#群友乐鑫集团阿乐返场:兄弟当表弟,员工当商品,如今众叛亲离,人人喊打 兄弟们,依旧是老牌英雄强势回归。曾经臭名昭著的波贝乐鑫集团老板“阿乐”,限时返场。自诩产业遍布波贝,关系手眼通天,恨不得把大事件当朋友圈发的“波贝王”,如今终于落得这般境地。 应曾经在乐鑫集团遭受非人虐待的众多推推要求,也结合个人的亲身经历,今天就来说说:所谓的“波贝王”,为何会走到众叛亲离这一步。是你一手造就了这最后的结局,你应该感到开心才对。可为什么,你脸上已经很久没出现笑容了? 阿乐,江西吉安人,原名宋斌,最显著的特征是右手小臂残缺。从2024年开始,他便在东南亚大事件被频繁曝光,直至今日。从骗招、抢劫其他园区,到买卖人口、绑架勒索,再到建立园区、组织电诈,他手里是一条完整的血腥产业链。 漠视他人生命,蔑视龙国警方。园区内体罚、电棍日日不断,以至于在众多推推心中,体罚反而成了最幸福的惩罚。今天被打、过两天消失的例子,后来大家竟也觉得稀松平常。毕…

Channel
安危头条/新闻头条
@dnyawtt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
51,701subscribers
-1,503 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001676304850 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnyawtt |
| Description | 安危头条是频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,生活故事分享,海外华人求助,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 商务: @tt329 #缅甸 #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #金三角 #迪拜 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnyawtt |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 51,701 | +256 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 51,445 | -157 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 51,602 | -929 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 52,531 | -82 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 52,613 | -182 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 52,795 | -513 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 53,308 | -268 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 53,576 | -129 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 53,705 | -105 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 53,810 | -137 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 53,947 | -151 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 54,098 | -171 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 54,269 | -76 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 54,345 | -67 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 54,412 | -61 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 54,473 | -25 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 54,498 | -75 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 54,573 | -202 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 54,775 | -171 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 54,946 | first reading |
Engagement
1,141 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.62%
- avg views ÷ 51,701 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,390
- 552 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.61%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 619
- of 1,141 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 408 of 552 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,141 (7 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,319,810 |
| Reactions total | 24,473 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈52,400
- Videos
- ≈9,800
- Links
- ≈27,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 10m
- Average length
- 1m 24s
