Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ХРОНИКИ «СПАРТАКА»

Channel

ХРОНИКИ «СПАРТАКА»

@hronici_spartaka

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

10,339subscribers

-387 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001955766133
TypeChannel
Username@hronici_spartaka
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hronici_spartaka

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,33910,72610,532.57 August 2026 — 10,726 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,718 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,692 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,680 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,571 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,519 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,513 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,498 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,478 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,473 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,462 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,448 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,436 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,431 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,420 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,411 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,397 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,399 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,398 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,394 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,391 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,380 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,370 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,362 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,348 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,389 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,405 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,394 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,378 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,376 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,363 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,339 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -387. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,281–10,784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:5510,339-24
15 Sept 2026, 19:3610,363-13
14 Sept 2026, 06:1510,376-2
12 Sept 2026, 16:0110,378-16
10 Sept 2026, 16:0010,394-11
7 Sept 2026, 13:1810,405+16
4 Sept 2026, 18:4110,389+41
3 Sept 2026, 00:3310,348-14
1 Sept 2026, 23:4610,362-8
1 Sept 2026, 01:0610,370-10
31 Aug 2026, 02:2210,380-11
29 Aug 2026, 22:4610,391-3
28 Aug 2026, 21:2610,394-4
28 Aug 2026, 00:4510,398-1
27 Aug 2026, 00:5710,399+2
26 Aug 2026, 02:3810,397-14
24 Aug 2026, 23:2410,411-9
23 Aug 2026, 12:4710,420-11
21 Aug 2026, 21:0710,431-5
20 Aug 2026, 13:3610,436first reading

Engagement

113 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 10,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,190
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 113 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held113 (4 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total51,057
Reactions total1,858
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 35s
Average length
3m 18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,956 reactions across 113 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,00035.8%
👎1,66711.9%
custom 52807783275634772141,1308.10%
🤬1,1057.92%
🔥1,0597.59%
custom 52557082598593400796804.87%
👍6354.55%
😐4793.43%
😢4273.06%
💯4072.92%
custom 52605725937898988253332.39%
custom 52558498348663202463272.34%
🏆3022.16%
😭1701.22%
🤔1310.939%
custom 5256135149543794456440.315%
😨300.215%
80.057%
custom 525598003679990228670.05%
🙏70.05%
2 further kinds80.057%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,956 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 113 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hronici_spartaka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 113 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC827 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️ 🤩 Хуан Карседо — о победе над «Зенитом»: Надо оставаться на земле, не улетать — Подтверждает ли победа над «Зенитом» то, что «Спартак» — претендент на чемпионство? — Это блестящая, прекрасная победа. Мы очень рады, что смогли осчастливить наших болельщиков. Но это всего лишь одна игра, мы должны сконцентрироваться на каждом следующем матче. Впереди еще очень много туров, поэтому нужно оставаться ногами на

👍19custom 528077832756347721462

28 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC≈2,340 views77 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚔️ Карседо: конкуренция с Даку ещё больше мотивирует Угальде – Угальде проводит потрясающий сезон, у него отличная голевая серия. С чем вы это связываете? – Потому что он отличный, трудолюбивый игрок. Думаю, что конкуренция с Даку мотивирует его ещё больше. Мы очень довольны его результатами, самое главное, чтобы он продолжал усердно работать и делал то же самое. ❤️Хроники Спартака • Наши каналы

71👍4😐1custom 52807783275634772141

28 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈2,580 views75 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚔️ Селюк: Ахметзянов в «Спартаке» боролся бы за чемпионство ⚔️ Футбольный агент Дмитрий Селюк оценил работу главного тренера «Оренбурга» Ильдара Ахметзянова и заявил, что он способен бороться за высокие места в топ-клубе. — Мне нравится тренер «Оренбурга», они стараются играть в футбол. Если бы Ахметзянов был в «Спартаке» с сильным составом, то боролся бы за чемпионство. Ахметзянов, в отличие от Талалаева, мо

😐61👎63😭3😨2

28 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈2,500 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @xdotskfoPhoto

⚽️ GoalChain— футбольная игра нового поколения прямо в Telegram. Здесь ты сам определяешь, каким будет твой клуб. ✦ Выбирай футболистов и собирай состав ✦ Развивай игроков и раскрывай их потенциал ✦ Ищи новых талантов через скаутинг ✦ Играй быстрые PvP-матчи ✦ Поднимай рейтинг своей команды ✦ Получай уникальных NFT-футболистов в процессе игры Твоя команда. Твои решения. Твоя история.

