Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -645. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,188–19,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:38
18,285
-33
17 Sept 2026, 05:18
18,318
-15
15 Sept 2026, 04:01
18,333
-23
13 Sept 2026, 09:40
18,356
-36
11 Sept 2026, 12:35
18,392
-71
8 Sept 2026, 16:40
18,463
-74
5 Sept 2026, 09:42
18,537
-22
2 Sept 2026, 09:46
18,559
-22
1 Sept 2026, 12:56
18,581
-12
31 Aug 2026, 15:14
18,593
-18
30 Aug 2026, 12:05
18,611
-17
29 Aug 2026, 09:44
18,628
-22
28 Aug 2026, 08:26
18,650
-7
27 Aug 2026, 09:19
18,657
-15
26 Aug 2026, 06:55
18,672
-18
25 Aug 2026, 03:18
18,690
-20
23 Aug 2026, 22:33
18,710
-25
22 Aug 2026, 07:08
18,735
-22
20 Aug 2026, 19:05
18,757
-21
19 Aug 2026, 17:57
18,778
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 18,285 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
23 (26 June 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
2,670
Reactions total
43
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 02:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
801 reactions across 23 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🐳
211
26.3%
👍
204
25.5%
💯
63
7.87%
🌚
56
6.99%
🍌
56
6.99%
🤡
44
5.49%
🔥
35
4.37%
💩
22
2.75%
🖕
18
2.25%
🤬
18
2.25%
😎
16
2.00%
👨💻
13
1.62%
🆒
10
1.25%
💊
7
0.874%
🎄
6
0.749%
🤪
6
0.749%
🤮
6
0.749%
😍
5
0.624%
😈
3
0.375%
👎
2
0.25%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 801 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 23 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @money_byrostic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Всем продуктивного дня. Апдейты по проектам:
• Base
Для тех, кто делал компанию от Base App, чекайте свои аккаунты, награды за промо уже там.
• Canopy
Если отрабатывали проект и собирали поинты, тима открыла регистрацию на клейм дропа. Регистрируемся по ссылке.
• Flop
Саня Хейс запустил новый проект, без фондов и токенсейла. Сейчас можно залететь в тестнет под будущий дроп $FLOP. Тыкаемся на сайте.
• Dymension
По…
Где все люди и чего ждать дальше?
Пока август медленно подводит нас к финальной прямой 2026 года и если вам кажется, что в стаканах пусто, а в чатах тишина — вам не кажется. Разбираем, что произошло с рынком за эти 8 месяцев.
• Активность ритейла на нуле
В начале года рынок пережил все ожидания BTC успел обновить хаи, перешагнув $100K, после чего ушел в затяжную коррекцию. И если институционалы продолжают тихо скуп…
Всем продуктивного дня. Апдейты по проектам:
• Взломы
Уже любимая рубрика. Там блокчейн Harmony (юзали во времена LZ) взломали, хакеры через «пустые блоки» несанкционированно выпустили 4 млрд ONE (26% от общего предложения). Токен проекта обвалился на 20%+.
• Ethereum
Проект обновил свой roadmap, теперь главный фокус на квантовой защите, приватности, масштабировании, STARKs, AI-верификации и упрощении протокола. Ко…
Всем продуктивного дня. Апдейты по проектам:
• Негатив
Взломы проектов видели, закрытие бирж тоже. На днях хакеры увели 70М$ с холодных кошельков Coldcard, поэтому максимально аккуратно храним свои средства.
• Zero
Уже ранее писал о закрытии сети проектом, но все же напомню, что нужно вывести свои деньги через оф. мост до 7 августа.
• Espresso
Помним такой проект? Тима открыла клейм бустов за стейкинг. Все eligibl…
😀Получаем Gemini Pro за 0,2$ в месяц! Как и где сделать
• Нашел годный магазин, где куча аккаунтов ИИ по низким ценам, причем фул гарантия и можно вернуть чуть что покупку.
Что там есть?
