Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 50 days, net -201. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,135–25,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 19:38
25,165
-29
17 Sept 2026, 06:01
25,194
-13
15 Sept 2026, 03:57
25,207
-1
13 Sept 2026, 12:19
25,208
+1
11 Sept 2026, 14:57
25,207
+6
8 Sept 2026, 23:01
25,201
-17
5 Sept 2026, 13:57
25,218
-8
3 Sept 2026, 11:59
25,226
-13
2 Sept 2026, 03:29
25,239
-1
1 Sept 2026, 02:35
25,240
-15
31 Aug 2026, 03:36
25,255
+7
30 Aug 2026, 00:43
25,248
+9
29 Aug 2026, 00:35
25,239
-5
28 Aug 2026, 03:17
25,244
-3
27 Aug 2026, 03:54
25,247
-5
26 Aug 2026, 04:34
25,252
+2
25 Aug 2026, 05:34
25,250
-9
24 Aug 2026, 03:43
25,259
-6
22 Aug 2026, 08:14
25,265
-14
21 Aug 2026, 01:52
25,279
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 24 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 25,165 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,510
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.776%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held
24 (24 March 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total
22,050
Reactions total
171
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 23:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
499
Videos
29
Links
738
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,728 reactions across 24 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
407
23.6%
❤🔥
354
20.5%
🐳
300
17.4%
⚡
260
15.0%
custom 5267137657460246696
171
9.90%
💯
159
9.20%
custom 5866156681808842536
77
4.46%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,728 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 24 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ProMintChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 March 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пруфы о взломе Bitget 🚨🚨🚨
Мне до сих пор не вывели и никому вообще
https://arkm.com/explorer/address/0x770b10b273fC44Fe9197D6bF20F145c2e98463Ee
Хакер продолжает дёргать деньги с биржи
И это не похоже на переброс от биржи, ибо потом уже идёт отмыв на фреш валеты другие. Самое главное что меняют токены типа $USDT на $ETH чтобы не заморозил эмитент.
Обязательно поставьте на вывод бабки, ибо когда такое происходит в…
Variational гем или рект ❔
Вместо анонса о TGE сегодня мы получили новость о продление фарма в Q4 и давайте разбираться:
- Еженедельное распределение 150 000 баллов.
- Распределение Genesis (32% Airdrop): 100% разлок на TGE.
- 100% выручки направляется в казну для обратного выкупа и сжигания токена $VAR.
- Чтобы получить дроп требуется минимум 1 Point на аккаунт! Подкрутите актив на мелких аках
Что ожидается до TG…
Запись за 22 Сентября 2026▶️
Обсудили мою текущую стратеги, мои активности в рынке и почему сейчас ПРОТИВОПОКАЗАНО сидеть афк в рынке. Деньги и exit liquidity возвращаются на рынок, время собирать урожай. Спалил пару гем проектов, которые сейчас отрабатываю или планирую отработать. Разобрал вопросы от подписчиков, получилось интересно, ориентируйтесь по таймкодам.
00:00 - О чём будет Voice
04:22 - Моя стратегия про…
Сегодня 19:00 по МСК прямой эфир
Время Lock In режима и заработка денег в крипте наступило. Расскажу что думаю про рынок, какие активности делаю и какие проекты нравятся прямо сейчас. Поотвечаю на ваши вопросы и разберём Robinhood мету, что я там купил и почему.
Форма для вопросов
▶️ Трансляция
Сегодня 19:00 по МСК прямой эфир
Рынок сильно изменился. И навыки фармить дропы, флипать NFT, абузить механики и заполнять сотни форм уже мало где применимы.
На эфир с Секретным Максом, CragHack и Max Wayld обсудим новые opportunities в крипте, какие скиллы стоит прокачивать уже сейчас, чтобы зарабатывать на них даже на медвежке, а на бычьем рынке ещё больше.
Как с нуля раскачать Twitter, находить контент и тренд…
Аирдропы сдохли. 0 дропов за 2026 😱
Год назад я начал говорить, что мета ретродропов умерла.
Мне отвечали: «Рынок просто очищается».
И я как раз предполагал, что мы наблюдаем не перезагрузку, а смерть направления в том виде, в котором его знали.
