6 measurements spanning 5 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,979–61,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:27
61,003
-44
11 Aug 2026, 15:16
61,047
-49
10 Aug 2026, 11:48
61,096
+17
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
61,079
+54
8 Aug 2026, 11:03
61,025
+31
7 Aug 2026, 12:45
60,994
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.5%
avg views ÷ 61,003 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,400
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
15 (28 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
260,640
Reactions total
6,511
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,810
Videos
≈445
Links
≈270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,511 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,117
63.2%
❤🔥
496
7.62%
💘
431
6.62%
🍓
422
6.48%
💋
307
4.72%
🔥
257
3.95%
😍
174
2.67%
💔
133
2.04%
🙏
90
1.38%
💅
59
0.906%
👍
11
0.169%
💯
10
0.154%
🌭
3
0.046%
👏
1
0.015%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,511reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @angchloeme. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
нашла, чем можно заменить новый хайлайтер от Dior 💖
после того как увидела его в ленте, сразу пошла искать что-то похожее
пока больше всего зацепили два средства:
SHU Glow Trap – влажное сияние без крупных блесток. у него гелевая текстура, он красиво сливается с кожей и дает эффект, будто это вообще не хайлайтер, а естественное свечение. по ощущениям это самый близкий вариант к диор, хотя финиш может быть чуть боле…
наш новый член семьи!
мы назвали его Рокки 👎🏻
сейчас все чаще слышу, что собака в доме – маркер богатства. чтож, как владелец двух собак, я полностью согласна:
купить каждого за ~100тр, ежемесячно кормить их суперпуперпремиум кормом с консервами, параллельно давать хорошее мясо и фрукты, периодически заменять испорченные и погрызенные вещи, в идеале жить не в квартире, а в доме. теперь еще и купить флагманский роб…
мою любовь к фильмам про космос сформировал мультик "незнайка на Луне", очень его любила в детстве🥹
и, вот мне 24, а я также люблю все, что связано с луной. наверное, мои главные фавориты из этой тематики:«Интерстеллар», «Марсианин» и проект «Конец света» (он же «Аве Мария») его мы смотрели последним :)
ещё пробовала несколько раз посмотреть «Космическую одиссею», фильм считается легендарным и культовым, но меня он…
мне запрещено открывать подборки бьюти-новинок…
сразу все и сразу хочется скупить😭
самое интересное:
мисты Gisou - меня зацепили сами баночки, маркетологи опять поработали на славу…но идея тоже классная: это мисты с гиалуроновой кислотой и пептидами. очень интересно, получится ли от них не только приятный запах, но и красивый блеск волос
мисты Sol de Janeiro - один пахнет персиком, кокосовым молоком и сливками, вто…
не описать всю мою любовь к рынкам 💔
огурцы и помидоры - это святое. чем меньше и колючее огурцы, тем они слаще, проверено годами. а помидоры беру только огромные, немного страшные на вид, но именно такие самые вкусные!!! (правда, сейчас мы чаще ездим к родителям на дачу за ними💅🏻)
еще, обязательно ни один поход на рынок не обходится без арбуза (без него совсем не могу). А ЕЩЕ НЕКТАРИНЫ, взяли 4кг на неделю, так чт…
сберегла для вас секретные места в Адлере, сохраняйте! 💋🎀
первое, Тары-Бары, хуторок по дороге на поляну. место совсем непопулярное, но борщ там просто невероятный!!! и цены приятные:)
второе, район Галицыно, особенно возле Ахштырской пещеры. там есть такие красивые парки, площадочки, просто кататься по этому району уже кайф
третье, орнитологический парк в Адлере. сам парк ОЧЕНЬ КРАСИВЫЙ, кипарисы, лебеди, утки и…
белковый ужин за 15 минут без творога и сухой грудки💔
ньокки – самый недооцененный гарнир!!! у него отличное кбжу, это безумно вкусно и варятся они всего 2 минуты :)
чаще всего я делаю по этому рецепту:
1 куриное филе (бедро или грудка без разницы) обжариваю на сковороде, закидываю туда же одну луковицу. после того, как курица посветлела – добавляю ложку томатной пасты и следом сливки 20%, все делаю на глаз и ориен…
жизнь меня ничему не учит….
никогда не лезть руками к пасти собак когда они грызутся✍🏻
вчера решили поехать погулять с детьми, и пока ехали, они сзади что-то не поделили и начали ругаться и грызться, у них такое бывает
ну и я как настоящая мать решила влезть в их разборки и попасться разнять… одной рукой… прямо возле их морд…
ну и всё. больновато, но даже погулять смогли нормально, подумаешь рана. уже утром когда…
на днях мы собирали и красили мой новый шкаф, который я заказала специально для духов и косметики… и в процессе у меня разбила сразу четыре флакона 😭
официально самая дорогая трагедия месяца.
первой погибла Delina от Parfums de Marly. полный флакон. это аромат, с которого началась моя любовь к розовым парфюмам. сладкая, очень женственная, нежная роза с сочным личи. многие мне говорили, что этот аромат пахнет мной, …
❤175💘35😍22💔7❤🔥1👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @angchloeme. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
rutkismary @rutkismary · 331,028 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 August 2026
DaSHuk @ShulginaDa · 152,215 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ангел хлоя” (@angchloeme), 61,003 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/angchloeme.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.