Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

体育推单|足球推单|电竞推单

@tiyu09

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,889subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001044396618
TypeChannel
Username@tiyu09
CreatedBetween 1 February 2016 and 31 August 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tiyu09

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tiyu09/8377 · this entry3 Sept 2025, 14:59 UTC@gfzs7/99253 Sept 2025, 14:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@tiyu09/8378 · this entry4 Sept 2025, 06:15 UTC@gfzs7/99264 Sept 2025, 06:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@gfzs7/99274 Sept 2025, 07:55 UTC@tiyu09/8379 · this entry4 Sept 2025, 07:55 UTC1.00under a minute
@gfzs7/99284 Sept 2025, 14:16 UTC@tiyu09/8380 · this entry4 Sept 2025, 14:16 UTC1.00under a minute
@gfzs7/99295 Sept 2025, 06:11 UTC@tiyu09/8381 · this entry5 Sept 2025, 06:11 UTC1.00under a minute
@tiyu09/8382 · this entry5 Sept 2025, 12:34 UTC@gfzs7/99305 Sept 2025, 12:34 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@gfzs710 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 11 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 September 2025 to 9 October 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @tiyu09 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,8899,9029,895.57 August 2026 — 9,902 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,902 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,889 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,887–9,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:069,889-13
7 Aug 2026, 14:169,902no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:049,902first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2025 to 9 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2025, 07:48 UTC≈8,120 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

10月9日 足球赛事推荐 亚洲杯 16:00 文莱 vs 也门 文莱 +2 亚洲杯 17:00 巴基斯坦 vs 阿富汗 阿富汗 -0.5 亚洲杯 18:00 斯里兰卡 vs 土库曼斯坦 斯里兰卡 +0.51 亚洲杯 19:30 新加坡 vs 印度 全场小 22.5 亚洲杯 20:00 老挝 vs 马来西亚 老挝 +2.5 亚洲杯 20:30 泰国 vs 中国台湾 全场大 3.54 亚洲杯 20:30 越南 vs 尼泊尔 越南 -2.5 挪威U19 20:30 布兰U19 vs 利勒斯特罗姆U19 全场大 4.5 国际友谊 21:00 乌兹别克 vs 科威特 乌兹别克 -1.5 亚洲杯 22:00 孟加拉国 vs 中国香港 中国香港 -0.5 10月9日 篮球赛事推荐 澳国篮 16:30 阿德莱德36人 vs 塔斯马尼亚杰克跳蚁 阿德莱德36人 -4.5

7

9 Oct 2025, 06:22 UTC≈4,740 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

10月9日 足球赛事推荐 亚洲杯 16:00 文莱 vs 也门 文莱 +2 亚洲杯 17:00 巴基斯坦 vs 阿富汗 阿富汗 -0.5 亚洲杯 18:00 斯里兰卡 vs 土库曼斯坦 斯里兰卡 +0.51 亚洲杯 19:30 新加坡 vs 印度 全场小 22.5 亚洲杯 20:00 老挝 vs 马来西亚 老挝 +2.5 亚洲杯 20:30 泰国 vs 中国台湾 全场大 3.54 亚洲杯 20:30 越南 vs 尼泊尔 越南 -2.5 挪威U19 20:30 布兰U19 vs 利勒斯特罗姆U19 全场大 4.5 国际友谊 21:00 乌兹别克 vs 科威特 乌兹别克 -1.5 亚洲杯 22:00 孟加拉国 vs 中国香港 中国香港 -0.5 10月9日 篮球赛事推荐 澳国篮 16:30 阿德莱德36人 vs 塔斯马尼亚杰克跳蚁 阿德莱德36人 -4.5

