Coub turns 14! 🥳 Check out featured birthday coubs on the #coubirthday channel!
😁212❤195🍌78🎉35🤔26❤🔥19🌚18🌭11

Channel
@coubnews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
1,256,717subscribers
-11,276 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001713582473 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coubnews |
| Description | 🎬 Coub: Watch, Create, Earn! Dive into Coub’s world of short videos on Telegram. Explore fun clips, create your own, and earn $COUB rewards! Share with friends, complete challenges, and get ready for TG Shorts -a new 60-sec video experience coming soon |
| Created | 8 April 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coubnews |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 1,256,717 | -1,825 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 1,258,542 | -2,019 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 1,260,561 | -1,849 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 1,262,410 | -1,257 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 1,263,667 | -1,834 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 1,265,501 | -1,674 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 1,267,175 | -818 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 1,267,993 | first reading |
107 posts held, back to 8 April 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 43 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 107 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128,022 reactions across 18 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 65,233 | 51.0% | |
| ❤ | 17,791 | 13.9% | |
| 🤔 | 7,199 | 5.62% | |
| 🎉 | 5,961 | 4.66% | |
| 🍌 | 4,990 | 3.90% | |
| 😐 | 4,411 | 3.45% | |
| 😁 | 4,203 | 3.28% | |
| 💔 | 3,483 | 2.72% | |
| 💯 | 2,485 | 1.94% | |
| 🔥 | 2,106 | 1.65% | |
| ⚡ | 1,910 | 1.49% | |
| 🌭 | 1,528 | 1.19% | |
| 🥰 | 1,138 | 0.889% | |
| 🍾 | 1,039 | 0.812% | |
| 🌚 | 794 | 0.62% | |
| 😱 | 746 | 0.583% | |
| ❤🔥 | 573 | 0.448% | |
| 🐳 | 538 | 0.42% | |
| 😢 | 321 | 0.251% | |
| 🏆 | 314 | 0.245% | |
| 7 further kinds | 1,259 | 0.983% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 548,116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2022 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coubnews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 April 2022 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Coub turns 14! 🥳 Check out featured birthday coubs on the #coubirthday channel!
😁212❤195🍌78🎉35🤔26❤🔥19🌚18🌭11
The most memorable and creative coubs of the year are already in our editorial pick, «Best of 2025»! Throughout January, we’ll be publishing daily couber’s picks with their own versions of the best of the year. Keep an eye on Stories — and don’t forget, you can still create your own and get featured. Stay Coubed! 🤘
🍌212❤119🎉58😢49👍47😐20🤔15🔥14
It's time to sum up the year! Create a story from the best coubs made in 2025: use your own works, coubs from other coubers, or make several thematic stories. Toggle the switch «Suggest to feature in Stories». The best compilations will be published daily in January. 🤘
🍌141❤62😐59😁29🎉18🤔12🔥8😈8
This year we focused on optimizing the platform, so there weren’t many visible changes. But the changes we did make matter most. Here’s what’s new.
🎉191😁132🍌89❤83😐34🔥25🤔24🌚17
Coub turns 13! 🥳 Check out featured birthday coubs on the #coubirthday channel!
😁1,950👍1,290❤736😐471🍌255🎉177🌚119👏96
Coub.com News pinned a photo
Happy New Year, coubers! Welcome to 2025 🎆 2024 was a ride — full of wild coubs, epic tokens, and the strongest community vibes. But 2025? We’re taking it to legendary levels 🤘🤘🤘 This year, it’s all about creating, pumping and trading like never before. Whether you’re crafting viral coubs or dropping tokens, the future is yours to shape 🤩 🤘 To kick things off, we’ve put together the “Best of 2024” — daily picks fr…
🎉3,920👍3,270😐1,050❤966❤🔥354🍌326🤔277🍾184
2024 was an awesome year, and we’ve put together the «Best of 2024» to show off all the creativity on Coub. In January, daily picks from creators are coming your way — there’s still time to make your own versions! Holiday-themed coubs will be dropping on the #NewYearCoub channel. A special task awaits you in our MiniApp! Stay Coubed! 🤘
👍1,380😐405😁166🍌99💔94❤🔥83🎉83🌭52
🤘 Big news, fam! 🤘 Get ready, because COUB just unlocked a brand-new power for you 🤩 Starting today, you can boost your coubs AND your tokens directly in the mini-app! 🚀 Here’s how it works: Take those hard-earned $COUBs from completed tasks and put them to work. More visibility = more hype = more success for your coubs and tokens! 🔥 Whether you’re making sure your coub gets seen by more people, pumping your toke…
👍8,730❤2,770😐1,220🍌380🤔373💔365🎉338🍾247
Coub.com News pinned «Dear Coubers, We have noticed that fake COUB 🤘tokens are being distributed in the TON network. These tokens are not affiliated with us in any way. Please be cautious and verify any information before engaging with tokens. We strongly advise you to only trust…»
Dear Coubers, We have noticed that fake COUB 🤘tokens are being distributed in the TON network. These tokens are not affiliated with us in any way. Please be cautious and verify any information before engaging with tokens. We strongly advise you to only trust official announcements. Thank you for your attention and stay safe 🤘
👍10,500💔2,130❤1,770💯518🔥518🤔515😱428🌭364
🗿 Pump Launchpad by Coub. Launching New Tokens on STON.fi Stonfiers, if you love short viral videos as much as fresh, promising tokens, this announcement is for you. Introducing Pump, the new launchpad from the Coub platform. ℹ️ Coub is a video platform available both on the website and as a mini-app on Telegram. Coub allows users to watch short videos, upload and monetize their content. Pump is a launchpad for tok…
👍2,940❤941🍌233🔥121😁111😐111❤🔥110🕊70
Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @coubnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 431,104 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Coub.com News” (@coubnews), 1,256,717 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coubnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.