Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Микеле

Channel

Микеле

@MichFut

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,175subscribers

+845 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001579026817
TypeChannel
Username@MichFut
Created3 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MichFut

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3307,2056,767.56 August 2026 — 6,330 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,330 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,333 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,402 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,452 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,461 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,456 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,425 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,407 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,432 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,424 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,593 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,590 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,629 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,653 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,642 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,668 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,843 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,894 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,099 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,120 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,182 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,205 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,192 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,184 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,175 subscribers7,1756 August 202610 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net +845. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,199–7,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 17:577,175-9
7 Nov 2026, 00:257,184-8
4 Nov 2026, 08:597,192-13
1 Nov 2026, 11:147,205+23
29 Oct 2026, 11:407,182+62
26 Oct 2026, 08:397,120+21
23 Oct 2026, 02:497,099+205
19 Oct 2026, 17:566,894+51
16 Oct 2026, 12:056,843+175
13 Oct 2026, 07:476,668+26
6 Oct 2026, 18:586,642-11
29 Sept 2026, 09:416,653+24
18 Sept 2026, 23:016,629+39
14 Sept 2026, 04:386,590-3
10 Sept 2026, 02:216,593+169
5 Sept 2026, 03:206,424-8
1 Sept 2026, 09:096,432+25
29 Aug 2026, 03:386,407-18
26 Aug 2026, 08:266,425-31
23 Aug 2026, 03:476,456first reading

Engagement

109 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 7,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,410
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 109 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held109 (2 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total156,710
Reactions total3,110
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 26s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,983 reactions across 105 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,52330.6%
🤣98419.7%
😁59912.0%
🤡3777.57%
🔥3456.92%
👍2044.09%
🍓1282.57%
🤮1052.11%
💯941.89%
custom 5239962733658512856761.53%
🙉721.44%
💩671.34%
⚡561.12%
👎531.06%
🙏470.943%
😱350.702%
🌭210.421%
🏆180.361%
☃140.281%
😍130.261%
28 further kinds1523.05%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 109 of the 109 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 109 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 109 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MichFut. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 109 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 38 of 65 posts held from the last 30 days (58.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,740 views29 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Либо Царь уже готов к бою с Мусаевым, либо хочет возглавить Торпедо Подписывайся на Микеле

❤11🤣10🍓2🔥2☃1🤡1🤷‍♂1😭1

10 Nov 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,150 views18 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Каррик там приехал на базу в форме клуба, хотя его вроде должны сегодня уволить Интересно, как там Галактионов Подписывайся на Микеле

❤12😁2😭2🤣1🙉1

9 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,580 views44 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

🐷 Умяров - о вратарских навыках: «Прыгать за мячами я бы мог» По мотивам удаления Максименко: Наверное, прыгать за мячами я бы мог. Но насколько это получалось бы, тяжело представить (смеется), — полузащитник «Спартака» Наиль Умяров Подписывайся на Микеле

❤15😁11🤣6🤮3💩2🔥2🌭1👎1

8 Nov 2026, 18:28 UTC≈2,110 views57 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

АХХАХАХАХАХААХ ЗАБУДЬТЕ, ЧТО Я СКАЗАЛ Так не бывает Вратарь ошибся: не дотянулся на выходе и головой забивает Доргу Подписывайся на Микеле

😁38💯8🤣3🤡2❤1🍌1🔥1🕊1

8 Nov 2026, 18:25 UTC≈2,130 views35 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Гол, который уже ничего не решит Подписывайся на Микеле

😁22🤣7❤4💅1🙉1

8 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,090 views25 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Я не понимаю, что происходит с этой командой… Подписывайся на Микеле

🤣18❤4🍓2❤‍🔥1

8 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,960 views26 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Оказывается, поможет… Подписывайся на Микеле

🤣17❤5🍓3💯1

8 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC≈1,850 views23 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Этим бедолагам ничего не поможет ПРЕДПОСЛЕДНЕЕ МЕСТО В АПЛ феерия Подписывайся на Микеле

😁16❤4🍓1🔥1🤣1

8 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,070 views72 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

🐷 «Красная Максименко — катастрофа! Это ни разу не красная! Мяч идет по траектории от ворот, Бабич — последний защитник. Невозможно! Провальное решение арбитра», — спортдир Спартака Кахигао Подписывайся на Микеле

🤡48🙉10💯5⚡3🥰2❤1🌭1🍓1

8 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,930 views41 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🐷 Кто круче, Бориско или Максименко, который еще и удалился в этом моменте? Подписывайся на Микеле

🤣33😁4🙉2❤1🌭1

7 Nov 2026, 17:59 UTC≈2,060 views71 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

🚬 Вы в темном переулке и перед вами настолько злой Кордоба Ваши действия Подписывайся на Микеле

🤣31🤮18🤡6🙉4☃2🍌2🍓2😁2

7 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC≈2,080 views68 reactionsread 10 November 2026

🚬❤️ Как по мне, плечо у Кордобы, все верно засчитали Посмотрел еще, как Лукин остановился перед шедевральным пасом Жоао Виктора Невозможно же так играть Подписывайся на Микеле

🤡29😁12👍9❤5🤣4🤮4🌚1🌭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 109 posts we hold for @MichFut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 57 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Зимин
@footballDiZzz · 25,218
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
МЕЛБЕТ
@melbet_official_russia · 56,428
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
о футболе на Руси | Алланазаров
@registaJournalista · 19,638
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 30 September 2026
Журнал Футбол
@sovsportru · 18,915
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
#вЗените
@vzenite12 · 22,605
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
ФК «Факел» Воронеж
@pfcfakel · 39,840
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Спорт-Экспресс | Sport-Express
@sportexpress · 101,888
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
ФК Зенит | Zenit fans
@zenitfans · 20,870
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
Рашен Football
@rashen_football · 20,176
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
Советский спорт
@sovsport · 42,708
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Панк инсайд
@punkinside · 39,479
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 31 August 2026
Metaratings
@Metaratings · 28,103
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Кафешка
@zenit_cafe · 25,612
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
СПАРТАК ИНФОРМ
@spartakinfo · 20,233
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 September 2026
ЭкСпорт Клипина
@xsport24 · 38,161
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
РБ Спорт
@rbsportrb · 48,101
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 25 August 2026
DENZELLOFFICIAL
@denzellofficial · 38,087
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Игорь Акинфеев #35
@igor_akinfeev35 · 54,356
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
11 на 11
@ftbl11 · 18,631
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Микеле” (@MichFut), 7,175 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MichFut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.