2

9 Oct 2025, 05:04 UTC≈2,600 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

足坛早报 提前一轮进世界杯!萨拉赫双响 埃及3-0吉布提锁定世非预A组头名 本已首进世界杯🤬佛得角遭逆天误判绝杀被吹,外网球迷直接炸锅 世预赛-沙特3-2印尼 布赖坎两球迪克斯点射双响双方共进3粒点球 世预赛-阿曼0-0闷平卡塔尔 卡塔尔七成控球率&12脚射门仅2射正 官方:西甲17轮比利亚雷亚尔vs巴萨12月20日在迈阿密举行 C罗承认害怕秃顶:如果你看到我没头发了,那我就不是同一个人了 续约已搁置!塞尔:皇马认真考虑出售维尼修斯,哈兰德是首要目标 总价1.35亿!阿斯:西班牙人队易主,美国财团取代陈雁升成为老板 切费林:讲完C罗职业生涯成就得花超两小时,他绝对排在历史前三

2

6 Sept 2025, 14:19 UTC≈2,610 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

9月7日 早场足球赛事推荐 亚青U23 00:00 中华台北U23 vs 约旦U23 中华台北U23 +4.55 阿联酋杯 00:30 阿基曼 vs 艾尔维达 全场小 2.53 西乙 00:30 萨拉戈萨 vs 巴拉多利德 巴拉多利德 0 英乙 00:30 布罗雷 vs 吉林汉姆 全场小 22.5 荷乙 02:00 坎布尔 vs 威廉二世 全场小 2.53 欧洲预选 02:45 圣马力诺 vs 波黑 圣马力诺 +3 葡超 03:30 伊斯托里尔 vs 圣塔克莱拉 全场大 2 美职联 08:30 芝加哥火焰 vs 新英格兰革命 芝加哥火焰 -0.51 美职联 08:30 圣路易斯城 vs 达拉斯FC 圣路易斯城 -00.5 美职联 08:30 休斯敦迪纳摩 vs 洛杉矶银河 总进球 2-3

2

6 Sept 2025, 06:02 UTC≈1,740 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

9月6日 足球赛事推荐 亚青U23 15:30 东帝汶U23 vs 澳大利亚U23 澳大利亚U23 -55.5 球会友谊 17:00 克拉科夫 vs 涅波沃米采 克拉科夫 -0.51 日女联 17:00 INAC神户李奥内萨 vs 大阪樱花 INAC神户李奥内萨 -1.5 西协甲 18:00 艾尔德斯 vs 比雷亚雷亚尔B队 全场小 2 韩国K2 18:00 釜山IPark vs 水原三星 全场角球小 9 韩国K2 18:00 全南天龙 vs 首尔衣恋 全场小 2.5 韩国K2 18:00 忠北清州 vs 庆南 庆南 +00.5 韩国K2 18:00 城南 vs 安山绿人 全场打 22.5 中甲 19:00 大连鲲城 vs 定南赣联 定南赣联 +0.5 威超 19:30 巴拉城 vs 佩尼邦特 全场小 2.5 亚青U23 20:00 新加坡U23 vs 越南U2

1

5 Sept 2025, 12:34 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 13 August 2026

9月6日 早场足球赛事推荐 西协甲 01:15 贝蒂斯体育会 vs 塔拉戈纳 塔拉戈纳 0 荷乙 02:00 格拉芙夏普 vs 埃门 全场小 3 国际友谊 02:00 罗马尼亚 vs 加拿大 全场大 2.5 西女超 02:00 马德里竞技 vs 皇家马德里 皇家马德里 -00.5 英女超 02:30 切尔西 vs 曼城 切尔西 -0.51 世欧预选 02:45 斯洛文尼 vs 瑞典 瑞典 -00.5 世欧预选 02:45 瑞士 vs 科索沃 瑞士 -11.5 世欧预选 02:45 冰岛 vs 阿塞拜疆 冰岛 -1 世欧预选 02:45 黑山 vs 捷克 捷克 -0.51 世欧预选 02:45 丹麦 vs 苏格兰 苏格兰 +1 世欧预选 02:45 意大利 vs 爱沙尼亚 上半场大 1.52 9月6日 早场篮球赛事推荐 WNBA 07:30 亚特兰大梦想

