Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 43 days, net +21,467. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,511–77,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 15:17
73,997
+19,461
17 Sept 2026, 09:22
54,536
+1,072
15 Sept 2026, 08:38
53,464
+413
13 Sept 2026, 14:37
53,051
+2,085
11 Sept 2026, 21:59
50,966
-1,362
9 Sept 2026, 13:21
52,328
+1,017
6 Sept 2026, 03:59
51,311
-800
4 Sept 2026, 02:19
52,111
-689
2 Sept 2026, 15:43
52,800
+571
1 Sept 2026, 15:13
52,229
-722
31 Aug 2026, 14:02
52,951
-528
30 Aug 2026, 15:34
53,479
-792
29 Aug 2026, 15:59
54,271
-713
28 Aug 2026, 16:06
54,984
-734
27 Aug 2026, 18:06
55,718
+1,213
26 Aug 2026, 18:03
54,505
+429
25 Aug 2026, 15:46
54,076
-460
24 Aug 2026, 18:06
54,536
+589
23 Aug 2026, 03:25
53,947
-396
21 Aug 2026, 16:19
54,343
first reading
Engagement
734 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.00%
avg views ÷ 73,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,180
445 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.171%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
445
of 734 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 383 of 445 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
734 (13 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
2,303,622
Reactions total
3,194
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈51,300
Videos
≈5,540
Links
≈13,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 01m
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 230 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,016 reactions across 617 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
682
13.6%
🎉
641
12.8%
🥰
620
12.4%
⚡
589
11.7%
👏
580
11.6%
😁
571
11.4%
👍
565
11.3%
🤩
549
10.9%
❤
48
0.957%
🙉
41
0.817%
👾
35
0.698%
🦄
31
0.618%
🤡
28
0.558%
😍
10
0.199%
🤷♀
4
0.08%
🤔
3
0.06%
🤣
3
0.06%
🐳
2
0.04%
👻
2
0.04%
🤷
2
0.04%
10 further kinds
10
0.199%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 617 of the 734 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,016 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 734 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 733 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Cambodia15. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 734 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#中国 #国庆节
🇨🇳 热烈庆祝中华人民共和国成立77周年🇨🇳
金秋十月,山河锦绣,举国同庆。在这充满喜悦与祝福的美好时刻,我们共同迎来中华人民共和国成立77周年。七十七载风雨兼程,七十七载砥砺奋进,祖国在岁月长河中不断发展、进步与壮大。
从广袤山河到繁华城市,从科技创新到人民生活,一代又一代中华儿女携手奋斗,用智慧、汗水与坚持书写着属于这个时代的篇章。今天,我们共同祝愿祖国山河长青、繁荣昌盛,祝愿人民幸福安康、生活美满。
让我们怀着对祖国的热爱与祝福,共同庆祝这一庄严而美好的节日。愿未来山河更加壮丽,家园更加美好,明天更加灿烂!
🇨🇳祝伟大的祖国生日快乐,繁荣昌盛!🇨🇳
🇨🇳Celebrating the 77th Anniversary of the Founding of the People’s Republic of China🇨🇳
As autumn arrives in all its splendor, t…
Showing the 12 most recent of 734 posts we hold for @Cambodia15. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Cambodia15 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 September 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
柬埔寨西港曝光吃瓜新闻 @kaleminews · 207,918 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 28 August 2026
菲律宾大事件 @PHDA15 · 97,140 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚大事件|曝光|悬赏|投稿🏆 @dyy83 · 108,707 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻头条 @hyxw3 · 76,099 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
东南亚黑暗事件 @aq7777 · 54,495 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
泰国新闻|华人资讯曝光|thailand news @taiguohuarenzixun · 78,974 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚快讯-全网曝光 @bg888e · 54,627 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026
全球华人新闻吃瓜头条大曝光 @dnyqqbj · 120,578 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 14 August 2026
今日聚焦曝光 @a0159 · 128,685 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
东南亚大事件(吃瓜) @HH9915 · 126,803 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
柬埔寨大事件🇰🇭西港日记 @xinwenhc · 203,770 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
东南亚华人漂泊日记-柬埔寨大事件曝光 @GGooGG66 · 150,280 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚柬埔寨菲律宾华人新闻骗子曝光 @db2023dbg · 76,486 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
头条快报 @ttkb0 · 121,519 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚🇨🇿今日头条 @huohu158 · 205,209 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
🇨🇳华人社东南亚大事件 @hrs166 · 43,319 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
Аутсайдер UA @outsiderukraine · 42,113 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“柬埔寨大事件” (@Cambodia15), 73,997 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cambodia15.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.