Measured directly from 222 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
43,273 reactions across 698 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 8,785 | 20.3% | |
| 🎉 | 8,696 | 20.1% | |
| ❤ | 8,675 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 8,575 | 19.8% | |
| 😁 | 8,524 | 19.7% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 0.018% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.014% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.009% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 701 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43,273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 13 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#群友泰富公司,日本股票盘。 公司之前在财通金运2,后面搬到72号,去年年底又搬到波贝恒泰园区,后面扫荡我们就一直跟随公司搬家,前前后后一共搬了四次。现在项目做完两个多月了,公司不结算工资。 这是几个负责人:《姓邓的,姓吕的,姓张的》。这次只发飞机号,10月1号之前不结算,护照、本人照片,直接飞回国内。 大家都是出来求财、跑江湖的。一点点钱,又不多。老板们看到了,就结算一下咯。
安危头条/新闻头条 pinned a video
#付费广告 2028国际 #电子大水 ❗️巨额出款无忧❗️❗️ 东南亚最大线上博彩平台👍👍👍👍 #东南亚顶级高爆电子台!😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳😀😳😳 😀😳😳 😀😀😀😀 👌👌👌 平台支持USDT存取款,不限iP提款无上限,PG电子单注最高可拉2万一注 #PG电子单注最高爆奖可赢4000万+超级大奖! 2028娱乐发财网址: 2028a.vip 😍再创新高: 3.10日PG麻将胡了2万一拉 进关爆出1933万 💥 😍巨奖来袭: 3.9日PG麻将胡了2万一拉 爆出巨奖3400万💥 😍天选之子: 3.05日PG麻将胡了2万一拉喜提爆分1428万💥 😍电子大水: 3.01日PG麻将糊了 2万一拉进关爆分1031万💥 😍更多高光爆奖时刻请查看: 2028官方频道 重要的事说三遍:出款绝不卡款 绝不卡款 绝不卡款❗️❗️ U存U提 每日提款不限额度!随便提 欢迎各位盘总🔴主管🔴精英狗推🔴血战狗庄❗️❗️ 福利频道: @PG2098 客
#群友反馈:缅甸很多地方直接断网了??目前只能使用星链上网。
#群友想必大家对西港的“金贝3”都有所耳闻。 从当初号称上千人的集团,到经历柬埔寨扫荡、一次次搬家,再到停工整顿半年,如今又搬到了伊斯兰堡。 而我,作为曾经公司的管理人员,在这里兢兢业业这么多年,该做的做了,该扛的扛了,该熬的夜也熬了。可如今,因为一些所谓的“小事”让我离开,我无话可说。 不是因为我认同,而是这么多年过去,我终于明白了:一个让人拼尽全力付出,却最终连留下来的念头都没有的地方,到底是谁出了问题? 公司天天喊着“以人为本”,给自己贴“正规公司”的标签。可真正落到下面呢? 业务员、组长、主管,各个层级的点位说砍就砍,甚至拦腰砍一半。公司受到外部环境影响,要压缩成本,我理解。但既然要学正规公司,那就把正规公司的样子做出来。 天天讲绩效,实际上就是变着方法压员工工资;天天讲规矩,却不讲员工最基本的休息。既然是正规公司,为什么不能朝九晚五?为什么来了几个月,所谓周末休息有时候只剩两三个小时? 人是出来赚钱的,不是…
#凤凰卫视:妙瓦底诈骗园区卷土重来 新据点不断出现 9月28日,凤凰卫视援引缅甸媒体报道,缅甸妙瓦底地区网络诈骗活动再次出现扩张迹象。 位于妙瓦底附近的水沟谷,过去曾多次遭到清剿并拆除部分诈骗园区,但今年初开始,当地又有新的园区陆续建设,部分已经投入使用,并通过社交平台公开招募人员。 除了水沟谷外,妙瓦底市区部分区域和山区也出现新的诈骗据点,部分此前停止运作的园区重新恢复活动。有缅甸议员表示,当局需要加强对地方行政部门的监督,推动各省邦持续打击网络诈骗活动。
安危头条/新闻头条 pinned a photo
😀😃 😆🥹😅😂 彩票168统一开奖,公平公开公正。 😆🥹😅😂 168系列彩票 澳洲幸运10 ✔️幸运飞艇 香港六合彩 游戏齐全,AG视讯,PG电子。 ✔️支持 usdt 存取款 大额无忧 ,不限ip 5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣ cp9100.com 91彩娱乐 ( 活动 @cyl510 ) 5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣ cp15.cc 51彩娱乐 邀请码:70506 (对打玩家不要来,严查) 5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣5️⃣ cp9960.com 9960彩娱乐 邀请码 1117620 彩娱乐,十年信誉台,百万无忧!彩票请下注9码以下,如遇网址打不开可使用vpn或用谷歌浏览器尝试 😘😘客服 :@CPPP 🔊😀😀😀😀😀😀 😍😍😍😍 😃😀😃😀😃
#群友吐槽:老子就是想出来玩个牌! 简简单单玩个牌,输了我认,赢了我开心。 老子大把钱拿出来,不是没地方花,就是想出来玩、出来开心、出来找点刺激,安安静静玩一把牌。结果你们这些赌场,越来越会玩了。 本来庄家数学规则就已经是你们占优势,还不满足,东搞西搞,智能赌桌、数据分析、各种高科技全往桌上堆。 发几张扑克牌有这么大难度吗?那我以后进赌场是不是得先问一句:我今天是来赌钱的,还是来参加你们的人工智能训练计划? 说句难听的:既然最后都是想从我兜里抢钱,你们还费这么大劲干什么?直接过来抢啊!把我兜翻了,把钱拿走! 至少我还知道自己是被抢了。 现在倒好——想想这几年,激情燃烧坐在桌台前,对着一张扑克又吹又顶、又喊又叫,反而像个傻逼小丑一样。 开始怀疑:“妈的,我到底是来玩牌的,还是从头到尾被人戏耍了一遍?”赌场可以有优势,但别把玩家当傻子。 老子花钱买的是娱乐,不是花钱让你们把我当实验品。牌可以输,钱可以输。但别他妈让我输…
#网友西港“星汇3-1” 目前有警察正在开展执法行动,带防弹衣了,应该是抓人的,注意待在房间,别影响执法!
