Юридический компас в необъятном море правовых актов:
краткая выжимка из оригинальных текстов со ссылкой на первоисточник.
24/7🤳S🛟S📲 @NikitaVarushkin
Регистрация РКН:https://clck.ru/3FfYdf
Купить рекламу:https://telega.in/c/pravosos
#право #закон #суд
Created
23 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 96 days, net -302. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,761–16,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 01:31
15,806
-3
8 Nov 2026, 16:46
15,809
-2
7 Nov 2026, 10:34
15,811
-2
6 Nov 2026, 08:16
15,813
-6
5 Nov 2026, 08:08
15,819
-8
4 Nov 2026, 04:01
15,827
-1
3 Nov 2026, 06:46
15,828
-1
2 Nov 2026, 07:36
15,829
-3
1 Nov 2026, 07:08
15,832
-4
31 Oct 2026, 04:51
15,836
-8
29 Oct 2026, 10:06
15,844
-6
28 Oct 2026, 09:56
15,850
-3
27 Oct 2026, 11:25
15,853
-3
26 Oct 2026, 12:45
15,856
-5
25 Oct 2026, 09:46
15,861
-4
24 Oct 2026, 13:18
15,865
-2
23 Oct 2026, 11:19
15,867
-4
22 Oct 2026, 08:45
15,871
-1
20 Oct 2026, 22:46
15,872
-3
19 Oct 2026, 20:07
15,875
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.08%
avg views ÷ 15,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
645
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.847%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
96 (24 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
20,654
Reactions total
175
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈175
Videos
≈11
Links
≈2,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 55s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
436 reactions across 91 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
245
56.2%
❤
84
19.3%
🔥
26
5.96%
💩
20
4.59%
👎
17
3.90%
🤮
11
2.52%
🎃
6
1.38%
🖕
6
1.38%
🙈
4
0.917%
🤡
4
0.917%
🙏
3
0.688%
👌
2
0.459%
⚡
1
0.229%
🌭
1
0.229%
👏
1
0.229%
😁
1
0.229%
🙉
1
0.229%
🙊
1
0.229%
🤣
1
0.229%
🤷♂
1
0.229%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 96 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pravosos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 96 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.04%
1 of 96 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
719
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
713
over 95 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqDgH9TejzNF6hzer1qweLEwuNg45Q5Cwr3AYS
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (3.13%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⚖️Однократная неудачная попытка вручения в нерабочий праздничный день является ненадлежащим извещением о судебном заседании несмотря на последовавшее ходатайство об отложении судебного заседания
В соответствии со статьей 112 Трудового кодекса Российской Федерации, нерабочими праздничными днями в Российской Федерации являются, в том числе 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 и 8 января - новогодние каникулы; 7 января - Рождество Христов…
🏛️Бремя неблагоприятных последствий включения в трудовой договор условия о выходном пособии при увольнении, размер которого экономически неразумен, несет исключительно руководитель юридического лица
В силу статьи 277 Трудового кодекса Российской Федерации за совершение виновных действий, повлекших убытки юридического лица, руководитель организации (в том числе унитарного предприятия) несет полную материальную ответс…
⚖️В условиях современного уровня медицины наличие медицинских недостатков не повлекших смерть пациентки не освобождают клинику от компенсации морального вреда родственнику погибшей пациентки
Эксперты пришли к выводу о том, что между недостатками, допущенными при оказании медицинской помощи <данные изъяты>, и наступившим неблагоприятным исходом заболевания в виде смерти пациентки, прямая причинно-следственная связь н…
🏛️Иск госоргана о признании отсутствующим права собственности у гражданина на земельный участок не подлежит удовлетворению, если гражданин являлся добросовестным приобретателем, законно построил жилой дом и(или) выявил пропуск срока исковой давности о котором заявил
Постановление КС РФ 29.10.2026 № 63-П
Право🆘 в MAX || VK || Дзен
Донат / Буст / Консультации
Правильный ответ - Да 👏
⚖️Закон о защите прав потребителей может распространяться на правоотношения с участием самозанятых
В Постановлении от 30 мая 2024 года № 27-П Конституционный Суд Российской Федерации отмечал, что физические лица, применяющие введенный названным Федеральным законом специальный налоговый режим, нередко обозначаются в качестве «самозанятых» и что содержание действующих правовых актов как законо…
⚖️Отсутствие прямой причинно-следственной связи между несоблюдением водителем ПДД и наступившими последствиями в виде ДТП не исключает преступных действий водителя, если он превышал допустимую скорость движения
☝️Первый кассационный суд общей юрисдикции при рассмотрении дела по кассационной жалобе защитника осужденного Тонояна A.M. пришел к выводу о необходимости отмены состоявшихся в отношении него судебных решений…
⚖️Обострение международных отношений и введение санкций могут стать основанием для снижения неустойки
По настоящему делу до вынесения решения генеральный директор ООО «Турри-Дизайн» Калашян К.А. в отзыве на уточнённое исковое заявление ходатайствовал о снижении штрафа на основании статьи 333 Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации, в котором ссылался на необходимость установления судом баланса прав и законных инте…
Приобретательная давность применима к земельным участкам, находящимся в государственной собственности
Отказывая в удовлетворении исковых требований, суд первой инстанции исходил из того, что фактическое пользование истцами земельным участком, находящимся в государственной собственности, не может являться основанием для приобретения на него права собственности в силу приобретательной давности, так как он не является …
Вижу вашу негативную реакцию на посты про канал в Max.
Как понимаете, эта мера вынужденная и продиктована нестабильной работой многих VPN-сервисов и возможностью уйти от их зависимости.
Отмечу, что подписка на канал в Max это не только альтернативный вариант получения свежей судебной практики, но и рабочий инструмент для подборки судебных решений под вашу ситуацию.
За 6 лет существования на канале накопилось огром…
⚖️Продажа имущества аффилированному с лизингодателем лицу при отсутствии доказательств согласованных действий не свидетельствуют о недобросовестности сделки
Относительно заявленных доводов о занижении стоимости возвращенных предметов лизинга суд округа соглашается с выводом апелляционного суда о том, что сам по себе факт реализации части имущества аффилированному с лизингодателем лицу и отсутствие открытых торгов не…
⚖️Установление факта извещения собственника для составления акта о заливе имеет существенное значение для дела по взысканию ущерба, причиненного заливом помещения
Как указал эксперт, факт залива зафиксирован в отчете об оценке № 24-0820.3.1, вместе с тем, к отчету об оценке приложен акт осмотра от 05.10.2023, в котором не указаны причины и дата причинения повреждений.
Вопреки требованиям статьи 71 АПК РФ, акт осмот…
👍5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @pravosos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 42 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Народный Юрист @PeopleIsLawyer · 23,532 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ @yrisprudencia · 23,569 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
Законодатель @zaconodatel · 21,486 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Юрист объясняет l Евгений Фурин @furinlaw · 47,961 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Юридические советы * Законы @yurist_tgm · 21,313 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
PRO Семейные права @prosemuy · 20,265 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
ЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ @persontaxes · 31,358 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право @ruslaw · 25,202 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Юридические Тонкости @sivakovairina · 109,170 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Налоговые споры @nalogi_sud · 23,344 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Юридическая консультация Геннадия Ефремова @sovetiadvokata · 46,508 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Доктор Права @doktorprava · 20,844 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Юристы31/Online @yurist_group31 · 35,757 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Прокурорские будни @anon_prok_press · 20,575 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
Бывший прокурор @anon_prok · 38,119 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Полезное для Кадровика @trud_krut · 23,345 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Право 🆘” (@pravosos), 15,806 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pravosos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.