Channel
@baoguang211
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,702subscribers
-371 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001620359632 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguang211 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguang211 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 4,702 | -224 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 4,926 | -143 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 5,069 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 5,073 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 5,073 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#群友投稿：清晨的西港很安静，安静得像什么都没发生过。只有我盯着手机屏幕，像个不肯醒的人。 阿根廷对阵佛得角。第29分钟，梅西进球的那一刻，我真的以为今晚会不一样。1:0。我甚至提前开始相信结局。 可第59分钟，佛得角追平。我整个人一下子安静下来，像被人从梦里拽回现实。可我还在安慰自己——没事，还有时间，还有加时，还有阿根廷，还有梅西。 加时赛，阿根廷再进一个，我的心又被点燃——下一秒，又被他们亲手掐灭。2:2。 没有崩溃。只是整个人一点点空下去。 后面的比赛，我已经不想看了。低头看着下注记录，忽然觉得可笑。我在异乡拼命活着，还要把希望押在一场球上。 可更可笑的是——我明明知道结局可能是这样，却还是选择相信梅西，相信阿根廷国家足球队。 窗外的世界照常运转。只有我，像输掉了一点钱，也输掉了一点不该有的希望。 可最可悲的是，我心里很清楚——下一场哨声响起的时候，我还是会坐在这里，像今晚一样，继续把自己，慢慢押进去。 …
❤1
#网友吐槽 #西港 #海悦国际酒店 吐槽一下海悦国际酒店。 外面买的东西一律不让带进去，每次最多只能带一瓶水，多带一瓶都不行。就算走海悦国际赌场的大门，一样会被拦下来。 更离谱的是，超市明明就在 8 楼，电梯卡却刷不了 8 楼。超市开在那里，却不让你自己坐电梯上去，也是第一次见。 跟着别人刷卡到了 8 楼，想着买点零食，结果身上没带现金，扫码付 ABA 还要额外收手续费。 从进门、坐电梯，到买东西、付款，几乎每一个环节都能让人无语一次。不是某一个规定离谱，而是每一步操作都在不断刷新我的认知。 照片就不发了，反正说再多也斗不过海悦。 以上句句属实！！！ _ ☑️关注：新闻曝光频道🔔投稿 @bg9110
#柬埔寨新闻 #现场抓捕视频 柬埔寨卜迭棉芷省捣毁5处网络诈骗窝点，207名外籍人员被捕 卜迭棉芷省消息：2026年7月3日下午，柬埔寨卜迭棉芷省统一指挥委员会开展大规模联合执法行动，对位于诗梳风市的5处涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的场所进行突击搜查。 行动中，执法人员共拘捕了207名不同国籍的外籍人员，涉嫌参与网络诈骗活动。 目前，案件仍在进一步调查处理中，柬埔寨有关部门将依法对涉案人员及相关违法犯罪行为展开后续调查。 _ ☑️关注：新闻曝光频道🔔投稿 @bg9110
#泰国新闻 泰国芭堤雅按摩店内抓获韩国网络诈骗及网赌头目，年流水高达1.24亿泰铢 2026年7月4日，泰国移民局第三分局（Immigration Division 3）宣布，在春武里府芭堤雅成功抓获一名涉嫌经营网络诈骗及网络赌博的韩国籍头目。 据介绍，国际执法机构此前向泰国警方提供情报称，一名45岁的韩国男子金某（Kim，化名）藏匿于春武里府芭堤雅地区。该男子因涉嫌参与呼叫中心诈骗（Call Center）及网络赌博案件，被国际刑警组织（Interpol）发布通缉。 调查显示，金某涉嫌运营多个面向韩国受害者的网络赌博平台，包括Shinsegae、LIGHT、Gangnam、Bang Atkan、BLUE等网站，提供百家乐、老虎机等在线赌博服务。 警方进一步侦查发现，金某经常前往邦拉蒙县农普鲁（Nong Prue）一家泰式按摩店消费。随后，移民局侦查人员在按摩店内蹲守，发现与嫌疑人体貌特征相符的男子出现后，当场出示逮捕令…
