Channel
@rjjjj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,542subscribers
+518 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002239365945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @baoguangad @rjjjj |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rjjjj |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 45,542 | -205 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 45,747 | -74 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 45,821 | -242 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 46,063 | -100 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 46,163 | -196 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 46,359 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 46,376 | -61 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 46,437 | +2,187 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 44,250 | -174 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 44,424 | -263 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 44,687 | -175 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 44,862 | -142 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:20 | 45,004 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 45,024 | first reading |
73 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 73 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 78,059 |
| Reactions total | 81 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
81 reactions across 44 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 49 | 60.5% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 24.7% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.70% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.47% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🆘【300多部手机24小时轮番群发，江西警方端掉3个“引流车间”】🆘 江西丰城警方近日打掉一个专门为境外违法犯罪团伙和黑灰产业提供引流服务的团伙，抓获徐某某等5人，捣毁3处非法信息发送窝点，现场查获手机300余部、手机卡120余张及一批作案工具。 警方调查发现，徐某某等人大量收购二手手机和手机卡，搭建可以同时控制数百部手机的发送平台，利用苹果iMessage批量向国内用户推送“网络赌博”“色情推广”“代开发票”等引流信息。 这些信息通常附带链接，诱导接收者点击并下载涉诈App，再将人员引向非法网站、群聊或后续诈骗环节。 为逃避封堵，这个团伙频繁更换手机卡和苹果ID，安排设备24小时轮换发送。3处窝点内，大量手机长期保持充电和开机状态，形成规模化“引流车间”，不断向外群发垃圾信息，其中还包括“高赔率博彩”“日结刷单”等内容。 警方掌握团伙人员和窝点位置后，刑侦大队联合孙渡派出所展开集中收网，同时突入3处窝点，将正在操作设…
#巴基斯坦 拉瓦尔品第被围园区后续报道。 调查出现重大转折，官员称从中国和越南公民身上搜出与中国和越南警察制服。 当局正在调查这些制服为何会出现在他们手中以及可能的使用方式。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
#网友投稿： 就在刚刚，金三角特区“金水湾”又有几个电信专家被治安局抓走了！ ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
#柬埔寨资讯：西港突袭涉嫌网络诈骗地点，25人被捕 8月14日——据当地警方消息，根据西哈努克省政府省长的指示，西哈努克市行政指挥部在西哈努克省法院检察官的协调下，对西哈努克市第四区第五村的10栋公寓楼开展突击检查行动。 据警方通报，此次行动共查获30台笔记本电脑和85部手机等电子设备。行动中，当局共逮捕25名人员，其中包括14名涉嫌参与网络诈骗的人员，其中2人为中国公民。2人为女性，以及11名涉嫌无有效护照及相关合法证件居住的人员。 目前，相关嫌疑人及查获的证据已被移送至西哈努克省警察总部，接受进一步审讯和调查。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
👍1
