Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Суд | Юрист | Закон

Channel

Суд | Юрист | Закон

@zakon_yurist

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24,953subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001381806079
TypeChannel
Username@zakon_yurist
DescriptionЮридические советы, практика, законы По вопросам рекламы пишите @kira_polit Зарегистрирован в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6799eb22063b2d23742484ce
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zakon_yurist

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@zakon_yurist/2286 · this entry1 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC@yurist_tgm/17731 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@zakon_yurist/2287 · this entry3 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC@yurist_tgm/17743 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@zakon_yurist/2289 · this entry7 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC@yurist_tgm/17767 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC1.00under a minute
@zakon_yurist/2296 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC@yurist_tgm/178321 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@zakon_yurist/2297 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC@yurist_tgm/178423 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@zakon_yurist/2298 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC@yurist_tgm/178525 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@yurist_tgm20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (20–0)
@yurist_sudi20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@yurist_sudi (20–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 20 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @yurist_sudi. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

24,95325,01024,981.56 August 2026 — 25,010 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,009 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,008 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,007 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,005 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,004 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,003 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,000 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,999 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,998 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,996 subscribers23 August 2026 — 24,994 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,989 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,987 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,986 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,984 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,983 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,982 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,981 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,980 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,979 subscribers4 September 2026 — 24,976 subscribers6 September 2026 — 24,975 subscribers9 September 2026 — 24,966 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,965 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,964 subscribers15 September 2026 — 24,963 subscribers17 September 2026 — 24,962 subscribers19 September 2026 — 24,960 subscribers26 September 2026 — 24,953 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 51 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,944–25,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 19:2224,953-7
19 Sept 2026, 17:1424,960-2
17 Sept 2026, 04:4124,962-1
15 Sept 2026, 03:3824,963-1
13 Sept 2026, 14:1924,964-1
11 Sept 2026, 20:1924,965-1
9 Sept 2026, 11:5524,966-9
6 Sept 2026, 06:1724,975-1
4 Sept 2026, 00:5724,976-3
2 Sept 2026, 15:3324,979-1
1 Sept 2026, 16:5824,980-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:0824,981-1
30 Aug 2026, 13:1424,982-1
29 Aug 2026, 09:4524,983-1
28 Aug 2026, 09:0424,984-2
27 Aug 2026, 07:3824,986-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:4224,987-2
25 Aug 2026, 01:3324,989-5
23 Aug 2026, 11:0824,994-2
20 Aug 2026, 14:4224,996first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 24,953 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,200
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held46 (29 June 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total182,800
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 23:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
833
Videos
12
Links
161

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 22:57 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Арбитражный суд Москвы удовлетворил иск на 2 млрд рублей к «Торговый дом НЗНП» Арбитражный суд Москвы в полном объеме удовлетворил иск АО «Тренд» о взыскании с ООО «Торговый дом НЗНП», входящего в структуру Новошахтинского завода нефтепродуктов. Общая сумма задолженности по векселям, процентов и пени превысила 2 млрд руб. Соответствующие сведения содержатся в картотеке арбитражных дел. С требованием взыскать вексел…

24 Sept 2026, 22:09 UTC≈12,100 viewsread 27 September 2026

Вдовы умерших из-за травмы военных имеют право на получение двух пенсий КС РФ подтвердил право супругов военнослужащих, получивших военную травму и впоследствии скончавшихся из-за нее, на одновременное предоставление двух пенсионных выплат. Судебный акт опубликован на официальном сайте Суда (Постановление Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации от 22 сентября 2026 г. № 54-П "По делу о проверке конституционности ч…

22 Sept 2026, 22:12 UTC≈12,100 viewsread 27 September 2026

ВС РФ признал недействующим примерное положение о студенческом общежитии Поводом для этого послужил иск студента юридического вуза, которого выселили из студенческого общежития по одному из оснований, предусмотренных Примерными правилами внутреннего распорядка такого общежития (приложение к Примерному положению об общежитии), – в связи с длительным (более двух месяцев) отсутствием в общежитии без письменного предупр…