#柬埔寨新闻 柬埔寨商业博彩委员会：网络诈骗活动绝不会出现在赌场，涉案赌场将依法严惩 柬埔寨商业博彩管理委员会（GCGMC）表示，网络诈骗（Online Scam）活动绝不会在赌场内发生。 该委员会在7月3日发布的新闻声明中强调，一旦发现任何赌场涉及网络诈骗等违法犯罪活动，将依法采取法律措施，绝不姑息、绝不例外。 对于这一表态，社会观察人士认为，此类执法措施能否真正取得成效，关键仍取决于相关执法人员的履职情况以及是否能够做到公正、廉洁、诚实执法。 _ ☑️关注：新闻曝光频道🔔投稿 @bg9110
🔥1
#2026世界杯 一场世界杯，涨粉1800万+ 本届美加墨世界杯上，佛得角队门将沃津尼亚用其卓越的表现惊艳整个世界，几场比赛踢下来，其社交媒体涨粉超过1800万！ 据媒体报道，在本届世界杯开打之前，沃津尼亚的社交媒体粉丝数仅为5万，如今结束世界杯征程的他粉丝数超过1850万，且还在不断增长。 人的脚如何踢的过佛的脚？ _ ☑️关注：新闻曝光频道🔔投稿 @bg9110
#网友曝光 #林永斌 #盗取公司资源 林永斌 ，1998年牲口，护照信息 EG9216755，目前在泰国从事网络诈骗和网络赌博行业，因盗取公司资源被开除，公司已放他一码，结果还来搞公司资源。 泰国住地址： Thaithani Condominium 电话0809149724 ，所有信息已提交给中国警方和泰国警方。其他各大公司也看清楚这种垃圾 _ ☑️关注：新闻曝光频道🔔投稿 @bg9110
#柬埔寨新闻 回头看！蒙多基里省长亲率多部门联合执法，实地复查已被封禁的电诈窝点 今天上午，柬埔寨蒙多基里省省长兼省统一指挥部主席功金尼亲自率领省联合执法小组，前往该省乌良县，对前期已被依法查封的一处网络诈骗（电诈）窝点进行实地复查与督导工作。 此次联合行动集结了省警察局、省宪兵队、省军事行动区指挥部以及乌良县地方当局与警力。功金尼此行旨在强化安全管控，严防已被取缔的电诈窝点死灰复燃，确保地方治安与公共秩序的长期稳定。 新省长，在当地底子干净些～～ _ ☑️关注：新闻曝光频道🔔投稿 @bg9110
#国内新闻 从缅甸遣返后仍不收手，00后又偷渡柬埔寨进电诈园区获刑 近日，国内多家媒体披露一起跨境电诈案件。00后男子黄某此前曾在缅甸妙瓦底参与电诈，2025年3月被遣返回国后，因身患肺结核被依法取保候审。 按理说，被遣返回国后应该配合调查、安心养病，但黄某并没有真正收手。回国期间，他因手头拮据，又看到网上所谓“高薪聊天、月入过万”的招聘广告，很快再次动了出境赚钱的念头。 随后，黄某主动联系发帖人“阿财”。对方熟悉偷渡路线和园区操作，安排黄某再次非法出境，并将他带往柬埔寨电诈窝点，重新进入诈骗链条。 到了柬埔寨后，黄某的处境并没有像招聘广告说得那么轻松。他被多次转卖到不同诈骗公司，在园区和公司之间辗转，被迫按照上级安排从事网络诈骗。 据报道，诈骗公司要求黄某利用AI换脸技术，包装成“高富帅”人设，再通过租房平台接触房东，骗取对方信任后，引导对方进入虚假投资盘口。 这种套路并不是简单聊天，而是先用虚假身份建立关系，再一…
#马来西亚新闻 移民局突袭拉金两家工厂，拘留了81人 新山：警方突击搜查了拉金工业区的两家工厂，共拘留了 80 名外籍人士和一名本地人力资源官员，他们被指控雇用无证外籍劳工。 柔佛州移民局局长拿督莫哈末鲁斯迪·莫哈末达鲁斯表示，此次行动于星期五（7月3日）上午9点左右展开，目标是位于拉金工业区的一家钟表零件厂和一家零食制造厂。 他说，这次突袭行动是由该部门的执法人员在边境管制和保护局的协助下进行的。 “此次行动是经过数周的监视和情报收集后开展的，此前有消息称，雇主正在雇用无证外国工人以降低劳动力成本，”他在周六（7 月 4 日）的一份声明中说。 莫哈末鲁斯迪表示，初步调查发现，这80名外国公民涉嫌犯有各种移民罪行，包括无有效许可证工作和未能出示有效旅行证件。 被拘留者包括 31 名缅甸妇女、16 名孟加拉国男子、13 名印度尼西亚妇女、9 名印度尼西亚男子、6 名缅甸男子和 5 名巴基斯坦男子，年龄在 19 岁至 4…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @baoguang211. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【菲律宾新闻】最新爆光” (@baoguang211), 4,702 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguang211.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.