Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for bhab | привычка к красоте 🤍

Channel

bhab | привычка к красоте 🤍

@bhab_russia

Not marked by Telegram, checked 14 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,136subscribers

+872 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002213032522
TypeChannel
Username@bhab_russia
DescriptionКанал Бренда корейской косметики bhab 📝 Консультант @bhabconsultation Официальный сайт 🤍 bhabrussia.ru Мы в Золотом Яблоке 🍏 goldapple.ru/brands/bhab OZON ➡️ ozon.ru/t/8M27yK5
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bhab_russia

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2357,1366,685.56 August 2026 — 6,264 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,265 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,293 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,276 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,258 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,255 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,365 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,297 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,235 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,266 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,683 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,930 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,792 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,675 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,298 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,669 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,781 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,784 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,817 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,965 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,791 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,713 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,751 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,770 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,136 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +872. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,100–7,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 04:597,136+366
2 Nov 2026, 14:086,770+19
30 Oct 2026, 22:286,751+38
28 Oct 2026, 04:256,713-78
25 Oct 2026, 00:066,791-174
21 Oct 2026, 18:506,965+148
18 Oct 2026, 04:006,817+33
14 Oct 2026, 21:156,784+3
11 Oct 2026, 23:586,781+112
4 Oct 2026, 23:556,669+371
25 Sept 2026, 15:176,298-377
15 Sept 2026, 00:406,675-117
11 Sept 2026, 17:406,792-138
7 Sept 2026, 05:206,930+247
2 Sept 2026, 10:556,683+417
30 Aug 2026, 19:256,266+31
27 Aug 2026, 23:476,235-62
24 Aug 2026, 20:336,297-68
21 Aug 2026, 04:146,365+110
18 Aug 2026, 10:366,255first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 7,136 subscribers
Avg views / post
827
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held42 (23 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total19,859
Reactions total1,520
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 01:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
613
Videos
301
Links
416

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 28s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,149 reactions across 40 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,82558.0%
🥰34010.8%
😍3129.91%
❤‍🔥2548.07%
🔥1635.18%
👍802.54%
⚡471.49%
💘471.49%
👀190.603%
🤔190.603%
🦄160.508%
😈100.318%
🤓100.318%
💅60.191%
🆒10.032%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 42 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bhab_russia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC269 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

PADEL & PILATES 14 ноября | Москва 🤍 У нас вновь прекрасная коллаборация с Swan Moscow. Каждой участнице подарят спортивную форму в белом цвете и косметичку с уходовой косметикой от @bhab_russia_official Всего 10 мест! Вас ждет: 🦢Тренировка по пилатесу под DJ-сет 🦢Изысканный фуршет & профессиональная фото-съемка на корте 🦢 мастер-класс от тренера по падел & мини-турнир среди участниц! Больше информации здесь Ме…

❤15👍8🥰3💘2

5 Nov 2026, 16:43 UTC541 views55 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤26😍14❤‍🔥10🦄5

4 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC719 views65 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Голосуйте

  1. Больше развлекательного контента и интерактивов7%
  2. Разборы составов и активных компонентов45%
  3. Бьюти-лайфхаки и секреты38%
  4. Всё понемногу, люблю разнообразие 🤍44%
  5. Свой вариант в комментариях 🫶🏽0%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤36❤‍🔥13🥰11🦄4🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC670 views64 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Мини-опрос 💌 Какие посты чаще хочется видеть в нашем канале? Хотим создавать больше контента, который вам интересен 👀

❤37🥰12🔥9❤‍🔥5😍1

3 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC742 views90 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Красота начинается с привычек 🤍 Мы верим, что здоровое сияние, чистая и гладкая кожа - результат маленьких ежедневных привычек и бьюти-ритуалов, которые со временем становятся частью нашей жизни. Наша цель – сделать заботу о себе проще, комфортнее и приятнее. Именно поэтому мы создаём многофункциональные средства, которые помогают сократить время ухода, не жертвуя его эффективностью. В основе каждого продукта – г…