#巴基斯坦资讯:卡拉奇PECHS两处呼叫中心被查,79人被列入两份FIR 9月28日,据巴基斯坦媒体Dawn报道,巴基斯坦国家网络犯罪调查局(NCCIA)近日对卡拉奇PECHS Block 6两处呼叫中心展开突袭行动,两处场所据称由同一组织运营。行动中有70多人被捕,警方随后登记两份FIR,共点名79名涉案人员,其中一案48人、另一案31人。 据NCCIA调查,两处呼叫中心设在住宅区域,工作人员涉嫌以美国正规金融机构工作人员的身份联系美国民众,以办理新信用卡、低息金融服务等名义获取受害者信息。 调查显示,涉案人员涉嫌获取包括美国社会安全号码(SSN)、手机号码、出生日期以及银行账户、银行卡和信用卡资料在内的敏感信息,随后通过呼叫中心内部服务器上的CRM系统交给运营方,再由相关合作商户进行未经授权的扣款。 此次行动中,NCCIA查获了一套正在运行的CRM客户管理系统,以及电脑、客户数据库和其他数字设备。执法部门认为,这些数…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,141 posts we hold for @dnyawtt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@vip35r · 47,471#1
@iiiik · 49,140#2
@anwei2 · 34,725#3
@bx666 · 467,845#4
@Banma_xinwen · 91,805#5
@xinhuaribao · 939#6
@dny1577 · 5,340#7
@toutiao_4 · 1,166#8
@kaleminews · 207,918#9
@dxdb001 · 6,917#10
@vipn8888 · 67,457#11
@tg04277 · 33,845#12
@aza520 · 3,283#13
@baoguangqun110 · 37,625#14
@feilvbinghuarenriji · 16,655#15
@tghuarenba · 44,364#16
@xinwenhc · 203,770#17
@svipzz · 89,708#18
@hrs166 · 50,473#19
@cctv_dy · 36,686#20
@xinwen118 · 114,190#21
@gouzaibaoliao · 2,124#22
@huohu158 · 205,209#23
@xbbg8 · 280#24
@quanqiubaoliao · 172,311#25
@heicaibaog · 82,464 (as read 23 August 2026)#26
@baoguang821 · 51,566#27
@bodu08 · 58,821#28
@makatinews · 34,540#29
@gejige · 185,132#30
@tg89aa · 137,688#31
@ZLSjpz · 769#32
@Dzx199 · 23,311#33
@DNYBG234 · 86,663#34
@baoguangqun999 · 37,189#35
@jiuboo · 20,848#36
@TGPG999 · 4,714#37
@BG_BG8 · 38,746#38
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,661#39
@DB405 · 58,579#40
@feilvbinhuarenzixun · 72,699#41
@rjjjj · 42,292#42
@SB919 · 128,290#43
@dsj0161 · 2,023#44
@dubai1588 · 833#45
@HR8877 · 317,999#46
@ttkb0 · 120,417#47
@phnews · 14,671#48
@baoguangba088 · 236,958#49
@baoguang85 · 31,656#50
@svip40 · 110,383#51
@JPZDSJ · 220,328#52
@DNYXW008 · 79,700#53
@dnyxst · 70,799#54
@PHDA15 · 90,980#55
@jdw168 · 6,329#56
@nnccqq · 38,432#57
@fei3131 · 31,935#58
@baoguangee · 179,272#59
@Dubaihuarenzixun · 65,366#60
@qqdsj · 196,784#61
@bg833 · 322,837#62
@feilibingFBI · 7,435#63
@BG2288 · 81,773#64
@chadnag001 · 55,919#65
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@xinwenhc · 203,770
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 15 August 2026
@hyxw6 · 83,736
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
@JPZDSJ · 220,328
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 August 2026
@aq7777 · 54,495
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@bbsooo · 90,674
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 August 2026
@bgdsj26 · 120,707
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@bg888e · 54,627
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 August 2026
@XGRIJI · 63,705
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 21 August 2026
@huohu158 · 205,209
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
@gejige · 185,132
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 August 2026
@rjjjj · 42,292
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 27 August 2026
@iiiik · 49,140
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 26 August 2026
@Banma_xinwen · 91,805
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@PHDA15 · 90,980
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
@mianbeiy · 63,059
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 19 August 2026
@tghuarenba · 44,364
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 26 August 2026
@vipn8888 · 67,457
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
@a0159 · 128,346
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 13 August 2026
@Cambodia15 · 73,997
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 24 August 2026
@hrs166 · 50,473
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 August 2026
@tg04277 · 33,845
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
@malaixiyahuarenzixun · 65,495
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@QWHRBGB · 198,448
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 August 2026
@dnyxst · 70,799
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“安危头条/新闻头条” (@dnyawtt), 51,701 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnyawtt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.