💰 BTC 63850$
❤4🐳3👏3🥴2

Channel
@shitcoink
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
305,367subscribers
-4,401 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001213600238 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shitcoink |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shitcoink |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 305,367 | +146 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 305,221 | -711 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 305,932 | -694 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 306,626 | -857 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 307,483 | -815 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:41 | 308,298 | -951 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 309,249 | -519 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 309,768 | first reading |
63 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 63 (1 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 161,746 |
| Reactions total | 1,325 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,154 reactions across 54 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 440 | 38.1% | |
| 👏 | 272 | 23.6% | |
| 🥴 | 233 | 20.2% | |
| 🐳 | 155 | 13.4% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 1.99% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 1.30% | |
| 🎃 | 6 | 0.52% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 0.433% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.433% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,325reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰 BTC 63850$
❤4🐳3👏3🥴2
🚨🇺🇸سی پی آی CPI مطابق انتظار منتشر شد! 📊 تورم سالانه از ۳.۵٪ 👈 ۳.۴٪ کاهش یافت و دقیقاً مطابق پیشبینی بود. 📈کور سی پی آی Core CPI هم مطابق انتظار به ۲.۵٪ رسید. ⚡️ حالا همه نگاهها به واکنش #بیت_کوین و بازارهای مالی دوخته شده👀🔥
👏11❤5🐳3
☄️آیا به دنبال استراتژی هستید که به شما کمک کند روزانه 500% درآمد داشته باشید؟ اکنون بپیوندید و همین امروز شروع کنید — https://t.me/+rISrKXIqr3FhNDgy
🥴4🐳3👍3👏2
🇺🇸 دادههای CPI آمریکا امروز ساعت 16:00 منتشر میشود! رقم قبلی: 3.5% پیشبینی: 3.4% ⏺ اگر تورم بیشتر از 3.4% باشد → منفی ⏺ اگر تورم کمتر از 3.4% باشد → مثبت ⏺ اگر تورم برابر با 3.4% باشد → احتمالاً شاهد واکنش ترکیبی بازار خواهیم بود.
❤11👏4🐳3
📊یکی از نشانه های تشکیل کف بیت کوین،بیشتر شدن ضررهای محقق شده نسبت به سیو سودها در بازاره. 📉طبق چارت بالا،هر وقت خط آبی بخواد خط زرد رنگ رو قطع کنه،ما به کف بازار،بسیار نزدیکیم. 🔔 الان هم شرایط بازار،شبیه به همین مورده و فاصله زمانی زیادی تا کف نیستش.
❤11🐳4👏2
دوستان کانال دوممون رو داشته باشید اونجا کلی خبر مهم جدید قرار میگره👇🏼 https://t.me/memecoink7 https://t.me/memecoink7
❤5👏3🐳2
اگه دقت کنید الان هیچ پروژه ای خبر مثبت نمیده بیرون... ولی زمانش برسه همه باهم شروع میکنن 😉👌 تو این موج صعودی باید نهایت استفاده رو ببریم😎👌
❤23🥴8👏4🐳2
۹۹٪ صاحبپروژهها بهترین خبرهاشون رو برای آلتسیزن نگه داشتن… 🔥 قراره خبر خوب پشتِ خبر خوب بیاد؛ همون چیزی که میتونه یه ارز رو وارد یه موج رشد جدی کنه. 🚀 همه منتظرن؛ منتظر یه شکار واقعی بین این همه پروژهای که دارن آماده میشن. 👀 گاهی بازار قبل از پامپ، فقط سکوت میکنه… ولی وقتی خبرها یکییکی آزاد بشن، بازی میتونه کاملاً عوض بشه. ⚡️
❤26🥴8👏5🐳3👍2😍1
بانک مرکزی روسیه و چارچوب جدید قانونی این کشور، معامله #بیت_کوین ، #اتریوم و تتر #USDT را در صرافیهای مجاز و قانونمند تایید کرده است.این قانون از 1 سپتامبر 2026 (10 شهریور) اجرایی میشود و برای سرمایهگذاران خرد سقف خرید سالانه حدود 4,000 دلار (300 هزار روبل) در نظر گرفته است. 🟢مثبت
🐳2❤1👏1
صرافی آمریکایی کوینبیس، مرکز خود را در ابوظبی، امارات متحده عربی جهت توکنسازی داراییهای دنیای واقعی RWA راهاندازی کرده است و تنظیمکننده محلی FSRA مجوز لازم را برای این اقدام صادر نموده است. 🟢 مثبت
🐳7❤4👏2
🟢خرید بیتکوین در صرافیهای بایننس (Binance) و اوکیایکس (OKX) در حال افزایش است. در مقابل، صرافی کوینبیس (Coinbase) هیچ تغییر قابل توجهی را نشان نمیدهد.
🐳4❤2👏2
🇸🇽 اقتصاد #فیلیپین با کمک AI در حال رشد است! 💯صنعت برونسپاری فیلیپین در سال 2026 پیشبینی میشود به 42 میلیارد دلار درآمد برسد و برای 1.9 میلیون نفر اشتغال ایجاد کند؛ در حالی که AI به کارکنان کمک میکند وارد نقشهای تخصصیتر شوند.
👍6❤4🐳3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @shitcoink. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 28,492 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ShitCoin New🐳شت کوین” (@shitcoink), 305,367 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shitcoink.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.