Посмотрите на график сделок в крипту на скрине. Пик 2021 привлекли рекордные $33,8 млрд через 2 018 сделок. Это больше, чем за все предыдущие годы вместе взятые. Сейчас мы…
Запись за 14 Июля 2026▶️
Пообсуждали текущие меты, темы для заработка через билдинг и медийку. Почему в рынке остались только самые крепкие и с дополнительным заработком.
00:00 - Текущие настроения
09:50 - Текущая мем-вспышка
16:25 - Специально ли качали $CASHCAT
22:35 - Почему $ANSEM не взлетел
28:37 - Как поменялся рынок
37:14 - Отработка Tempo и ARC
49:22 - BSC скам
53:00 - Трамп уничтожил рынок
59:20 - Rbinhood…
Сегодня 19:00 по МСК прямой эфир
На стриме будет Вишня и Votesa, обсудим актуальные способы заработка в крипте сейчас, какие проекты кто делает и что сейчас вообще происходит на рынке. Зацепим мемчики, создание и продвижение своих проектов в крипте, задавайте вопросы, на всё ответим.
Форма для вопросов
▶️ Трансляция
Strategy продала 3,588 BTC на ~$225.6 млн 🟠
Как раз $BTC с 30 Июня по 1 Июля поставил локальный лой в ~$57.800, по всей видимости на этих продажах.
Продажа укладывается в объявленный на прошлой неделе механизм: компания разрешила себе продавать BTC на сумму до $1.25 млрд для пополнения долларового резерва и выплат по обязательствам. По сути можем увидеть ещё продажи почти на миллиард.
Источник: https://www.strateg…
Плюсовой игрок миф или реальность 😳
🇮🇳 Индия / SEBI
93% индивидуальных трейдеров в equity F&O ушли в минус за 3 года. Только 1% трейдеров заработал больше $1k после всех расходов
🇪🇺 Европа / ESMA
74–89% retail CFD-счетов теряют деньги
🇫🇷 Франция / AMF
Больше 89% retail-инвесторов потеряли деньги на CFD/Forex за 4 года. Средний убыток — около €10,887. Регулятор отдельно отмечал, что чем больше люди торгуют, тем бол…
Запись за 23 Июня 2026▶️
Рассказал на чём можем словить следующие падение и где дно у крипты. Спалил краймы и текущие активности в крипте. Приятного просмотра!
00:00 - Настроения рынков
09:00 - Сценарий падения
17:25 - Рынок улетит без меня
27:47 - Безопасное хранение $BTC
33:33 - Обзор $CC Canton
39:28 - $PUMP покупать или нет
44:25 - $HYPE vs $LIT
49:10 - $SOL 25% инфляция в год
55:40 - Популярное мнение надо рев…
Сегодня 19:00 по МСК прямой эфир
Поговорим за изменения на рынке, как приспособиться к текущим реалиям и как заработать на всём происходящем. Какие активы буду отупать, сделаю разбор некоторых монеток и почему от каких-то стоит держаться подальше.
Форма для вопросов
▶️ Трансляция
🔥36❤🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ProMintChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PROFIT MAFIA @ProfiT_Mafia · 35,469 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Coin Metrika @CoinMetrika · 34,886 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
SWIPER @swiper_money · 28,346 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Max Zarev @maxzarev · 25,143 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
FACK BLOCK RESEARCH @fackblock · 24,897 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
IDO research @idoresearch · 57,177 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io @slavik_investor · 24,783 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?! @BogdanGdeX · 25,977 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Sergey (ICO Drops) заметки @icodrops_sergey · 42,868 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
PROFIT DRIVE @profit_drive · 21,855 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
криптапиражок @cryppi · 30,433 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
Steamify - Фарми скины CS2 @steamify · 40,439 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
Whitelist Media @whitelist1 · 41,611 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
CryptoEarn Important @CryptoEarnImp · 27,966 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
moni talks [крипта] @moni_talks · 24,884 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 September 2026
Crypto & AI Updates | Славик инвестор @Slavik_investor_updates · 20,746 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
Кэпитал News @drops_daily · 21,260 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026
PROCENT @procent_crypto · 21,500 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA @swoptoky · 31,527 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Климченко | про криптовалюту @thevse · 35,323 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog @don_invest · 38,578 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ @slezisatoshi · 123,780 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Liberty ICO | Crypto @libertycryptoq · 20,849 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
DEFI Scam Check @Defiscamcheck · 48,614 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProMint” (@ProMintChannel), 25,165 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProMintChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.