National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 106 of the 106 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 909 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -10,775. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,134–73,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 11:09
60,750
-252
10 Nov 2026, 09:09
61,002
-237
8 Nov 2026, 23:48
61,239
-189
7 Nov 2026, 14:55
61,428
-105
6 Nov 2026, 11:46
61,533
-169
5 Nov 2026, 10:26
61,702
-190
4 Nov 2026, 08:19
61,892
-62
3 Nov 2026, 08:47
61,954
-123
2 Nov 2026, 11:55
62,077
-40
1 Nov 2026, 10:28
62,117
-177
31 Oct 2026, 08:54
62,294
-180
30 Oct 2026, 05:58
62,474
-79
29 Oct 2026, 09:16
62,553
-154
28 Oct 2026, 10:39
62,707
-141
27 Oct 2026, 07:06
62,848
-80
26 Oct 2026, 09:18
62,928
-120
25 Oct 2026, 11:54
63,048
-51
24 Oct 2026, 13:54
63,099
-230
23 Oct 2026, 11:59
63,329
-161
22 Oct 2026, 11:34
63,490
first reading
Engagement
1,175 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.105%
avg views ÷ 60,750 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.6
472 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
472
of 1,175 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 449 of 472 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
1,175 (10 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total
30,018
Reactions total
1,542
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 21:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈44,300
Videos
≈4,780
Links
≈8,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 48m
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 224 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,323 reactions across 808 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,259
97.2%
❤
63
2.71%
🥰
1
0.043%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 812 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,323 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 472 posts held from the last 30 days (0.424%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
马来西亚吉隆坡 Mad Club 被突击检查,当场带走 26 名女生回去问话。
一部分人当天就放出来了,剩下的要等到周一才能办释放。跟 Mad Club 同一个老板的 Kung Fu 夜店,现在圈内也都盯着。
蒲种那边的 Club26 是移民局来查,跟警察扫DU不是一回事。布城 KDN 的移民局人员就在楼下守着,本来打算凌晨两点上去查所有人的签证证件。
有个男生的未婚妻在店里上班,签证还没搞定,他赶紧找移民局里面的熟人帮忙摆平。听圈内人说,要是被抓到无证滞留或者打工,会进移民黑名单。坊间还说,可以花钱找主管签字,想办法消掉黑名单。
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,175 posts we hold for @TGshibao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
苹果担保供需(100u) @pgdbgx · 82,447 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 16 August 2026
新葡京-千王频道 @xpjqw · 143,276 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 14 August 2026
清影10u供需👮🏻♂️每天稳定引流中🧧 @qy665 · 157,782 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 14 August 2026
📢利币供需20U💥限时10u一条 @xqlql · 110,493 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 15 August 2026
路易供需付费广告10U【限时7U发布】认准@Keep @Lvsvip · 99,943 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 15 August 2026
🆘供需广告50u【限时20u一条】 @app33 · 196,066 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 11 here — alongside 10 others — read 14 August 2026
仙宫供需50U一条 【限时10U发布】充10条送5条 @XG_6666 · 78,499 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 15 August 2026
回收/租售/抵押~NFT•+888•典藏礼物 @jygq · 44,341 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 24 August 2026
🔥黑客供需7U一条联系客服发布 @HKGXQ · 101,269 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 15 August 2026
免费代理公益频道 @gydl6 · 159,964 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 16 August 2026
TG高速免费代理-VPN-加速器 @XG_0001 · 203,319 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 14 August 2026
TG公益免费代理VPN @chiguaniu · 58,010 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 22 August 2026
西港日记|柬埔寨事件(东南亚)【9y.com冠名】 @XGRIJI · 52,458 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
【777】博彩娱乐福利频道 @c555 · 39,813 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 12 here — alongside 11 others — read 23 August 2026
币安担保 @PRON 供需广告 50U/条 @pron · 196,487 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 15 August 2026
🎖东南亚曝光悬赏通缉🎖【9y.com冠名】 @dny88 · 55,591 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
白金付费广告50u【限时20u一条】@aikun @aikun · 38,563 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 19 August 2026
东南亚快讯|海外曝光【9y.com冠名】 @DNYKX · 52,513 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
柬埔寨新闻大事件 @jpz9118 · 70,824 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
东南亚新闻头条(曝光) @dnyxwtt · 50,922 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
东南亚缅甸妙瓦底新闻|大事件|曝光|吃瓜|悬赏令 @qq2023bg · 54,570 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 13 August 2026
迪拜新闻头条 @hyxw6 · 76,379 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
东南亚华人大事件 @DNY181 · 43,008 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚-TG新闻(曝光)” (@TGshibao), 60,750 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TGshibao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.