Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Судебный караульный

Channel

Судебный караульный

@karaulny_sud

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,518subscribers

+53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225133620
TypeChannel
Username@karaulny_sud
DescriptionАгрегатор судебной практики: обзоры, аналитика, комментарии. Реклама: @sud_karaul_bot или https://telega.in/c/karaulny_sud
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/karaulny_sud

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,38912,57412,481.512,5186 August 202615 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 102 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,361–12,602 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Nov 2026, 19:0812,518-4
10 Nov 2026, 06:0012,522+5
8 Nov 2026, 20:5912,517-7
7 Nov 2026, 13:1012,524-5
6 Nov 2026, 12:5812,529-3
5 Nov 2026, 16:1812,532-12
4 Nov 2026, 12:4812,544-3
3 Nov 2026, 09:4512,547-6
2 Nov 2026, 10:1812,553-7
1 Nov 2026, 12:2012,560-5
31 Oct 2026, 14:4812,565-2
30 Oct 2026, 16:1512,567-7
29 Oct 2026, 18:1812,574+6
28 Oct 2026, 18:4812,568+1
27 Oct 2026, 14:5712,567+5
26 Oct 2026, 14:4512,562+4
25 Oct 2026, 11:3812,558+2
24 Oct 2026, 12:0912,556+6
23 Oct 2026, 11:3912,550+6
22 Oct 2026, 10:5712,544first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.69%
avg views ÷ 12,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
462
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.374%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held72 (23 July 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total12,023
Reactions total40
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 21:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23
Links
≈2,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 66 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7769.4%
👍2522.5%
👌87.21%
🥰10.901%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC171 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik_bankrot_demo

Правила о единовременной компенсации (Закон о банкротстве в редакции Закона 282-ФЗ) применимы к новым делам о банкротстве и к тем, по которым объект застройки не передан фонду Суть требования: о взыскании с Фонда защиты прав граждан - участников долевого строительства суммы первоначальной компенсации. Решение суда: отказано, поскольку заявителем пропущен срок. Обоснование суда: правила Закона 282-ФЗ о двухэтапной …

❤2

12 Nov 2026, 09:35 UTC340 views1 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik

ВС РФ: интересы продавца балансируются (компенсируются) возможностями, которые для него открывает статья 325 ГК РФ, предусматривающая в пункте 2, что, если иное не вытекает из отношений между солидарными должниками, должник, исполнивший солидарную обязанность, имеет право регрессного требования к остальным должникам в равных долях за вычетом доли, падающей на него самого, а неуплаченное одним из солидарных должников …

❤1

12 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC341 viewsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik_bankrot_demo

Сам по себе факт наличия различных цен на один и тот же предмет на разных интернет-сайтах не означает, что оценка, произведенная соответствующей организацией, содержит серьезные недостатки, из-за которых она не отражает рыночную стоимость выставляемого на продажу имущества Суть требования: об утверждении положения о порядке, условиях и сроках реализации имущества должника. Решение суда: требование удовлетворено. О…

10 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC414 views6 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @pravo_potreb

Наследники отвечают по долгам наследодателя только в пределах стоимости унаследованного имущества Банк обратился к брату и сестре и потребовал у них вернуть больше полумиллиона рублей долгов по кредиту их покойного отца. 1️⃣ Суд выяснил, что наследство приняла только дочь умершего, это подтвердил нотариус. Поэтому суд обязал ее выплатить долги отца. 2️⃣ Краснодарский краевой суд согласился с этим решением, хотя ж…

👍6

4 Nov 2026, 14:31 UTC635 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @novice_lawyer

Садовый дом без статуса жилья может получить исполнительский иммунитет: кассация указала на ошибки судов В деле о банкротстве должник просил исключить из конкурсной массы садовый дом и участок под ним. Он проживал там летом, а в остальное время арендовал жильё, другой пригодной для проживания недвижимости у него не было. 1️⃣2️⃣ Суды отказали, сославшись на то, что по данным ЕГРН объект является нежилым, должник нах…

❤2

4 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC576 views1 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik_bankrot_demo

Требование о признании статуса залогового кредитора является самостоятельным и должно предъявляться с учетом сроков, установленных Законом о банкротстве Суть требования: об установлении залогового статуса в отношении включенной в реестр требований кредиторов должника задолженности. Решение суда: отказано. Обоснование суда: кредитором пропущен срок для обращения с заявлением в суд. По смыслу разъяснений пункта 9 по…

❤1

2 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC542 views3 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik

Действие преюдициальности судебного решения имеет определенные пределы, которые объективно определяются тем, что установленные судом в рамках его предмета рассмотрения по делу факты в их правовой сущности могут иметь иное значение в качестве элемента предмета доказывания по другому делу Суть требования: о понуждении заключить договор купли-продажи доли в уставном капитале общества. Решение суда: отказано. Обоснова…

❤3

2 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC455 views1 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik_bankrot_demo

Проверка на мнимость и проверка на компенсационное финансирование не отменяют необходимости проверить обоснованность требования по общегражданским основаниям, в частности на соответствие требования условиям договора между должником и кредитором (заявителем) Суть требования: о включении в реестр требований кредиторов должника задолженности за выполненные работы. Решение суда: отказано. Обоснование суда: заявленные …

❤1

31 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC495 views4 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik

В силу статей 721 и 761 ГК РФ качество выполненной подрядчиком работы должно соответствовать условиям договора, а при отсутствии или неполноте условий договора требованиям, обычно предъявляемым к работам соответствующего рода Суть требования: о взыскании задолженности по договору подряда, убытков на оплату государственной экспертизы некачественно выполненных работ, по договору аренды, на уплату процентов по договору…

❤2👍2

31 Oct 2026, 08:10 UTC479 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik_bankrot_demo

При установлении рыночной действительной стоимости доли суд не может ограничиваться выводами эксперта, не сопоставив их с объективными данными об имущественных активах общества, особенно в ситуации, когда такие данные ставят под сомнение корректность выводов эксперта Суть требования: о признании недействительной цепочки взаимосвязанных сделок по отчуждению доли в уставном капитале общества и применении последствий н…

❤2

30 Oct 2026, 08:10 UTC472 views1 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik_bankrot_demo

Управляющий действует в интересах гражданского правового сообщества, объединяющего кредиторов, и должника. Поэтому в подготавливаемых процессуальных документах он не вправе отражать личную позицию о законности требования того или иного кредитора, не имеющую под собой разумного обоснования Суть требования: об освобождении конкурсного управляющего от исполнения возложенных на него обязанностей. Решение суда: требован…

👍1

29 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC385 views2 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @sudpraktik

Предъявляя требование о взыскании с заказчика стоимости оказанных услуг, исполнитель должен доказать факт оказания услуг и их стоимость Суть требования: о взыскании долга по договору оказания услуг. Решение суда: требование удовлетворено. Обоснование суда: доказательства, опровергающие сведения, представленные истцом, равно как и доказательства оказания иного объема услуг, ответчик не представил. Подписанные акты …

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @karaulny_sud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 10 posts on @karaulny_sud as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 32 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Юридические советы * Законы
@yurist_tgm · 21,307
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
ЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ
@persontaxes · 31,342
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Судебная практика по банкротству
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,804
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
PRO Семейные права
@prosemuy · 20,279
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
Юридическая консультация Геннадия Ефремова
@sovetiadvokata · 46,466
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ
@yrisprudencia · 23,554
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
Налоговые споры
@nalogi_sud · 23,334
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,184
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Народный Юрист
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,513
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,737
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
ТРУДОВЫЕ СПОРЫ
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,762
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Конституционный Суд
@ksrf_ru · 28,138
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
ГАРАНТ. Новости законодательства
@garantnews · 24,504
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Юстиграм
@yustigram · 30,742
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Юридические Тонкости
@sivakovairina · 109,165
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,750
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Советы нотариуса
@n_advices · 33,475
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
Законодатель
@zaconodatel · 21,475
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Прокурорские будни
@anon_prok_press · 20,569
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
Юристы31/Online
@yurist_group31 · 35,752
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,690
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Судебный караульный” (@karaulny_sud), 12,518 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/karaulny_sud.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.