Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -131. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,395–6,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 09:39
6,415
-16
11 Sept 2026, 07:40
6,431
+15
6 Sept 2026, 06:17
6,416
-5
1 Sept 2026, 17:33
6,421
-10
29 Aug 2026, 20:16
6,431
-16
26 Aug 2026, 22:07
6,447
-16
23 Aug 2026, 20:58
6,463
-18
20 Aug 2026, 10:53
6,481
-19
17 Aug 2026, 21:15
6,500
-14
14 Aug 2026, 20:54
6,514
-14
11 Aug 2026, 04:02
6,528
-13
8 Aug 2026, 06:57
6,541
-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:31
6,546
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
34s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
800 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
416
52.0%
😍
84
10.5%
👍
69
8.63%
🔥
48
6.00%
🤣
43
5.38%
😁
38
4.75%
❤🔥
31
3.88%
😱
31
3.88%
🤩
27
3.38%
💯
7
0.875%
🙏
3
0.375%
✍
1
0.125%
💘
1
0.125%
😭
1
0.125%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 800 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
заюзала этот крем прям до конца, уже выскребла остатки, чтобы показать вам текстуру🤗
а она ГЕНИАЛЬНАЯ, потому что впитывается просто в ноль. для сухого тела пока что лучшая банка, которую я пробовала
хорошо увлажнить могут многие, но оставить кожу напитанной, и при этом НЕ ЖИРНОЙ – единицы
моя любимая схема:
гель для душа с кислотами ➡️мочалка кесе ➡️этот крем
просто бархат получается🤌🏼
очень сильно лайкаю это липкомбо от смешариков🙏🙏🙏
с тинтом главное не перебарщивать, чтобы губы не были слишком фиолетовыми (как на видосе выше🙂)
больше всего кайф именно от карандаша, такой классный оттенок, и стойкость бешеная. прям берите, если любите такой эффект!
сегодня я решила себе сделать ВЫХОДНОЙ и перестать 24/7 вынашивать идеи тиктоков и строить стратегии у себя в голове🫠🫠
вроде почти получилось, в итоге:
* 5 просмотренных выпусков быстрых свиданий
* начала учить пайтон
* трехчасовой мейк чисто для удовольствия, а не для видео
* провальная укладка на носки
* АХУЕННАЯ укладка на рандомную трубку из коробки с игрушками моей племяшки😂
на короткие волосы носки – вообще н…
я недавно сделала кислотную смывку, чтобы четко видеть, сколько своей длины у меня отрастает😍
(ну и чтобы концы выглядели ”здоровее”, потому что в темном цвете сильнее видны все сечения от обесцвечивания😭)
и имеем мы ~18-20 см за год, и это ещё с депрессией и дефицитами железа и b12!!
а это значит, что через год у меня уже точно будет полностью своя длина, и можно опять в блонд😂
ШУЧУ
я чуть не зарыдала когда нанесла их на разные части лица😭😭😭
СУКАААААААА ЭТО ОДИН В ОДИН!!!!
МНЕ ЕГО ПРОСТО КИНУЛИ К ПОКУПКЕ В РИВ ГОШЕ. А ТУТ ВОТ ЭТО.
5000₽ против 200₽. на лице просто невозможно отличить. у меня нет слов.
только Гурмандиз без спирта)))))
и Шисейдо чуть-чуть более пигментированный
на фото shiseido оттенок 150, Гурмандиз оттенок 1, абсолютно идентичны🥲🥲🥲
только сильно не завидуйте😕🥺
я поняла, что у меня слишком дохрена карандашей, поэтому решила заказать такой вот художественный пенальчик
это самый приличный дизайн, который смогла найти, хотела бы конечно однотонный🐥
но мне к такому надо прям привыкать, потому что привычка класть всё на место отсутствует… но мы справимся
полное наполнение кину в коммы👇🏼
такая рассылочная эстетика😍
у меня, кстати, наконец закончилась жажда каждый месяц скупать половину зя!!
потому что ВСЁ УЖЕ У МЕНЯ ДОМА.
смотрим, что у нас тут интересного:
🌼у Feel Moment солнечная коллекция, и там я уже оценила хайлайтер для тела, прям крутой! и скоро попробую автозагар, моя тема
🌼дорогие Beautydrugs стабильно снабжают меня любимыми гелем и тушью для бровей😅 + другие продукты скоро заценим
🌼у …
кто уже пробовал делать веснушки методом моей младшей сестры??
у меня тоже очень часто НЕ получается😂
потому что тут важна прям совокупность факторов, но два самых важных:
1️⃣лицо должно быть очень хорошо припудрено
2️⃣кисточка должна быть очень мокрая (можно и водой, но я лично ещё не пробовала)
у кого получалось, жду фотки в комментах!!!
❤26🔥8❤🔥3😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @anchutacr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
dears, вопрос! вы используете spf в стиках или в кремах? какой формат больше нравится?☀️
кремы/флюиды69%
стики6%
юзаю и то, и то10%
вообще не мажусь spf16%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
фрисби @skidka_wow · 34,455 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анчута” (@anchutacr), 6,415 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anchutacr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.