Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال ایردراپ تحلیل ربات نات پیکسل|پیشگویی جنگ ایران و اسراییل| داگز | بلوم|پاوز|میجر|سیگما|روکو

Channel

کانال ایردراپ تحلیل ربات نات پیکسل|پیشگویی جنگ ایران و اسراییل| داگز | بلوم|پاوز|میجر|سیگما|روکو

@yescoinnotcointapswap

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29,676subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223190932
TypeChannel
Username@yescoinnotcointapswap
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/yescoinnotcointapswap

Growth

29,65129,69329,67212 August 2026 — 29,693 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,693 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,683 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,672 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,685 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,651 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,676 subscribers29,67612 August 202617 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,645–29,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:5529,676+25
16 Aug 2026, 08:1229,651-34
14 Aug 2026, 21:2629,685+13
13 Aug 2026, 15:5829,672-11
12 Aug 2026, 18:2829,683-10
12 Aug 2026, 06:3029,693no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:1629,693first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.78%
avg views ÷ 29,676 subscribers
Avg views / post
528
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 48 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held49 (8 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total25,884
Reactions total1,834
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 31s
Average length
2m 16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,834 reactions across 48 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,25468.4%
👍46825.5%
🔥311.69%
👎261.42%
👏170.927%
🐳150.818%
🥰120.654%
🥴80.436%
👾10.055%
🗿10.055%
😴10.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC82 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨گزارش جدید: #طلا از اوراق خزانه‌داری #آمریکا عبور کرد و به مهم‌ترین دارایی ذخیره‌ای جهان تبدیل شد. 🔹این تغییر نشان‌دهنده افزایش تقاضای بانک‌های مرکزی برای طلا و کاهش نسبی اتکا به اوراق آمریکا است.

16 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC336 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨🚨آتش بس ۶۰ روزه به پایان رسید

🔥111

16 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC356 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨💥 خبر داغ برای بازار کریپتو! 💰 فدرال رزرو از هفته آینده حدود ۱۶.۹۷ میلیارد دلار نقدینگی به بازار تزریق می‌کند. 🟢 این تزریق قرار است ۳ هفته متوالی ادامه داشته باشد؛ اتفاقی که می‌تواند سوخت لازم برای افزایش ریسک‌پذیری سرمایه‌گذاران و رشد بازارهای مالی، به‌ویژه کریپتو را فراهم کند.

10🥴7

16 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC365 views13 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

📣ویتالیـک بوترین: #اتریوم به‌دنبال افزایش چشمگیر مقیاس‌پذیری است، بدون اینکه غیرمتمرکز بودن و مقاومت در برابر سانسور را قربانی کند.

👍92🥰2

16 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC337 views10 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

📌برنامه اقتصادی این هفته: 🔻دوشنبه → پایان توافق آمریکا و ایران 🔻سه‌شنبه → آمار شروع ساخت‌وساز مسکن و تولید صنعتی 🔻چهارشنبه → انتشار صورت‌جلسه فدرال رزرو (FOMC Minutes) 🔻پنج‌شنبه → آمار اولیه درخواست‌های بیمه بیکاری 🔻جمعه → شاخص مدیران خرید (PMI) بخش تولید و خدمات آمریکا از S&P Global ⚠️ انتظار نوسانات بسیار شدید در بازارهای مالی و #کریپتو را داشته باشید!

👏72🐳1

16 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC312 views12 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🐋 حرکت بیت‌کوین‌های قدیمی! شاخص Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) نشون می‌ده کیف‌پول‌های قدیمی #بیت‌کوین دوباره شروع به حرکت کردن؛ اتفاقی که تو دو بازار نزولی قبلی، نزدیک کف بازار دیده شده بود. سال 2018، کف بازار 119 روز بعد از این اتفاق شکل گرفت. سال 2022، کف بازار 35 روز بعد شکل گرفت. حالا 84 روز از سیگنال فعلی گذشته.

🐳8👏31

15 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC414 views23 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🐋 نهنگ‌های دوج کوین ۴۷۰ میلیون DOGE خریداری کردند؛ بازار در انتظار نشست کاخ سفید ▫️نهنگ‌های دوج کوین (DOGE) در آستانه نشست کاخ سفید درباره ارزهای دیجیتال که قرار است چهارشنبه همین هفته برگزار شود، حدود ۴۷۰ میلیون دوج‌کوین معادل تقریباً ۳۳ میلیون دلار خریداری کرده‌اند. قیمت دوج کوین در حال حاضر در محدوده ۰.۰۷ دلار در نوسان است.

14🥰8👏1

15 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC482 views29 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

مقایسه قیمت ها 2021 و 2026 برگردن قیمت قبل خودش الت سیزن حساب میشه😂🚀

👍22👏6🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC554 views25 reactionsread 17 August 2026

شرکت ورلد لیبرتی فایننشال #WLFI ارزهای دیجیتال خانواده دونالد ترامپ مجوز تبدیل شدن به یک بانک فدرال را دریافت کرد. 🟢مثبت

25

14 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC692 views37 reactionsread 17 August 2026

بانک لئومی Leumi، بزرگ‌ترین بانک اسرائیل، قصد دارد از ابتدای سال 2027 به مشتریان امکان خرید و فروش مستقیم ارزهای دیجیتال را از طریق برنامه بانکی خود فراهم آورد. در ابتدا، #بیت‌_کوین، #اتریوم و سولانا #SOL در دسترس خواهند بود. 🟢مثبت

37

14 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC749 views56 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🤑 توی تاریخ 8 بار گفتن که #بیت‌کوین مرده و کارش تمومه! 2010: 0.10 دلار 2011: 1 دلار 2013: 50 دلار 2015: 200 دلار 2018: 3000 دلار 2022: 15000 دلار 2024: 39000 دلار 2026: 60000 دلار اما هر بار بعد از این‌که به کف رسیده دوباره برگشته و قیمتش از قبل هم بالاتر رفته. ❓ فکر می‌کنی این دفعه توی چه قیمتی به کف می‌رسه؟

26👍16👎13🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @yescoinnotcointapswap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 759,183 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال ایردراپ تحلیل ربات نات پیکسل|پیشگویی جنگ ایران و اسراییل| داگز | بلوم|پاوز|میجر|سیگما|روکو” (@yescoinnotcointapswap), 29,676 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yescoinnotcointapswap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.