Channel
@ybtytd
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
163,322subscribers
+54,804 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001718222921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ybtytd |
| Description | 体育赛事推单 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ybtytd |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 163,322 | +5,444 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 157,878 | +3,569 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 154,309 | +4,014 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 150,295 | +3,864 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 146,431 | +4,780 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 141,651 | +2,741 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 138,910 | +1,532 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 137,378 | +1,980 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 135,398 | +2,452 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:54 | 132,946 | +2,432 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 130,514 | +1,690 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 128,824 | +3,358 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 125,466 | +1,337 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 124,129 | +3,223 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 120,906 | +2,410 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 118,496 | +547 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 117,949 | +1,813 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 116,136 | +2,306 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 113,830 | +1,956 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 111,874 | first reading |
527 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 100 of 331 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 527 (13 August 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 956,991 |
| Reactions total | 94 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 21:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
120 reactions across 110 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 53 | 44.2% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 9.17% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 9.17% | |
| 🎉 | 10 | 8.33% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 8.33% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 5.83% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.00% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 527 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 527 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
0⃣【开云-9月29日 0点整 欧国联 拉脱维亚 vs 塞浦路斯】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 0点整 欧国联 格鲁吉亚 vs 乌克兰】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 2点30分 西乙 莱加内斯 vs 卡斯特利翁】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 2点45分 欧国联 比利时 vs 法国】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 2点45分 欧国联 土耳其 vs 意大利】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 2点45分 欧国联 北爱尔兰 vs 匈牙利】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 2点45分 欧国联 罗马尼亚 vs 波黑】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 2点45分 欧国联 瑞典 vs 波兰】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 6点30分 巴乙 米内罗美洲MG vs 尤文图德RS】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 18点整 国际友谊 澳大利亚 vs 巴西】 0⃣【开云-9月30日 0点整 欧国联 芬兰 vs 白俄罗斯】 0⃣【开云-9月30日 2点45分 欧国联 西班牙 vs 克罗地亚】 0⃣【开云-9月…
❤3
0⃣【开云-10月1日 18点10分 友谊赛 日本 vs 厄瓜多尔】 数据初盘开出全场让球：日本-0.5，机构倾向主队优势。国际友谊赛，日本暂时世界排名第17，近年主场长期保持不败战绩，球队攻防有序，配合默契，韧性十足，整体表现相当稳定。客队遭受两连败，防守能力下降明显，表现欠稳，状态低迷。两队近期整体发挥相比之下日本队更为出色，近年整体实力相对更强，另加主场优势，综合分析本场看好日本获胜。 全场让球：日本[email protected] 全场大小：小2/[email protected] 推荐比分：1-0
0⃣【开云-10月1日 10点整 美冠联 萨克拉门托 vs 拉斯维加斯之光】 数据初盘开出主队-1，说明机构对萨克拉门托实力的认可。主队近期战绩相当稳定，近10场各类赛事取得4胜5平1负。球队自8月初以来已连续8轮联赛保持不败，上一轮客场面对新墨西哥联以3-2取胜，主场近4战也斩获2胜2平不败战绩，攻防两端与主场抢分能力较为可靠。客队近10场比赛取得4胜3平3负。虽然球队主场近来遭遇连败状态有所起伏，但客场发挥颇具亮点，近4个客场取得3胜1负韧性十足，客场具备较强的反击威慑力。综合分析，本场看好拉斯维加斯之光客场不败。 全场让球：拉斯维加斯之光[email protected] 全场大小：小[email protected] 推荐比分：1-1
0⃣【开云-10月1日 9点整 哥伦甲 国民竞技 vs 巴兰基亚青年】 数据方面机构开出主队让1，给予实力的肯定。国民竞技近期状态出色，近10场取得7胜2平1负，整体表现十分稳定，攻防两端都展现出较强竞争力。巴兰基亚青年近10场仅取得2胜4平4负，取胜能力相对有限，近期比赛走势也不够稳定。两队目前状态存在明显差异，国民竞技坐镇主场具备较强的主动权，球队近期稳定的拿分能力也值得关注。结合双方近期表现及主场优势，本场倾向国民竞技取得胜利。 全场让球：国民竞技[email protected] 全场大小：小2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-0
0⃣【开云-10月1日 8点整 美冠联 塔尔萨 vs 新墨西哥联】 数据初盘开出主队-0.5，说明机构对塔尔萨实力的认可。主队近期整体表现较为稳健，近10场各类赛事取得4胜3平3负。球队风格偏向稳健，纪律性较强。近5轮联赛取得1胜3平1负，回归主场后攻防运转更为稳定。客队近10场比赛4胜4平2负。打法相对开放，近期防守端隐患暴露，近4轮联赛3平1负难求一胜。近两场比赛狂丢5球，防线状态下滑明显。综合分析，本场看好塔尔萨利用主场之利完成复仇。 全场让球：塔尔萨[email protected] 全场大小：大2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-1
⚡1
0⃣【开云-10月1日 7点30分 美职联 纽约红牛 vs 圣路易斯城】 数据初盘开出客队-0.5，说明机构对圣路易斯城实力的认可。主队目前以26轮9胜6平11负积33分暂列东部第8位。球队近期状态有所回暖，近两个客场爆冷拿下两连胜。但主场表现持续低迷，近3个主场仅取得1平2负未尝胜绩，主场统治力明显不足。客队目前以26轮12胜8平6负积44分高居西部第5位。球队近期进攻火力全开，近10场各项赛事取得6胜4平保持不败，近期更是豪取三连胜，进攻端火力十足。近4场比赛场均打进3球以上，防守跑动积极，拦截到位。综合分析，本场看好圣路易斯城客场取胜。 全场让球：圣路易斯城[email protected] 全场大小：大3/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-4
🔥1
0⃣【开云-10月1日 4点整 秘鲁甲 西恩夏诺 vs 洛斯香卡斯】 数据初盘开出全场让球：西恩夏诺-1/1.5，机构倾向主队优势。秘鲁甲级联赛第10轮，主队近期主场胜率高，优势较为明显，前场把握进球能力强，整体表现相对出色。客队已遭受五连败，球队防守薄弱，表现甚差，状态持续低迷。两队近五场交锋西恩夏诺2胜2平1负占优，近年整体实力更胜一筹，另加主场之利，综合分析本场看好主队获胜。 全场让球：西恩夏诺-1/[email protected] 全场大小：大3/[email protected] 推荐比分：3-1
👏1
0⃣【开云-10月1日 3点整 欧女冠 本菲卡(女) vs 拜仁慕尼黑(女)】 数据方面机构对于客队后续拿分能力给予肯定，盘口开出客队让1.5球。本菲卡首轮客场2比1击败尤文图斯，球队士气得到提升，但此前欧战防守稳定性仍有不足。拜仁首轮主场2比2战平曼城，整体实力依旧强劲，且欧冠经验更为丰富。双方此前4次欧战交锋，拜仁取得3胜1平保持不败，心理优势较为明显。此役拜仁在阵容厚度、个人能力及比赛经验方面占优，看好客队发挥实力，反客为主拿下胜利。 全场让球：拜仁慕尼黑(女)[email protected] 全场大小：大[email protected] 推荐比分：1-3
🔥1
0⃣【开云-10月1日 0点整 国际友谊 立陶宛 vs 安道尔】 数据方面机构开出主队让0.5/1，给予实力的认可。立陶宛近10场取得2胜3平5负，整体表现虽不算突出，但相比安道尔仍具备一定优势，球队主场作战也有望提升比赛积极性。安道尔近10场仅取得1胜2平7负，近期取胜能力较弱，进攻端持续性不足，面对压力时防守也容易出现问题。结合双方近期状态及整体实力，立陶宛本场坐镇主场具备一定主动权，有望抓住机会取得胜利。 全场让球：立陶宛-0.5/[email protected] 全场大小：小2/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-0
0⃣【开云-9月30日 18点30分 亚运男足 乌兹别克斯坦U23 vs 日本U23】 数据方面机构向客队方向倾斜，盘口开出客队让0.5球。乌兹别克斯坦U23此前小组赛三战全胜，1/4决赛又3比0击败沙特，攻防表现较为稳定。日本U23同样保持全胜，1/4决赛1比0淘汰朝鲜，防守端连续保持零封，整体发挥十分稳健。双方近年交锋较为接近，不过日本整体技术能力和传控水平出色，比赛节奏控制能力更强。此役两队实力接近，日本U23临场执行力值得信赖，看好其客场取胜。 全场让球：日本[email protected] 全场大小：大[email protected] 推荐比分：1-2
👏1
0⃣【开云-9月30日 14点整 亚运男足 韩国U23 vs 中国U23】 数据方面机构对于韩国U23实力给予肯定，盘口开出韩国U23让1/1.5球。韩国队本届赛事表现强势，小组赛保持全胜，1/4决赛更是4比0大胜越南，进攻火力十分突出。中国队则保持不败，1/4决赛3比0完胜泰国，防守端表现稳健。此役韩国整体实力及旅欧球员配置占优，但中国队防守韧性较强，反击也具威胁。机构给出主队让步较深，恐难以顺利打出，故本场看好中国U23坚守指数为佳。 全场让球：中国U23+1/[email protected] 全场大小：小2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：1-1
0⃣【开云-9月28日 0点整 欧国联 丹麦 vs 威尔士】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 0点整 欧国联 塞尔维亚 vs 荷兰】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 0点整 欧国联 奥地利 vs 科索沃】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 2点45分 欧国联 德国 vs 希腊】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 2点45分 欧国联 以色列 vs 爱尔兰】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 2点45分 欧国联 挪威 vs 葡萄牙】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 3点整 西乙 皇家奥维耶多 vs 希洪竞技】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 7点整 美职联 哥伦布机员 vs 迈阿密国际】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 18点25分 国际友谊 日本 vs 委内瑞拉】 0⃣【开云-9月28日 19点整 国际友谊 韩国 vs 乌拉圭】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 0点整 欧国联 拉脱维亚 vs 塞浦路斯】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 0点整 欧国联 格鲁吉亚 vs 乌克兰】 0⃣【开云-9月29日 2点30分 西…
Showing the 12 most recent of 527 posts we hold for @ybtytd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@ybtytd edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“推单体育赛事推荐足球篮球推单” (@ybtytd), 163,322 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ybtytd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.