Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Народная Команда

@mediakomanda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,080subscribers

+333 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001681124311
TypeChannel
Username@mediakomanda
Created12 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mediakomanda

Growth

11,74712,08211,914.56 August 2026 — 11,747 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,747 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,974 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,013 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,029 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,063 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,065 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,082 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,080 subscribers12,0806 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +333. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,697–12,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:5712,080-2
12 Aug 2026, 06:0212,082+17
11 Aug 2026, 07:4112,065+2
10 Aug 2026, 08:1412,063+34
9 Aug 2026, 05:2112,029+16
8 Aug 2026, 05:3312,013+39
7 Aug 2026, 08:0711,974+227
6 Aug 2026, 08:3011,747no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:2311,747first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.3%
avg views ÷ 12,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,850
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held34 (30 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total62,809
Reactions total1,362
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 03:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 13s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,331 reactions across 33 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50037.6%
🔥43032.3%
👍17313.0%
👏785.86%
😁755.63%
🏆403.01%
😭191.43%
🆒50.376%
💯30.225%
🤔30.225%
👎20.15%
🤪20.15%
🤩10.075%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,362reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC852 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔝 Дмитрий Мишин и Дмитрий Ананьев — новые игроки «Народной»! Диме Мишину — всего 23 года, но за 8 сезонов в лиге защитник накопил 44 матча под эгидой турнира, выступая за «10», Fight Nights и «Банку» 👏 Дима Ананьев еще моложе, ему 21 год — прошедший сезон МФЛ-7 стал для него ознакомительным в медиафутболе. Атакующий полузащитник выступал за «Эгриси». Добро пожаловать!

11👍10🔥6🏆2

11 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈1,030 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

✈️ NARODNAYA AIRLINES!

25🔥16👏9

11 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,170 views48 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔝 Начинаем битву за Кубок огненной вывеской! ⏳ Информация по времени, месту и билетам будет объявлена позже.

🔥308👍6🏆4

10 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,290 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔥 От «Броуков» до 2Drots: подъехал календарь группового этапа Кубка Медиалиги! Пять матчей — пять финалов 💪 Пишите, какой матч ждете больше всего ✍️

🔥25👏105🏆5🆒2

9 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,350 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✅ Новички вливаются, работа ведется! До начала сезона около трех недель, все под контролем! ✊ Если хотите погрузиться в атмосферу вчерашнего матча, смело открывайте альбом 📸

22🔥8👏3

9 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈1,700 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Браво, ребята! Наши юные таланты из «Народной Джуниор» провели два матча с молодыми «Броуками», в которых одержали победы — 7:3, 6:3. Дальше — больше! 🙌

25👍9🔥6🏆4💯1🆒1

8 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,290 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня уступаем. Второй мяч пропустили на контратаке под финальный свисток. Ответим «Матч ТВ» уже в Кубке Лиги. С наилучшими пожеланиями, дружелюбный сосед «Народная» 😉

25😁12😭7🔥3👍2👎1

8 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈1,170 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Момент за моментом — даже в меньшинстве! Сначала Солома выходит один на один, потом Корж пробивает издали. Прибережем голы на сезон!

8🔥5👍3

8 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈1,030 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

😳 И снова чуть-чуть не хватает для гола — на этот раз Соломе! Попал бы по мячу после прострела — сравняли бы!

🔥103👏2

8 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC992 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Сразу два несчастья: Циба получает красную карточку за фол последней надежды, а соперник забивает со штрафного. 0:1.

😭12

8 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC988 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

И снова Руда создает момент! Ну, очень рядом гол 🤏 Во втором тайме продолжаем играть активно и создавать опасность.

🔥104👍2

8 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC945 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

👏 Выходим на второй тайм с небольшими изменениями— Руда сразу создает активность! Сначала хлестко бьет со штрафного, а потом четко навешивает — вратарь соперника все еще рушит наши планы.

9🔥4👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @mediakomanda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,322 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ФК «Спартак-Москва»
@fcsmtg · 270,510
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Народная Команда” (@mediakomanda), 12,080 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediakomanda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.