Channel
@obzs999g
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,574subscribers
+4,297 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001763325637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @obzs999g |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/obzs999g |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 6,574 | -176 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 6,750 | -248 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 6,998 | +4,721 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 2,277 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 2,277 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (27 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,360 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
【8月12日 17点整 LPL EDG vs AL】 数据初盘开出全局获胜：[email protected]/[email protected]，机构更倾向于AL的绝对优势。AL暂以6胜2负、+8净胜分高居登峰组第3位，整体表现极具统治力，前中期在Tarzan的带节奏下野区与线上联动紧密，前中期节奏推进高效且压迫感十足。EDG则状态低迷，目前以0胜8负、-15净胜分惨遭登峰组垫底，队伍在前中期经常节奏掉档，中后期团战决策与战术执行力频繁脱节。两队近期交手AL多以压倒性优势获胜，阵容弹性与英雄池深度上AL优势极其显著。面对一胜难求的EDG，综合分析本场看好AL凭借强劲的前中实力与极佳的竞技状态轻松拿下胜利。 首局一血：[email protected] 首局击杀让分：[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小：小[email protected]
【8月12日 1点整 欧冠资 考诺萨基列斯 vs 萨格勒布迪纳摩】 数据方面机构开出客队让1/1.5，给予实力的认可。考诺萨基列斯近期状态较为稳定，近10场取得6胜3平1负，球队整体表现出色，防守端尤为稳固，近阶段场均失球仅0.8球，主场具备较强的抗衡能力。萨格勒布迪纳摩近10场同样保持不败，取得6胜4平，整体实力和比赛经验更占优势，球队进攻端火力强劲，场均进球达到3球，进攻效率十分突出。作为欧战常客，萨格勒布迪纳摩在阵容深度和比赛节奏控制方面更具优势。综合双方近期数据来看，客队攻防表现更加全面，本场更看好萨格勒布迪纳摩客场取胜。 全场让球：萨格勒布迪纳摩-1/[email protected] 全场大小：大[email protected] 推荐比分：1-3
【8月11日 3点15分 葡超 圣克拉拉 vs 马德拉国民】 数据初盘开出全场让球：圣克拉拉-0.5，机构倾向主队优势。葡萄牙超级联赛第1轮，主队近五场友谊赛4胜1平保持不败战绩，球队攻防有序，韧性十足，整体表现相对稳定。客队近六场友谊赛3平3负未尝胜绩，球队防守薄弱，表现欠佳，状态回落。两队近四场交锋圣克拉拉2胜1平1负占优，近年实力更胜一筹，另加主场之利，综合分析本场看好主队拿下新赛季开门红。 全场让球：圣克拉拉[email protected] 全场大小：小2/[email protected] 推荐比分：1-0
【8月11日 1点整 丹麦超 锡尔克堡 vs 欧登塞】 数据方面机构开出双方平手盘，给予两队状态的支持。锡尔克堡与欧登塞上一次交锋中，锡尔克堡客场3-2击败对手，在心理层面占据一定优势。球队在进攻端展现出较强的冲击力，面对欧登塞的防线能够创造出较多机会。本场回到主场作战，锡尔克堡在熟悉的比赛环境下有望延续良好表现，整体掌控力也会进一步增强。欧登塞虽然具备一定竞争能力，但客场面对锡尔克堡时防守压力较大，想要扭转此前交锋劣势并不容易。综合双方实力和主场优势来看，本场更看好锡尔克堡主场取胜。 全场让球：锡尔克堡[email protected] 全场大小：小3/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-1
【8月10日 1点整 葡超 波尔图 vs 艾华卡】 数据方面机构开出主队让2，给予实力的绝对认可。波尔图与艾华卡近4次交锋中，波尔图取得全胜，心理优势十分明显。作为葡超传统豪门，波尔图在整体实力、阵容深度以及比赛经验方面均占据明显优势，尤其主场作战时具备较强的控制力和进攻压制能力。艾华卡面对强队时往往防守压力较大，想要在客场限制波尔图的进攻难度较高。结合双方历史交锋情况以及主场优势，波尔图有望延续对赛优势，掌握比赛节奏。综合分析，本场更看好波尔图主场取胜。 全场让球：波尔图[email protected] 全场大小：大2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：3-0
