Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 25 days, net -3,231. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,814–80,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 05:56
76,299
-378
5 Sept 2026, 19:58
76,677
-306
3 Sept 2026, 16:21
76,983
-110
2 Sept 2026, 11:57
77,093
-111
1 Sept 2026, 09:15
77,204
-138
31 Aug 2026, 10:25
77,342
-121
30 Aug 2026, 09:29
77,463
-135
29 Aug 2026, 12:18
77,598
-137
28 Aug 2026, 11:34
77,735
-108
27 Aug 2026, 09:07
77,843
-129
26 Aug 2026, 05:47
77,972
-187
25 Aug 2026, 02:34
78,159
-134
23 Aug 2026, 17:39
78,293
-226
22 Aug 2026, 04:34
78,519
-207
20 Aug 2026, 17:23
78,726
-141
19 Aug 2026, 17:36
78,867
-195
18 Aug 2026, 14:25
79,062
-167
17 Aug 2026, 13:34
79,229
-188
16 Aug 2026, 06:37
79,417
-113
15 Aug 2026, 15:00
79,530
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
444
Videos
14
Links
150
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
32
91.4%
🤩
2
5.71%
🔥
1
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣 200,000 دلار جایزه در XT Futures
پاداش ها قابل ضرر و بدون محدودیت لورج و جفت ارز
💵 تا 10.5% APR روی دارایی های فیوچرز خود کسب کن!
🔴واریز کن و تا 300 دلار بونوس + سهم از استخر 200,000 دلاری
🔥 پاداش اول – کش بک تا 40% (تجمیعی):
• واریز بیشتر از 25 دلار ← 10 دلار اعتبار آزمایشی (نگهداری 3 روزه)
• واریز بیشتر از 100 دلار ← 20 دلار اعتبار آزمایشی (نگهداری 7 روزه)
• واریز بیشتر از 300 دلار ← 70 دلار اعتبار آزمایشی (…
نتایج سیگنالای کانال vip رایگان تو این چند روز گذشته✅
👨💻شرایط عضویت رایگان داخل کانال Vip:
ثبت نام با لینک👇
https://www.xtmember.com/fa/activity/mena-0423c?ref=WV2MOK
یا با کد معرف WV2MOK
و واریز حداقل 30 تتر داخل صرافی
❗️بعد از ثبت نام و شارژ حساب، از طریق ربات برای عضویت رایگان درخواست بدید
🤖آیدی ربات: @CryptoVipXt_bot
🪙 نهنگها قبل از آپگرید مهم، در حال جمعآوری SUI هستن!
🕯 دادههای آنچین نشون میده سرمایه های بزرگ در محدوده 0.80 تا 1 دلار بهصورت سنگین وارد SUI شدن.
💵بخش زیادی از خریدها حوالی 0.90 تا 1 دلار ثبت شده؛ یعنی پول هوشمند آروم در حال انباشت بوده.
⚠️ اما چیزی که توجه بازار رو بیشتر جلب کرده، آپگرید هفته آینده شبکه SUI هست:
💥 قابلیت Gasless Transfers فعال میشه؛ یعنی کاربران برای انجام تراکنش دیگه لازم نیست توکن SUI ب…
🔹 🕯 فشار فروش آنلاک شدن توکن ها داره از روی بعضی از بزرگ ترین پروژه های بازار برداشته میشه.
✅ توکن هایی مثل:
• Sui
• Avalanche
• NEAR Protocol
• Injective
• Celestia
• Immutable
• Axie Infinity
تمام دوره آزادسازی توکن رو پشت سر گذاشتن، یعنی بازار کمتر نگران فروش سنگین از سمت VCهاست و حالا تمرکز بیشتر روی رشد واقعی پروژه هاست.
همچنین:
Aptos → نزدیک پایان آنلاک
Jito → نزدیک پایان آنلاک
➕ معمولا پروژههایی که …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BitPlaaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Rastegar Trade | سیگنال رایگان @Rastegar_trade · 123,730 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
Toobit | 🏦 | صرافی توبیت @ToobitFarsi · 137,624 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بیت پلاز | BitPlaaz” (@BitPlaaz), 76,299 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitPlaaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.