Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MOSKVICH BAND

Channel

MOSKVICH BAND

@moskvichband

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,249subscribers

+79 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001320120703
TypeChannel
Username@moskvichband
DescriptionMOSKVICH BAND — медиапроект о жизни улиц, футболе и околофутболе. / ex. #дневникфаната Народная Команда: @mediakomanda По вопросам сотрудничества: @koroldorog Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68dfb23cea5b44a9135eca90
Created22 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/moskvichband

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@fratria2005/319335 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC@moskvichband/12332 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC1.002.1 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@fratria20057 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0059 minutesthis entry (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 117 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

15,14215,56015,35115,2496 August 202612 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 98 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,079–15,623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 02:3115,249-12
8 Nov 2026, 18:0815,261+8
7 Nov 2026, 10:0615,253-3
6 Nov 2026, 07:3615,256-7
5 Nov 2026, 04:5015,263-3
4 Nov 2026, 05:4515,266-15
2 Nov 2026, 05:3615,281+21
1 Nov 2026, 04:0915,260+6
31 Oct 2026, 02:1115,254+6
30 Oct 2026, 00:3915,248-3
28 Oct 2026, 21:2515,251+5
27 Oct 2026, 19:3715,246+87
26 Oct 2026, 22:3515,159+17
25 Oct 2026, 23:0415,142-16
25 Oct 2026, 01:5715,158+3
23 Oct 2026, 23:5615,155-6
22 Oct 2026, 23:4115,161-14
21 Oct 2026, 19:0615,175-6
20 Oct 2026, 16:2915,181+13
19 Oct 2026, 19:4015,168first reading

Engagement

233 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 15,249 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
70
of 233 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held233 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total165,830
Reactions total6,549
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,100
Videos
≈2,530
Links
≈2,960

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
48m 09s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

22,608 reactions across 226 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,74334.2%
custom 52763648105801518604,14318.3%
🔥2,94713.0%
custom 52490226794066412032,52311.2%
👍1,8208.05%
😁1,4486.40%
custom 54743300580950753058773.88%
custom 53391319866299173174922.18%
custom 52247080234354046373401.50%
custom 52625330874467188872751.22%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 233 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 233 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
144
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 232 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
125
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moskvichband. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 233 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 70 posts held from the last 30 days (18.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,270 views133 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @wfcsmVideo

ОДИН ЗА ВСЕХ — И ВСЕ ЗА ОДНОГО ❤️🤍

❤85custom 527636481058015186033🔥12custom 52625330874467188873

14 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈1,800 views180 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

ГРОМИМ ЛОШАДОК В ДЕРБИ!

custom 5276364810580151860133❤30👍17

14 Nov 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,760 views114 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

ЧТО ЗА ГОЛ! Выходим вперед в дерби! Вперед, «Спартак»!

❤71custom 527636481058015186030custom 533913198662991731713

14 Nov 2026, 11:12 UTC≈2,260 views117 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

ДОРОЖЕ ВСЕХ НАГРАД! Второй перфоманс красно-белых на дерби! Напоминаем, что девчонки из ЖФК «Спартак» принимали участие в подготовке сегодняшних перфомансов! Кайф!

custom 524902267940664120384custom 527636481058015186026❤7

14 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,810 views96 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

ГУДЕЖ! Классная атмосфера сегодня на дерби!

❤66custom 527636481058015186022custom 52490226794066412038

14 Nov 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,840 views85 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

ДАВАЙ ЕЩЁ!🫶 Бодрое начало матча. Десятая минута и счет 1:1.

❤57custom 527636481058015186025👍3

14 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,970 views136 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

ВСЯ РОССИЯ, ВСЯ МОСКВА! НЕНАВИДИТ ЦСКА! Перекличка между красно-белыми трибунами.

❤84custom 527636481058015186041🔥11

14 Nov 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,900 views166 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

НИКАКИЕ СТАТУСЫ НЕ ПЕРЕВЕСЯТ НАРОДНУЮ ЛЮБОВЬ! Первый перфоманс от Красно-Белых на сегодняшнем женском дерби! Погнали!

custom 5249022679406641203109❤34custom 527636481058015186023

14 Nov 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,810 views118 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤52custom 527636481058015186040🔥16custom 547433005809507530510

14 Nov 2026, 07:03 UTC≈2,150 views209 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

ВИТЯ — С ДНЁМ РОЖДЕНИЯ! Сегодня очередной день рождения отмечает наш друг, соведущий, заводящий трибуны и просто хороший человек — Витя! Будь здоров! Пусть мегафон всегда будет заряжен, «Красно-белые регионы» и дайджесты продолжают развиваться, а ты сам не знал бед и хлопот! С днём рождения! 🎉

❤153custom 524902267940664120341😁11custom 52763648105801518604

14 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC≈1,950 views183 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Представим ситуацию: 🔥Дневник Фаната ♥️Moskvich Band

🔥159❤17👍4custom 52763648105801518602😁1

13 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,100 views135 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @fratria2005Video

К ПОБЕДЕ МЫ ИДЕМ С ТОБОЮ ВМЕСТЕ! Ультрас-актив «Фратрии» перед субботним дерби с цска провел встречу с игроками ЖФК «Спартак» Линой Якуповой, Елизаветой Щербаковой, Габриэлой Гживиньской и Анастасией Колокольчиковой, которые приняли участие в подготовке перфомансов на завтрашний матч!

👍67🔥35custom 524902267940664120322custom 52763648105801518606❤5

Showing the 12 most recent of 233 posts we hold for @moskvichband. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Фратрия
@fratria2005 · 20,182
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 September 2026
СУНДУК
@sunduk91 · 30,108
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 15 September 2026
Ultras Action
@ultras_action · 31,867
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026
ДЕЛИЈЕ СЕВЕР
@Doksezemlja_okosuncakrece · 23,995
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
ХК «Спартак» Москва
@hc_spartak · 60,935
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 22 August 2026
OFNEWS / Околоспортивные Новости
@ofnews · 85,967
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
ФК Спартак | Spartak
@fc_spartakm · 21,695
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
ЖФК «Спартак»
@wfcsm · 26,469
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
Спартак Москва | Spartak Moscow
@tg_spartak · 29,013
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
ФК «Спартак-Москва»
@fcsmtg · 269,145
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Фабрика Спартака
@fabrikaspartaka · 33,682
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
У Кузьмича|"Спартак"
@ykuzmicha · 28,485
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
СПАРТАК ИНФОРМ
@spartakinfo · 20,205
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
𝐆𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐩𝐚𝐎𝐅 𝕳 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥
@Gruppa_OF · 182,904
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026
🔴⚪️КБ ТЕЛЕГА | Никитин
@spartakoz · 55,360
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
ULTRAS TIFO
@ultrastifo · 29,829
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Дай ударитЬ
@daiudarit · 44,655
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 27 August 2026
СРА4ТВ | SRA4TV
@sra4tvofficial · 21,362
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 25 September 2026
РПЛ | Российская Премьер-Лига
@rpl_news · 54,592
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
Фабрика Футбола
@mborzykin · 115,841
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
25/17
@official2517 · 25,473
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MOSKVICH BAND” (@moskvichband), 15,249 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moskvichband.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.