20 Sept 2026, 22:11 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Отец двух девочек пострадал в драке с соседом в Верхней Пышме Прокуратура Верхней Пышмы утвердила обвинительное заключение по уголовному делу в отношении 38‑летнего местного жителя. Ему вменяется пункт «г» части 2 статьи 112 УК РФ – умышленное причинение средней тяжести вреда здоровью, совершённое группой лиц, сообщает пресс-служба прокуратуры Свердловской области. По версии следствия, конфликт произошёл в ночь на 2…

19 Sept 2026, 01:27 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

ТФОМС не вправе взыскивать со СМО штраф в размере суммы неоплаты медпомощи ТФОМС не смог взыскать со СМО штраф в размере почти 120 000 руб. к связи с незаконным применением финансовых санкций к медорганизациям (Определение Верховного Суда РФ от 5 августа 2026 г. № 308-ЭС26-8712). В ходе проверки СМО ТФОМС обнаружил, что страховая, по результатам своего контроля, незаконно применила следующие санкции: финансовые санк…

16 Sept 2026, 23:00 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Прямая связь страданий с лечением для компенсации морального вреда не требуется Верховный Суд РФ пересмотрел дело о компенсации морального вреда пациенту в связи с неправильным лечением (Определение СКГД Верховного Суда РФ от 20 июля 2026 г. № 16-КГ26-15-К4). Суды трех инстанций установили, что в областной больнице истцу была некачественно проведена операция на позвоночнике (с установкой металлоконструкции). Впослед…

14 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Суд приговорил уроженца Бурятии к 18 годам лишения свободы за экстремизм 2-й Восточный окружной военный суд приговорил уроженца Бурятии к 18 годам лишения свободы за участие в террористической организации. Об этом сообщили в пресс-службе суда. Осужденный, находящийся за пределами России, с мая 2022 года участвовал в деятельности организации запрещенной в РФ организации. По данным суда, мужчина придерживался радикаль…

13 Sept 2026, 04:20 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Суд взыскал с курьера и дроппера в пользу Ларисы Долиной 114,4 млн руб Лефортовский районный суд города Москвы 8 сентября рассмотрел гражданское дело по иску Ларисы Долиной к двум участникам мошеннической схемы о возмещении вреда, причиненного преступлением. Требования пострадавшей от действий преступников певицы удовлетворены: суд взыскал солидарно с курьера и дроппера денежные средства в размере 114 120 000 руб. в…

10 Sept 2026, 22:27 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Суд взыскал с застройщика 81,4 млн рублей в бюджет Сочи за самовольную многоэтажку Краснодарский краевой суд оставил в силе решение Адлерского районного суда о взыскании с застройщика 81,4 млн руб. в пользу бюджета Сочи. Средства должны компенсировать ущерб, причиненный городу строительством 13-этажного многоквартирного дома на участке, предназначенном для индивидуального жилищного строительства. Об этом сообщает об…

8 Sept 2026, 23:34 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

ВС РФ станет контролировать единообразное применение судами его правовых позиций 4 сентября 2026 года вступили в силу поправки в законодательство, направленные на формирование дополнительных правовых средств обеспечения единообразия судебной практики (Федеральный конституционный закон от 4 августа 2026 г. № 3-ФКЗ). Так, с указанной даты в ч. 4 ст. 19 ФКЗ "О судебной системе Российской Федерации" уточнено, что Верхо…

7 Sept 2026, 05:51 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Суд Ростова вынес длительные сроки по делу о захвате заложников в СИЗО Южный окружной военный суд вынес приговор пятерым фигурантам дела о захвате заложников в следственном изоляторе Ростова-на-Дону в 2024 году. Об этом 4 сентября сообщили в пресс-службе суда. Подсудимые признаны виновными и приговорены к лишению свободы на сроки от 21 до 29 лет в колонии строгого режима. Троим из них также назначены штрафы в разме…

5 Sept 2026, 03:14 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

Поворот исполнения при отмене решения в апелляции допускается по любым требованиям Государственная гражданская служащая оспаривала увольнение и требовала восстановить ее на службе, взыскать денежное содержание за время вынужденного прогула, компенсацию морального вреда и судебные расходы (Определение СКГД Верховного Суда РФ от 20 июля 2026 г. № 16-КГ26-16-К4). Районный суд частично удовлетворил иск: признал незаконн…

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @zakon_yurist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Суд | Юрист | Закон” (@zakon_yurist), 24,953 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zakon_yurist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.