wth LWoof 🐶
💩1🤡1

Channel
@raum_rocks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
20,533subscribers
-146 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002218804210 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @raum_rocks |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/raum_rocks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 20,533 | -20 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 20,553 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 20,565 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 20,581 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 20,602 | -22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 20,624 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 20,644 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:10 | 20,656 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 20,673 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 20,679 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 20,679 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 December 2025 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 460 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
214 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 71 | 33.2% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 31.3% | |
| 🎄 | 31 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 8.88% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.80% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.34% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.935% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.467% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.467% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @raum_rocks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 December 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
wth LWoof 🐶
💩1🤡1
Gm frens! 🐾🚀 Our friends @aura_yields are building institutional ALM for Uniswap V3/V4 — protecting LPs from MEV and LVR. Live on Avalanche, BNB and X Layer. We've worked with these guys before - they ship 🔥 Go follow them 👇 x.com/aura_yields 🐾
🔥2💩1🤡1
💜 An Open Conversation: RAUM is frozen. We are executing a pivot. We have always communicated directly. The current phase of RAUM in TON ecosystem is officially on pause. The network's infrastructure momentum has stalled, and key partnerships have been interrupted due to internal processes at the TON Foundation. Building a product in a vacuum is simply burning time and capital. We are closing this chapter and reallo…
👍3❤1🍾1💩1🤡1🥰1
⚡️ Infrastructure Update: Core Migration to Swap Coffee As we announced earlier, our team has completed the update! Starting today, all trade routing in the Swap section is powered by the Swap Coffee engine. What has changed: 🟣 New Core: More efficient routing thanks to Swap Coffee mechanics. 🟣 UI Optimization: A redesigned token selection interface—less visual noise, faster execution, and the ability to pin your …
🥰4❤2
⚡️ We are attending Moscow Trading Week. Zero white noise. Just concentrated institutional expertise. The Federation Tower is bringing together those who manage real capital: regulators, hedge fund managers, brokers, and exchange representatives. Pure information asymmetry—all critical data and contacts in one location. Program architecture: ▸ Strategies: equity, derivatives, commodities, and FX markets ▸ Execution…
❤2🥰1
⚡️Moscow Trading Week 2026 While our team is busy finding new partners at Blockchain Life, we won’t leave you without high-quality activities. If you are also looking for project partners or want to expand your professional network, this is an event to watch. Moscow Trading Week 2026 — a dedicated space in the heart of Moscow City where practicing traders, fund managers, and issuers meet. This is where real capital…
❤3👍1
⚡️ RAUM: Working the Sidelines and the Code While half of the RAUM team is busy forging B2B connections at Blockchain Life 2026, our dev department is finalizing key updates. Our focus for this quarter: 1️⃣ On-chain Withdrawals: Fully automated asset withdrawals directly to the network. 2️⃣ Case Mechanics: "Case-style" gamification — a new level of platform interaction. 3️⃣ Partnerships & Contests: Currently finali…
❤3
⚡️ Alexander Vinnik will speak at the Blockchain Forum in Moscow on April 14! If you're deep in the market, you definitely know this name. Vinnik is the co-founder of BTC-e, one of the very first crypto exchanges. The project launched back in 2011, when the industry was just in its infancy—no rules, no regulation, and maximum uncertainty. This is Alexander’s first public appearance, and he’s set to reveal all the…
❤🔥1😁1
⚡️ Investing isn’t about chasing headlines; it’s about the continuity of strategy. On April 15, at Blockchain Life 2026, Errol Musk will take the stage. While the mainstream media focuses on the famous surname, we look at the data: a man who has spent decades investing in engineering and digital assets. In a world where AI and Crypto are colliding to form new business models, his perspective is a rare chance to see …
👍1
⚡️ Everyone claims they "understand the market." Meanwhile, the market does +300% without you. The fastest way to understand what is actually happening in crypto isn't scrolling your feed, but being exactly where: — positions are secured before official announcements — narratives are shaped, not just read about — the true vector of capital flow is known Spoiler: this doesn’t happen on social media. It happens at Bl…
🔥1🤓1
Have you tested your luck already?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤🔥1😭1
⚡️ Who swept all the profit from the Roulette? It’s been long enough since the update for everyone to risk their guaranteed game for a shot at grabbing x3 or x5 token-catching attempts. We can see who hit the jackpots on our backend, but we want to hear it straight from you. Vote for your highest multiplier below! 👇
❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @raum_rocks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Have you tested your luck already?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 48,300 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAUM: Play easy, earn fun! ☂️” (@raum_rocks), 20,533 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/raum_rocks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.