💬 Claude Code
💬 Grok
🤖 Gemini
💬 ChatGPT
🫴 Cursor
🌉Оплата автоматически через Bybit, СБП, криптой, TG stars.
Поддержка не дремлет и помогает со всем, в общем очень полезный сервис для всех кто кодит или создает контент, цены в…
📹Как поднять ПЕРВЫЕ $1000 в крипте БЕЗ ВЛОЖЕНИЙ
👉ВИДЕО — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiXZaIwg1kg
👉ВИДЕО — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiXZaIwg1kg
— На Youtube канале вышло новое видео.
• Всем приятного просмотра
Rostic | Chat | Youtube
Всем продуктивного дня. Апдейты по проектам:
• Base Sybil Resistance
Система борьбы с сибилами перед вашими глазами. Если коротко, то если у вас нет аккаунта на Coinbase, прокаченного Х и так далее то вы сибил. Подробнее читаем здесь.
• LayerZero
Покерист отключит поддержку малопопулярных сетей, поэтому юзеров Stargate v2 просят заранее вывести активы и перевести их в поддерживаемые сети.
• Base
Там в BaseApp разд…
Pumplyx
• Годный проект на ранней стадии. Pumplyx — представляет из себя полноценную экосистему: игра, собственный кошелек, маркетплейс с NFT. У проекта подтвержден дроп (малое количество участников, поэтому можно смело зафармить дроп).
👉Что нужно сделать чтобы претендовать на дроп?:
1. Скачать игру на телефон (Google play / App Store), есть везде.
2. Там же скачиваем кошелек.
3. Проходим регистрацию в игре и вводи…
Всем продуктивного дня. Апдейты по проектам:
• Polymarket
Если отрабатываете проект, то необходимо привязать дискорд к вашему профилю. Сделать это можно в настройках аккаунта.
• Robinhood
На днях взломали Х их CЕО и опубликовали контракт токена, который в итоге рагнули, поэтому поаккуратнее с такими исторяими.
• Биржи все
BitMEX объявила о закрытии 23 сентября, если у вас там средства выводим. Медвежка не щадит да…
Всем продуктивного дня. Апдейты по проектам:
• Взломы
Мост Allbridge был подвержен взлому, увели $1.7M. Хакер взял в кредит более $1,1М USDC и сманипулировал курсом в пуле USDC/USDT. После чего курс улетел, и свапая USDT в USDC в пике разница курсов составила 560 раз.
• Robinhood
Если активничали в их экосистеме, можете проверить себя на первый дроп. Чекаем кошелек по ссылке.
• Meteora
Эх были времена солана крайм…
Всем продуктивного дня. Апдейты по проектам:
• Взлом
Уже каждая подборка начинается со взлома. Вчера ломанули перп Ostium, хакерам удалось увести 18М$. Надеюсь вы не пострадали.
• MetaMask
10 лет без токена, зато можем посмотреть свою ончейн активность на сайте. Спасибо лисам, за эти удивительные 10 лет.
• Canopy
О проекте рассказывал здесь. Проект изменил систему поинтов, теперь награды начисляются еженедельно вм…
Второй полуфинал ЧМ уже сегодня. Возможно последний матч на ЧМ для Лени Чмесси
• Зарядил 500$ на ТБ 2.5. Кэф прям приятный, может легко здесь зайти, обе команды хорошо забивают. На бумаге конечно Англия посильнее выглядит, но дитя фифы на диком фарте летит, поэтому выбирать победителя здесь = играть в рулетку.
• Хотел бы конечно увидеть финал Месси — Ямаль, было бы довольно эпично. Поглядим сегодня, что покажет пол…
💯8👍6🤡6🌚4
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @money_byrostic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Drive @drivecrypto · 27,480 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
❄️Bad Santa AI&Crypto @BadSantaDrop · 22,115 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 September 2026
Crypto mnst [Youtube] @mnstmoney · 25,431 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto Night @cryyptonight · 24,584 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA @swoptoky · 31,630 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Money by Rostic” (@money_byrostic), 18,285 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/money_byrostic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.