Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GEOESTRATEGIA.EU

Channel

GEOESTRATEGIA.EU

@elespiadigital

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,694subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001053691107
TypeChannel
Username@elespiadigital
DescriptionPortal geoestrategia.eu
Created8 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elespiadigital

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “GEOESTRATEGIA.ES — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

7,6887,6997,693.56 August 2026 — 7,698 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,698 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,699 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,695 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,688 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,694 subscribers7,6946 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,686–7,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:037,694+6
12 Aug 2026, 06:037,688-7
9 Aug 2026, 07:527,695-4
6 Aug 2026, 09:407,699+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:067,698no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:067,698first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 7,694 subscribers
Avg views / post
875
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
77
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held77 (4 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total67,376
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,120
Videos
3,540
Links
22,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20m 46s
Average length
1m 53s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC466 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46632/economia/noticias-economicas-la-deuda-de-las-empresas-de-inteligencia-artificial-ia-estadounidenses-ha-alcanzado-los-tres-billones-de-dolares.html

17 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC435 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46638/seguridad/la-formacion-de-un-espia-entre-bastidores-de-la-guerra-de-reclutamiento-de-israel-contra-los-movimientos-de-resistencia.html

17 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC423 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46658/defensa/el-drama-de-ormuz-trump-espera-a-que-iran-ceda-pero-son-los-ee.-uu.-los-que-estan-bajo-presion-con-una-impotencia-creciente.-analisis.html

17 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC412 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46657/ultimas-noticias/zaporhzia-queda-aislada-tras-el-bombardeo-ruso-del-puente-sobre-el-dnieper.-avance-ruso-en-todo-el-frente.-kiev-solo-busca-asesinar-civiles.html

17 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC828 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46655/ultimas-noticias/espana-rodeada-de-traidores-por-fuera-y-por-dentro-la-ue-atribuye-a-ceuta-y-melilla-un-estatus-intermedio-entre-espana-y-marruecos.html

17 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC600 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @albatropsPhoto

⚡️Israel debe llevar a cabo entre 30 y 40 "eliminaciones" en Gaza cada noche, según el ministro de seguridad nacional Ben-Gvir. "No deben vivir. Ni siquiera son personas", afirmó el ministro israelí.

17 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC539 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @wofnonVideo

❗️Increíbles imágenes del paso de un rompehielos de la Federación Rusa🇷🇺. Rusia posee la flota de rompehielos más grande del mundo. China🇨🇳 acaba de pagar el tránsito de las primeras rutas del ártico a Moscú. 📲(https://t.me/wofnon) #Rusia #wofnon

17 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC600 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @EurekapressPhoto

🇺🇸🇮🇷 La excongresista estadounidense Marjorie Taylor Greene afirmó que la Casa Blanca y el Pentágono están considerando la posibilidad de utilizar armas nucleares contra Irán: "No lo asumo, lo sé. Y eso es un absoluto mal", escribió Greene en la red social X, pero no proporcionó ninguna prueba para respaldar su afirmación. Añadió que los líderes estadounidenses serán responsabilizados por la "historia" si se produce

16 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC753 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46624/historia/historia-de-piotr-potemkin-y-la-primera-embajada-rusa-en-la-historia-de-espana.html

16 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC727 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46637/geoestrategia/rutas-de-datos-y-el-nuevo-equilibrio-de-poder.html

16 Aug 2026, 22:52 UTC674 viewsread 18 August 2026

https://geoestrategia.eu/noticia/46636/defensa/guerra-contra-iran-la-flota-de-eeuu-sobrepasada-y-en-situacion-desastrosa.-exigen-explicaciones-al-pentagono.-analisis.html

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @elespiadigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 176,888 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Liu Sivaya
@liusivaya · 130,614
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
El Ojo 👁 Noticias |Guerra en Irán| