Комикс про обезьяну, которая делает бизнес🦍
Задать Бу вопрос по бизнесу: questionsforbubot.t.me
Написать по рекламе: @amoblogreklama или https://telega.in/c/amoblog
https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=675937a335130d72364cc79a®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 63 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,894–31,151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 06:21
30,931
+7
4 Oct 2026, 17:18
30,924
-95
26 Sept 2026, 17:40
31,019
-1
19 Sept 2026, 13:39
31,020
-57
17 Sept 2026, 04:19
31,077
-16
15 Sept 2026, 01:21
31,093
-11
13 Sept 2026, 11:58
31,104
-13
11 Sept 2026, 18:35
31,117
+1
9 Sept 2026, 07:38
31,116
+7
5 Sept 2026, 21:00
31,109
-11
3 Sept 2026, 17:15
31,120
+4
2 Sept 2026, 08:24
31,116
+7
1 Sept 2026, 10:36
31,109
-9
31 Aug 2026, 12:48
31,118
+9
29 Aug 2026, 12:26
31,109
-11
28 Aug 2026, 14:22
31,120
-1
27 Aug 2026, 14:19
31,121
+16
26 Aug 2026, 16:34
31,105
+6
25 Aug 2026, 19:24
31,099
+23
24 Aug 2026, 22:44
31,076
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.9%
avg views ÷ 30,931 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,800
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held
28 (24 March 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total
64,780
Reactions total
1,238
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Oct 2026, 17:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
673
Links
125
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
7,246 reactions across 28 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5429338355819105767
2,203
30.4%
custom 5429565739977691109
1,721
23.8%
💯
850
11.7%
🍌
665
9.18%
🎉
656
9.05%
custom 5399971100320865739
368
5.08%
😁
265
3.66%
🫡
211
2.91%
🤣
174
2.40%
😨
74
1.02%
😢
36
0.497%
custom 5429264568280959313
23
0.317%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
43
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 28 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amoblog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 9 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
14.3%
4 of 28 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
9,850
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
22,400
over 24 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzausL7ik
1
22 September 2026
22 September 2026
2VtzqvqmJGT
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2VtzqxathXJ
1
29 September 2026
29 September 2026
2W5zFJQ2GfK
1
9 October 2026
9 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 9 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Клиенту не перезвонили. Договорённость забыли. Материалы ещё готовятся.
В продажах время уходит не только на поиск клиентов. После звонка нужно поставить задачу, после встречи записать договорённости, перед следующим разговором подготовить материалы. Когда эти шаги затягиваются или пропускаются, руководителю приходится разбираться вручную.
На AI Cases Conf поможем:
• Замечать пропущенные действия после звонка. В Каб…
У меня две новости. Хорошая и плохая.
Плохая новость: нейросети забирают у нас работу. Они уже пишут тексты, анализируют данные, собирают презентации, ищут ошибки в документах, помогают с маркетингом, делают фотосессии и дизайнят рекламные баннеры.
Хорошая новость: если научиться работать с ИИ, можно меньше работать и больше зарабатывать 🦍
На курсе «Нейросети на практике: для себя, работы и бизнеса» от Академии Эд…
🇨🇳Китайцы умеют производить почти всё. Как заработать на этом в России?
Найти товар или производителя в Китае сейчас не самая сложная задача. А вот дальше начинается квест: договориться, оплатить, оформить документы, пройти сертификацию, растаможить, довезти и не обнаружить по дороге, что экономика проекта внезапно стала очень грустной.
Для предпринимателей, которые работают с китайскими поставщиками, Альфа-Банк за…
Йоу! Не устал разгребать всё вручную и наблюдать, как кто-то в это время попивает коктейльчик под пальмой и получает на 30% больше?
Пока ты переносишь данные из таблички в табличку, собираешь отчёты, отвечаешь на типовые письма и следишь, чтобы ничего не потерялось, большие боссы топовых компаний отдают операционку ИИшке и гребут премии за перевыполнение планов.
Но есть нюанс: просто написать в ChatGPT «сделай мне …
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @amoblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
БИЗНЕС ИДЕИ @idei_biznes · 26,862 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Dental Books Free @M_Dental_Books · 23,665 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
По ходу разберёмся @pohodu_media · 28,119 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“амоБлог” (@amoblog), 30,931 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amoblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