😐3

28 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈2,710 views39 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚔️ Лапочкин предположил, что зимой из списка судей РПЛ могут пропасть некоторые арбитры, работающие более 10 лет ⚔️ В окончательный список Альфа-Банк РПЛ вошли 26 главных арбитров: Иван Абросимов, Ян Бобровский, Евгений Буланов, Матвей Заика, Сергей Иванов, Василий Казарцев, Игорь Капленков, Сергей Карасев, Данил Каширин, Данил Набока, Михаил Плиско, Евгений Кукуляк, Павел Кукуян, Кирилл Левников, Станислав Ма

38😐1

27 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈3,080 views184 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️ Бразильский «Васко да Гама» сделал «Спартаку» предложение по трансферу Пабло Солари. Общая сумма сделки оценивается примерно в €9 млн: €8 млн — это основная плата с рассрочкой платежей, ещё €1 млн — бонусы, которые зависят от выполнения определённых показателей. Сейчас клуб из Рио-де-Жанейро ждёт решения московской стороны по своему оферту. ❤️Хроники Спартака • Наши каналы

👎166🤬95👍3😐1

27 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈3,140 views102 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️⚔️ Артем Чистяков - главный арбитр матча Спартак — Оренбург. На VAR — Кирилл Левников. ❤️Хроники Спартака • Наши каналы

🤬808custom 52557082598593400796👍3custom 52605725937898988253🏆1😐1

27 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈3,310 views192 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚡ Пресс-служба РПЛ презентовала обновленный логотип в честь юбилейного 25-го сезона. ❤️Хроники Спартака • Наши каналы

🤬136👎44😢5👍2🔥2😨21

26 Aug 2026, 20:58 UTC≈3,510 views83 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⚔️ Пономарёв: Больше всего понравился «Спартак». Ну и цска выправляется. Это сейчас две самые перспективные команды - Прошло 5 туров чемпионата и можно подводить первые итоги старта сезона. Какая команда понравилась больше всего? - Больше всего понравился «Спартак». Ну и цска выправляется. Это сейчас две самые перспективные команды. «Балтика» пока ковыряется. «Локомотив» вообще улетел вниз. Даже «Краснодар» с

custom 528077832756347721461🤔85👍3custom 52605725937898988252🏆1👎1😐1

26 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈3,680 views176 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️ ЦСКА может купить Пруцева ⚔️ ЦСКА рассматривает вариант с переходом Пруцева из «Спартака», но официальных переговоров нет. На усиление полузащиты выделено €35 млн. Статистика хавбека в сезоне: 8 игр, 1 мяч. ❤️Хроники Спартака • Наши каналы

🤬136👎29👍53custom 52561351495437944562😐1

25 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC≈3,890 views221 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️⚔️ ⚔️КДК рассмотрит оскорбительные выражения болельщиков «Спартака» в адрес Соболева — Болельщики «Спартака» массово скандировали ненормативную лексику и оскорбительные выражения в адрес футбольного клуба «Зенит» и футболиста Александра Соболева. ⚔️ Также будет рассмотрена ситуация с задержкой выхода «красно-белых» на 3 минуты перед началом матча. ⚔️ Заседание КДК пройдет в четверг, 27 августа. ❤️Хроники

👎168🤬38custom 525570825985934007975🔥2🤔1

25 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈3,630 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Свершилось, в Telegram добавили лицензионное казино без верификации и лимитов Пробуйте: @JetTon

👎413🤬2🤔1😐1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @hronici_spartaka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hronici_spartaka edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ХРОНИКИ «СПАРТАКА»” (@hronici_spartaka), 10,339 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hronici_spartaka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.