❤84😍6

2 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC724 views106 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Знакомьтесь, это Таня – человек, который с любовью собирает и отправляет ваши заказы. Каждый вручную и с вниманием к деталям 🤍 Сегодня заглядываем за кулисы и вместе с Таней собираем заказ для нашей покупательницы. Сделать заказ 🌿

❤62🥰20❤‍🔥18😍6

31 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC887 views108 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Голосуйте, признавайтесь, не стесняйтесь. Обещаем: никаких страшных последствий для вашей кожи. С Хэллоуином! 👻

❤62🔥26❤‍🔥14🦄6

31 Oct 2026, 14:42 UTC768 views47 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Ваше самое страшное признание 🤫

  1. Иногда забываю про уход17%
  2. Могу выдавить то, что нельзя53%
  3. Покупаю косметику импульсивно24%
  4. Использую средства с истёкшим сроком33%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤44🔥3

31 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTC697 views43 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Выберите своего бьюти-монстра 👿

  1. Агрессивное очищение17%
  2. Слишком много активов20%
  3. Отсутствие увлажнения32%
  4. Солнце без SPF52%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤32🔥10🥰1

31 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTC642 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Что у вас вызывает бьюти-панику?

  1. Воспаления перед важным событием54%
  2. Жирный блеск через час после ухода19%
  3. Сухость кожи после умывания24%
  4. Внезапное шелушение тонального31%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤34

31 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC584 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

Страшный сон вашей косметички

  1. Средство закончилось в самый не подходящий момент24%
  2. Купила уход, а он не подошёл58%
  3. Увидеть состав и ничего не понять9%
  4. Новая сыворотка вызвала реакцию37%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤33🔥1

31 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTC600 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

что страшнее всего?

  1. Проснуться с новым воспалением38%
  2. Переборщить с кислотами22%
  3. Забыть смыть макияж перед сном26%
  4. Пересушить кожу до шелушений44%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤34

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @bhab_russia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTCAnonymous Poll136 voters

Голосуйте

  1. Больше развлекательного контента и интерактивов7%
  2. Разборы составов и активных компонентов45%
  3. Бьюти-лайфхаки и секреты38%
  4. Всё понемногу, люблю разнообразие 🤍44%
  5. Свой вариант в комментариях 🫶🏽0%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Oct 2026, 14:42 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

Ваше самое страшное признание 🤫

  1. Иногда забываю про уход17%
  2. Могу выдавить то, что нельзя53%
  3. Покупаю косметику импульсивно24%
  4. Использую средства с истёкшим сроком33%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTCAnonymous Poll130 voters

Выберите своего бьюти-монстра 👿

  1. Агрессивное очищение17%
  2. Слишком много активов20%
  3. Отсутствие увлажнения32%
  4. Солнце без SPF52%

The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTCAnonymous Poll127 voters

Что у вас вызывает бьюти-панику?

  1. Воспаления перед важным событием54%
  2. Жирный блеск через час после ухода19%
  3. Сухость кожи после умывания24%
  4. Внезапное шелушение тонального31%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTCAnonymous Poll135 voters

Страшный сон вашей косметички

  1. Средство закончилось в самый не подходящий момент24%
  2. Купила уход, а он не подошёл58%
  3. Увидеть состав и ничего не понять9%
  4. Новая сыворотка вызвала реакцию37%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Oct 2026, 14:38 UTCAnonymous Poll131 voters

что страшнее всего?

  1. Проснуться с новым воспалением38%
  2. Переборщить с кислотами22%
  3. Забыть смыть макияж перед сном26%
  4. Пересушить кожу до шелушений44%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кремлёвская больница (ЦКБ УДП РФ)
@kremlinmedicine · 25,645
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 September 2026
Таёжная травница Татьяна Завражина 🌿
@tatyanazdorovie · 20,955
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bhab | привычка к красоте 🤍” (@bhab_russia), 7,136 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bhab_russia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.