Channel
@yurist_sudi
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,208subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001170884956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yurist_sudi |
| Description | Юридические советы, практика, законы По вопросам рекламы пишите @kira_polit Зарегистрирован в РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6793821119290c0f9367c895 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yurist_sudi |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @yurist_sudi/2291 · this entry1 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC | @yurist_tgm/17731 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yurist_sudi/2292 · this entry3 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC | @yurist_tgm/17743 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yurist_sudi/2294 · this entry7 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC | @yurist_tgm/17767 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yurist_sudi/2301 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 13:41 UTC | @yurist_tgm/178321 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yurist_sudi/2302 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC | @yurist_tgm/178423 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yurist_sudi/2303 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC | @yurist_tgm/178525 Jul 2026, 06:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @yurist_tgm | 20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (20–0) |
| @zakon_yurist | 20 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (20–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @yurist_sudi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 22,208 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 22,209 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:21 | 22,212 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:40 | 22,213 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 22,215 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (29 June 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 177,130 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Суд арестовал тагильчанина, обвиняемого в финансировании террористов Суд арестовал жителя Нижнего Тагила, обвиняемого в финансировании террористической организации, сообщает объединенная пресс-служба судов. Ленинский районный суд Нижнего Тагила рассмотрел ходатайство следователя об избрании меры пресечения в отношении Ильи П. по ч. 1.1 ст. 205.1 УК РФ — «Содействие террористической деятельности в форме финансировани…
званы профессия и дата заключения договора, но не оплата, режим труда и другие условия. Похожий вопрос возникал и в другом споре. Работодатель просил разъяснить решение суда: уточнить дату оформления договора, распределение нагрузки, порядок прохождения медосмотра, вопрос испытательного срока, внесение записей в трудовую книжку, ведение табеля и действия при невыходе работника. Апелляция отказалась давать такие разъя…
ВС РФ защитил право сельского врача на выплату по программе "Земский доктор" Тройка судей Верховного Суда РФ пересмотрела дело о взыскании с сельского врача якобы "неотработанной" единовременной выплаты в 1 млн руб. по программе "Земский врач": врач заключил трудовой договор о своей работе - по основному месту работы на условиях полного рабочего дня, – в уральском селе (население - 6 000 человек) в феврале 2018 года…
Штрафы назначают за каждое нарушение при расследовании несчастного случая Кассационный суд общей юрисдикции отменил решения нижестоящих судов по делу о штрафах, наложенных на крупное промышленное предприятие по результатам расследования смертельного несчастного случая (Постановление Седьмого КСОЮ от 3 июля 2026 г. по делу № 16-2861/2026). Государственная инспекция труда выявила несколько нарушений требований охраны …
ООО оштрафовали за непредставление запрошенных налоговиками документов Налогоплательщик полагал, что запрошенные налоговым органом оборотно-сальдовые ведомости являются синтетическими регистрами бухгалтерского учета, их составление в обязательном порядке не предусмотрено ни нормами актов, регламентирующих ведение бухгалтерского учета, ни нормами НК РФ (Постановление АС Поволжского округа от 9 июня 2026 г. № Ф06-1529…
Онкодиспансер выплатит 100 тыс. из-за неверного диагноза и повторной операции За недооценку клинических данных, что повлекло сначала неверный диагноз, затем неверную тактику оперативного вмешательства, а потом – новую операцию, онкодиспансер выплатит пациентке компенсацию морального вреда. Неверная интерпретация диагностической информации и неверное лечение проявились следующим образом: после "плохой" маммографии па…
ИП оштрафовали на 400 тыс. руб. за иностранного продавца в нестационарной точке В 2026 году допустимая доля иностранных работников в розничной торговле в нестационарных торговых объектах и на рынках (код ОКВЭД 47.8) составляет 0%. Для юридических лиц и ИП, которые по этой статье отвечают как юридические лица, предусмотрен штраф от 800 тыс. до 1 млн руб. либо приостановление деятельности на срок от 14 до 90 суток. Пр…
Можно возобновлять, в том числе по жалобе потерпевшего с доводами о том, что срок давности не истек либо не подлежал применению; если уголовное дело прекращено, это обстоятельство само по себе еще не означает невозможность обнаружения новых данных по такому делу, их проверки и фиксации уголовно-процессуальными средствами. Поскольку в такой ситуации производство по уголовному делу не ведется, а обнаруженному лицу не г…
В Иркутске суд арестовал подростка, переехавшего обидчика на автомобиле Суд вынес решение об аресте 17-летнего подростка, переехавшего своего обидчика на автомобиле в центре Иркутска. Об этом 25 июля сообщила объединенная пресс-служба судов Иркутской области. По решению суда задержанный заключен под стражу на два месяца, по 21 сентября 2026 года включительно. По версии следствия, 19 июля возле ночного клуба между …
Суд признал незаконной вывеску кафе на латинице по иску Роспотребнадзора Городской суд рассмотрел иск Роспотребнадзора к ИП – хозяйке популярного кафе – о признании противоправными ее действий по размещению и демонстрации на иностранном языке информации, предназначенной для публичного ознакомления потребителей, а именно – вывески "CHAPLIN", которая содержит символы и слова на иностранном языке, без сопровождения пер…
Опыт сапера не дает права руководить промышленными взрывами без профобразования Верховный Суд РФ подтвердил законность требований пунктов 57 и 58 Правил безопасности при производстве, хранении и применении взрывчатых материалов промышленного назначения, согласно которым право на получение Единой книжки взрывника (ЕКВ) для руководства взрывными работами имеют лица с: высшим или средним профессиональным горнотехническ…
Федеральные суды планируют освободить от финансово-хозяйственной деятельности Председатель Верховного Суда РФ Игорь Краснов выступил с инициативой провести реформу системы управления финансами и хозяйством федеральных судов. Под его руководством Пленум ВС РФ подготовил пакет законопроектов, в которых предусматривается передача их функций по финансовому и материально-техническому обеспечению управлениям Судебного деп…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @yurist_sudi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,091,176 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адвокат | Прокурор | Суд | Закон” (@yurist_sudi), 22,208 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yurist_sudi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.