【8月9日 15点整 LPL IG vs 苏州LNG】 数据初盘开出全局获胜：[email protected]/苏州[email protected]，机构更倾向于IG优势。LPL中国职业联赛第三赛段涅槃组，IG暂以2胜1负排名涅槃组第2位，队伍状态良好，上单TheShy在涅槃组展现极强个人能力，两场BO3贡献四次单杀，被冠以涅槃单杀王称号。LNG暂以0胜2负排名涅槃组第4位，净胜场-4，开季至今尚未取得大场胜利，整体表现持续低迷。两队近期在8月2日有过一次直接交锋，IG以2-0横扫LNG，两局比赛TheShy连拿两局MVP，上路sheer被完全压制，打野Wei在野区对位中也明显优于Weiwei。面对LNG时TheShy无论是线上单杀还是团战收割都展现碾压级表现。综合分析本场看好IG延续对LNG的压制节奏再下一城。 首局一血：[email protected] 地图总数大小：小[email protected] 正确地图比分：[email protected]
【8月9日 2点整 荷甲 PSV埃因霍温 vs 福图纳锡塔德】 数据初盘开出全场让球：PSV埃因霍温-2/2.5，机构倾向主队较大优势。荷兰甲级联赛第1轮，主队传控能力强，阵容完整，韧性十足，实力强劲。客队作客四连败，客场劣势明显，防守能力较为薄弱，整体表现未如理想。两队近十场交锋PSV埃因霍温8胜2平保持不败战绩，近四场更获全胜，整体实力碾压对手，另加主场优势，综合分析本场看好主队拿下新赛季开门红。 全场让球：PSV埃因霍温-2/[email protected] 全场大小：大[email protected] 推荐比分：4-1
【8月9日 0点45分 荷甲 前进之鹰 vs 威廉二世】 数据方面机构开出主队让0.5/1，给予实力的认可。前进之鹰近期主场表现较为稳定，近10个主场取得6胜1平3负，球队在主场具备较强的竞争力，进攻端和比赛控制能力都有不错发挥。威廉二世客场状态十分出色，近10个客场取得9胜1平，保持极高的不败率，球队客场适应能力和防守稳定性值得关注。双方近期走势存在明显差异，前进之鹰主场优势不容忽视，而威廉二世强势客场表现也让比赛充满悬念。预计双方都会采取较为谨慎的策略，比赛节奏可能偏向均衡。综合分析，本场更看好双方常规时间握手言和。 全场让球：威廉二世+0.5/[email protected] 全场大小：小[email protected] 推荐比分：1-1
【8月8日 3点15分 葡超 埃斯托里尔 vs 法马利康】 数据初盘开出全场让球：埃斯托里尔+0/0.5，机构倾向客队稍占优势。葡萄牙超级联赛第1轮，主队近四场友谊赛1胜2平1负，状态平平，整体表现未如理想。客队近八场友谊赛3胜4平1负仅一场败仗，防守能力有所提升，表现稳定，状态回暖。两队近十场交锋法马利康6胜1平3负占优，近四场对绩更获全胜，整体实力相对较强，综合分析本场看好客队拿下新赛季开门红。 全场让球：法马利康-0/[email protected] 全场大小：大[email protected] 推荐比分：1-2
【8月8日 2点整 荷甲 坎布尔 vs SBV精英】 数据方面机构开出双方平手盘，给予两队状态的支持。坎布尔近期状态较为一般，近10场取得3胜2平5负，整体表现起伏较大，球队在攻防两端的稳定性仍有不足。从双方近期数据来看，SBV精英优势较为明显，近10场取得8胜2平保持不败，无论胜率还是进攻效率都明显领先。SBV精英场均进球达到3.2球，进攻端火力充足，而坎布尔防守端场均失球偏高，面对强势进攻球队时压力较大。虽然坎布尔拥有主场优势，但SBV精英近期状态和整体发挥更值得信赖。综合分析，本场更看好SBV精英客场取胜。 全场让球：SBV精英[email protected] 全场大小：大[email protected] 推荐比分：1-3 全场让球：本菲卡[email protected] 全场大小：小3.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：3-0
【8月7日 3点整 欧联资 本菲卡 vs 哈茨】 数据方面机构开出主队让2.5，给予实力的绝对认可。本菲卡近期状态较为稳定，近10场取得6胜2平2负，球队整体实力和比赛控制能力依然处于较高水平。作为葡超传统强队，本菲卡在欧战资格赛中拥有丰富经验，主场作战时往往能够展现更强的进攻压制力。哈茨近10场取得4胜1平5负，整体表现有所起伏，客场面对实力更强的对手时防守压力较大。相比之下，本菲卡在阵容深度、比赛节奏以及主场优势方面更占上风，有望掌握比赛主动。综合分析，本场更看好本菲卡主场取胜。 全场让球：本菲卡[email protected] 全场大小：小3.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：3-0
【8月7日 1点整 欧联资 萨尔茨堡红牛 vs 帕福斯】 数据初盘开出全场让球：萨尔茨堡红牛-1，机构倾向主队优势。欧洲联赛资格赛，主队斩获两连胜，其对传控能力强，攻防兼备，实力毋庸置疑。客队作客已遭受三连败，客场劣势明显，球队防守较为薄弱，状态欠稳，整体表现未如理想。两队整体实力相比之下萨尔茨堡红牛更胜一筹，另加主场优势，综合分析本场看好主队轻松取胜。 全场让球：萨尔茨堡红牛[email protected] 全场大小：小2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-0
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @obzs999g. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 590,354 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“世界杯 五大联赛 足球 篮球 体育竞彩推单” (@obzs999g), 6,574 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/obzs999g.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.