,405 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 38,417 | -18 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 38,435 | -12 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 38,447 | +4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 38,443 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 38,465 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 38,479 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:39 | 38,483 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 38,492 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 38,503 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 38,513 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 38,518 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 38,521 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 38,531 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 38,528 | +50 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 38,478 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 38,481 | -12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 38,493 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 38,497 | first reading |
Engagement
76 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.0%
- avg views ÷ 38,384 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,760
- 31 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 31
- of 76 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 76 (9 July 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 178,430 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 227
- Videos
- 65
- Links
- 729
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 76 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anon_prok. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 1.32%
- 1 of 76 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 8,030
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 7,970
- over 75 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| CQH36pWzJqDgH9TenVjfmjvdUx571MHSJNKNP99KaeMfi2 | 1 | 27 August 2026 | 27 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Суд обратил в доход государства недвижимость на территории детского центра «Смена» в Анапе Анапский городской суд по иску Генпрокуратуры передал в собственность Российской Федерации объекты недвижимости, находящиеся на территории Всероссийского детского центра «Смена» и рядом с ним в Анапе Краснодарского края. Имущество принадлежало бывшим должностным лицам, членам их семей и связанным с ними структурам, сообщила об…
Posted without readable text
Мосгорсуд пересмотрел решение о возврате поддельного диплома экс-следователю СК Московский городской суд удовлетворил представление прокуратуры на приговор бывшему следователю Главного следственного управления Следственного комитета России по Санкт-Петербургу Сергею Кабанцу. Ранее его признали виновным в использовании заведомо поддельного диплома о высшем образовании и назначили шесть месяцев ограничения свободы. П…
Не работает телега? Наш канал есть в другом мессенджере https://max.ru/anon_prok
В игре Районный прокурор растет количество игроков, проверок и выявленных нарушений. Всё больше людей получают высший чин и не останавливаются на нём В этот прекрасный воскресный день рассказываем об обновлениях в игре Районный Прокурор: - Добавлена анимация; - Прорисован каждый кабинет, куда можно заходить за улучшениями; - Даже после достижения чина "Действительный государственный советник" можно продолжить играт…
Posted without readable text
"Да, ты абсолютно прав! Нельзя приговаривать человека к пожизненному лишению свободы за кражу шуруповёрта. Хочешь, я исправлю резолютивную часть приговора и добавлю туда несколько подходящих эмодзи? ⚖️🔧✨" https://t.me/ImlawIT/592
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Краснодарский краевой суд утвердил изъятие имущества экс-судьи Елены Хахалевой Краснодарский краевой суд отклонил апелляционные жалобы по делу об обращении в доход государства имущества бывшей судьи Елены Хахалевой, ее родственников и связанных с ними лиц. Решение о конфискации активов вступило в законную силу, сообщает. Сама Хахалева остается в международном розыске. Иск Генпрокуратуры поступил в суд в апреле 2026…
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @anon_prok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@anon_prok edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,7568 postsДихотомия права
@dihotomya · 13,8695 postsДоктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,9415 postsТрудовые ссоры
@trud_inspector · 11,6035 postsЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ
@persontaxes · 31,4884 postsМедицинский юрист Иван Печерей
@pravomedapologists · 16,8324 postsНедвижимость и закон
@pravonadom1 · 29,2284 postsВсё про ЭДО
@roseuorg · 13,6344 postsПраво 🆘
@pravosos · 15,9503 postsPRO Семейные права
@prosemuy · 20,3113 postsПрокурорские будни
@anon_prok_press · 20,5742 postsБАНДИТСКАЯ САМАРА
@banditskayasamara · 28,8662 postsНикита Ивкин | Юрист
@nikita_ivkin · 15,4872 postsТрудовик⚒