#抗战胜利81周年 勿忘国耻 铭记胜利，吾辈自强。1945年8月15日，日本宣布无条件投降，已是第81个年头。 一寸山河一寸血，无数先辈以血肉之躯挡住侵略，换来我们如今安稳的生活。 我们回望苦难，不是记住仇恨，而是记住历史教训。 历史不容篡改，英雄不能遗忘。愿山河永固，盛世长存。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ
🇱🇦 万象警方突袭“雅典饭店” 捣毁电诈及毒品窝点 抓获74名嫌疑人 老挝媒体8月14日报道： 老挝公安部专案组于8月12日，对万象市西科达崩县农萨诺坎村雅典饭店（Athen Hotel，包含两栋建筑）开展突击行动，捣毁一处涉嫌网络犯罪与毒品的犯罪窝点。 本次行动共抓获嫌疑人74名，其中：中国籍71人，中国台湾地区2人，越南籍女性1人。 警方现场查获大量用于网络犯罪的台式电脑、笔记本电脑、手机等电子设备，同时起获多种非法毒品、毒品加工调配设备、吸毒工具、被称作Pod K的涉毒电子烟以及压缩大麻等涉案物品。部分毒品经过包装伪装，具有较强迷惑性。 目前，老挝公安部专案组已将全部嫌疑人以及涉案证物带回开展进一步调查。警方表示，将深挖该团伙上下游网络，追查其余涉案人员，依法追究相关人员法律责任。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
❤1
#泰国新闻 四色菊府 70 岁老翁酒后持刀杀害邻居，事发次日即被警方抓捕 2026 年 8 月 14 日，四色菊府库坎警局指挥官德奇尼瓦特・索姆苏泰中校带队通报一桩恶性伤人命案，抓获 70 岁男性嫌疑人（媒体暂未公布全名，文中称胖先生），嫌疑人作案工具树桩刀一并被警方收缴带回审讯。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
👍2
#曝光 #齐鑫鹏 泰国发生恶性绑架杀人案，嫌疑人齐鑫鹏作案后潜逃 8月7‑8日，泰国发生一起恶性刑事案件。嫌疑人齐鑫鹏伙同两名缅甸籍人员、两名中国人，于KTV门口将其老板绑架，之后诱骗老板女友前往别墅，逼迫二人交出钱财密码，随后将两人杀害，尸体掩埋于泳池下方，嫌疑人作案之后出逃失联。 齐鑫鹏跟随受害人工作已有半年，受害老板名下拥有约800万美金资产，其女友持有约16万美金。案发之后，齐鑫鹏安排一名中国人与一名缅甸人前往受害人公寓搬走保险柜，本人在外接应。保险柜内有三根金条、150万泰铢以及若干美金。 齐鑫鹏，1998年10月8日出生，籍贯河北邯郸涉县，所持中国护照已经办理挂失，还持有另一本护照，目前处于失联潜逃状态。受害人家属仍在寻找两名被害人，有知情人士掌握案件线索，但暂时无法联系上被害人家属。 相关线索建议提交给泰国警方以及国内公安、中国驻泰国使领馆，交由官方开展侦查工作。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝…
👍1
#网友投稿 #欠钱不还 #张家维 认识此人的，请大家注意避坑了！ 给了你多少时间和机会，每次都是找理由忽悠，一次次的编，一次次的骗，骗完一个换一个继续到处骗，当初是看你一把年纪不容易，才一次次借你钱，你他妈从来就没打算还过，菲律宾那会借了多少，我都不想说了，我也没有再要了，来柬埔寨又一次次借了一万多u，也是一毛都不带还的，还想着要继续借，就是一个老骗子，把你当兄弟，你他妈把人当傻子呢，满嘴谎话跑火车，当初真是瞎了眼，怎么信了你的一次次鬼话，你真的是走到哪里骗到哪里，干到哪里那就就要倒闭，遇到你这样的人真的是衰，认识你的人也都是倒了霉！ ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
❤1👍1
#老挝资讯：向泰国移交139名涉嫌网络赌博人员 后续将依法调查处理 8月13日，在万象—廊开第一老泰友谊大桥国际边境口岸，老挝公安部特别行动组将139名涉嫌从事网络赌博活动的泰国公民移交泰国有关部门。 此次移交人员包括81名女性和58名男性。按照后续安排，相关人员将由泰方依法展开调查，并根据调查结果采取进一步法律措施。 双方相关部门代表共同出席了此次人员交接仪式。此次行动体现了老泰两国在跨境犯罪打击、维护边境安全及加强执法合作方面的持续协调。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
2.4万美元，他把同胞卖到了园区 8月13日，金边市初级法院审理了一起绑架案。一名34岁的中国籍赌场员工因涉嫌将一名中国女子以2.4万美元的价格卖到了一家赌场而被捕。 据悉，男子名叫李明光（Li Guang Ming，音译）。据指控，2025年9月8日，他在金边市桑园区绑架一名中国女子，并将其贩卖给电诈团伙，获利2.4万美元。2025年9月18日，李明光被捕，并被关押至白梳监狱，并 依据《打击人口贩卖和性剥削法》第14条被提起公诉。目前，李明光被控人口贩卖罪，若罪名成立，将面临2至5年监禁。 ——————————————— ⚡全网曝光：@RJJJJ 😀免费投稿：@nana
#国际资讯：万里赴缅：数千非洲人如何进入妙瓦底诈骗园区？ 近年来，位于泰缅边境地区的诈骗产业持续受到国际关注。其中，一个长期存在的疑问逐渐浮出水面：大量来自非洲多个国家的人员，是如何跨越近万公里，最终进入缅甸妙瓦底一带的诈骗园区？ 据当地相关信息显示，妙瓦底以及泰国来兴府湄索县、朴帕县沿莫艾河一带的部分诈骗窝点内，曾出现大量非洲国家人员身影。这些人员来源涉及多个国家，其中部分人声称是受到高薪工作招聘吸引，自愿前往；也有人表示遭遇虚假招聘、欺骗甚至人口贩卖，最终被困诈骗园区。 据了解，部分人员的跨境路线十分复杂。他们可能从非洲多个国家出发，经航空交通抵达东南亚，再进入泰国境内，随后前往泰缅边境地区，最终通过非正规渠道进入缅甸妙瓦底相关区域。 这一过程中，多个环节引发外界关注。 首先，在入境环节，大量人员需要办理泰国签证并留下相关资料。如果背后存在中介或组织协助办理，那么签证申请材料、代理机构以及相关人员是否能够被追踪，成…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @rjjjj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 163,114 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全网曝光” (@rjjjj), 45,542 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rjjjj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.