5 Sept 2025, 06:11 UTC888 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

9月5日 足球赛事推荐 澳达超 17:00 卡苏阿利纳FC vs 达尔文港足球俱乐部 全场大 3.54 澳维超 17:00 黑德堡 vs 普雷斯顿莱恩 两队进球 是 澳维超 17:30 海德堡 vs 普雷斯顿莱恩 全场大 2.53 国际友谊 17:45 澳大利亚 vs 纽西兰 澳大利亚 -0.51 澳维甲 19:30 布伦瑞克城 vs 北鹰阳光 布伦瑞克城 -0.5 澳达超 19:00 阿祖里FC vs 达尔文奥林匹克 阿祖里FC 0 英乙U21 20:00 伯恩茅斯U21 vs 谢周三U21 谢周三U21 +11.5 中亚杯 20:00 土库曼斯坦 vs 阿曼 全场小 22.5 非洲预选 20:00 南苏丹 vs 刚果民主共和国 南苏丹 -11.5 球会友谊 20:00 凯泽斯劳滕 vs 海登海姆 全场大 2.5 非洲预选 21:00 纳米比亚 vs 马拉维

4 Sept 2025, 14:16 UTC639 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

9月5日 早场足球赛事推荐 国际友谊 00:30 阿联酋 vs 叙利亚 叙利亚 -00.5 国际友谊 01:00 俄罗斯 vs 约旦 俄罗斯 -11.5 欧洲预选 02:45 斯洛伐克 vs 德国 德国-1.5 欧洲预选 02:45 保加利亚 vs 西班牙 西班牙上半场 -1 欧洲预选 02:45 荷兰 vs 波兰 荷兰 -1.5 非洲预选 03:00 阿尔及利亚 vs 博茨瓦纳 全场大 2.5 非洲预选 03:00 突尼斯 vs 利比里亚 突尼斯 -1.5 南美预选 07:30 阿根廷 vs 委内瑞拉 阿根廷 -1.52 9月5日 早场篮球赛事推荐 WNBA 07:30 华盛顿神秘人(女) vs 凤凰城水星(女) 全场小 159.5 WNBA 10:00 拉斯维加斯王牌(女) vs 明尼苏达山猫(女) 拉斯维加斯王牌(女)总分大 80.5 WNBA 10

1

4 Sept 2025, 07:55 UTC546 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

LOL -LCK 韩国冠军联赛-入围赛 16:00 DK 🆚 BFX BO5 全局获胜: DK 地图让分: 3-1 地图比分: DK-1.5 (重心) 地图大小: 小于4.5 第一局获胜:DK 第一局击杀让分: DK-6.5 (重心) 第一局击杀大小: 小于31.5 第一局时间大小: 小于33 第一滴血:DK

1

4 Sept 2025, 06:15 UTC548 viewsread 13 August 2026

9月4日 足球赛事推荐 球会友谊 16:30 沙斯辛 vs 莱茨纳 沙斯辛 -1.5 泰王杯 17:00 伊拉克 vs 中国香港 全场小 2.53 韩女联 18:00 世宗 vs 闻庆尚武 闻庆尚武 +00.5 球会友谊 19:30 格拉茨青年队 vs 弗洛里茨多夫 弗洛里茨多夫 0 球会友谊 19:30 阿富汗 vs 印度 印度 -0.5 国际友谊 21:00 马来西亚 vs 新加坡 马来西亚 -1.52 非洲预选 21:00 乍得 vs 加纳 全场大 3 泰王杯 21:00 泰国 vs 斐济 泰国 -3 俄甲 22:00 科斯特罗马斯巴达 vs 乌拉尔 全场大 1.52 国际友谊 23:00 沙特阿拉伯 vs 北马其顿 北马其顿 0 9月4日 篮球赛事推荐 中篮联 19:30 香港金牛 vs 石家庄翔蓝 全场小 188.5

3 Sept 2025, 14:59 UTC944 viewsread 13 August 2026

刀塔-CIS之战-《总决赛》 23:00 OG 🆚 L1ge (BO5) 全局获胜:OG 地图比分:3-0 3-1 地图让分:OG-1.5 地图大小: 小于4.5 第一局获胜:OG 第一局击杀让分:OG -6.5 第一局击杀大小:小于56.5 (重心) 第一局时间大小:小于38 第一滴血:L1ge

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tiyu09. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 762,588 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“体育推单|足球推单|电竞推单” (@tiyu09), 9,889 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiyu09.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.