@trudovi_k · 13,4642 postsOFD24 | ККТ, Маркировка, ЕГАИС, Меркурий, Честный ЗНАК, ДМДК, СБП, ЦТО, ОФД, 1С
@ofd24 · 20,7721 postПенсионный Фонд РФ
@pensionfondrf · 15,5451 postНовости права
@pravorus · 17,0251 postPrivacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,9181 postНовости РАПСИ
@rapsinewsru · 15,0391 postПрочёл в законе
@ReadInLaw · 12,4101 postСоюз военных юристов
@SVJurist · 5,6431 postОхрана труда по факту
@trud_fact · 18,4341 postПолезное для Кадровика
@trud_krut · 23,5141 postЗаконодатель
@zaconodatel · 21,7771 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@anon_prok_press · 20,5743 postsIT юрист
@ImlawIT · 12,5232 postsДихотомия права
@dihotomya · 13,8691 postДоктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,9411 postКадровику
@kadroviku · 45,1411 postКонституционный Суд
@ksrf_ru · 28,0681 postНикита Ивкин | Юрист
@nikita_ivkin · 15,4871 postOFD24 | ККТ, Маркировка, ЕГАИС, Меркурий, Честный ЗНАК, ДМДК, СБП, ЦТО, ОФД, 1С
@ofd24 · 20,7721 postОхрана труда
@ohranatruda_official · 25,1331 postНародный Юрист
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,7561 postЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ
@persontaxes · 31,4881 postПоворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,8061 postМедицинский юрист Иван Печерей
@pravomedapologists · 16,8321 postНедвижимость и закон
@pravonadom1 · 29,2281 postPrivacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,9181 postПрочёл в законе
@ReadInLaw · 12,4101 postВсё про ЭДО
@roseuorg · 13,6341 postСУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА
@sudpraktik · 49,0391 postОхрана труда по факту
@trud_fact · 18,4341 postТрудовые ссоры
@trud_inspector · 11,6031 postТрудовик⚒
@trudovi_k · 13,4641 postНовости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,8831 postЗаконодатель
@zaconodatel · 21,7771 postЗакупки и тендеры по 44-ФЗ, 223-ФЗ
@zakupki44fz · 48,8911 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@anon_prok_press · 20,574#1
@genprocrf · 37,286#2
@operobzor · 95,640#3
@buvshuy_oper · 91,667#4
@pravo_pravo · 57,676#5
@doktorprava · 20,941#6
@vesty_vedomstv · 9,247#7
@ksrf_ru · 28,068#8
@mosoblproc · 29,319#9
@procspb · 7,405#10
@damagesanatomy · 8,483#11
@prokzabkray · 2,498#12
@akaloy · 53,269#13
@legal_report · 9,150#14
@zakon_news · 16,014#15
@upsvk · 7,128#16
@legalreport · 4,460#17
@chuv_prok · 4,221#18
@mmtproc · 3,279#19
@law_365 · 11,012#20
@stavropolproc26 · 4,167#21
@exsled · 41,285#22
@mash · 3,110,586#23
@bazabazon · 1,565,293#24
@bbbreaking · 1,974,402#25
@ejdailyru · 671,042#26
@vsrf_ru · 59,883#27
@komitetpolk · 7,603#28
@shot_shot · 1,265,657#29
@povorotnapravo · 50,806#30
@readovkanews · 2,014,901#31
@fsb_boutique · 35,157#32
@moscowproc · 31,348#33
@sledcom_press · 95,938#34
@supreme_crime · 15,200#35
@ruslaw · 25,361#36
@sneakerscourt · 6,308#37
@russicaru · 430,325#38
@operdrain · 125,664#39
@criminalru · 117,562#40
@loaderfromSVO · 40,385#41
@Hinshtein · 215,712#42
@rapsinewsru · 15,039#43
@SIL0VIKI · 183,547#44
@zamuprav · 71,211#45
@proc_23 · 9,736#46
@fparf · 15,149#47
@BlackAudit · 52,169#48
@mytar_rf · 27,487#49
@bmbex · 2,384#50
@alternativapravo · 5,319#51
@prosemuy · 20,311#52
@moscowcourts · 34,898#53
@sarprok · 5,899#54
@advgazeta · 10,485#55
@NP_Biblioteka · 12,008#56
@sztproc · 3,462#57
@yrisprudencia · 23,661#58
@library_lawyer · 25,605#59
@genprocsfo · 3,242#60
@ficenter · 3,609#61
@PogonyGalstuky · 44,838#62
@pravomos · 6,579#63
@shizo_psy · 2,839#64
@prok_lenobl · 3,935#65
@gkhvsem · 40,450#66
@infocentrskrf · 68,758#67
@gprfdfo · 2,612#68
@privlawlib · 33,339#69
@digital_law_trends · 13,485#70
@pravosos · 15,950#71
@yustigram · 30,864#72
@garantrss · 14,296#73
@LawFirms · 21,544#74
@vorontsova63ru · 31,076#75
@fpa_rf · 4,010#76
@anons_law · 13,041#77
@dihotomya · 13,869#78
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,893#79
@policeforum · 9,551#80
@ENews112 · 364,796#81
@you_lawyers · 13,755#82
@advomemes · 1,855#83
@zakonoproekty · 6,524#84
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@anon_prok_press · 20,574
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
@genprocrf · 37,286
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
@buvshuy_oper · 91,667
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
@exsled · 41,285
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
@ksrf_ru · 28,068
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
@vsrf_ru · 59,883
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@yustigram · 30,864
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
@ruslaw · 25,361
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@gkhvsem · 40,450
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
@povorotnapravo · 50,806
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@yrisprudencia · 23,661
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
@mytar_rf · 27,487
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бывший прокурор” (@anon_prok), 38,384 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anon_prok.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.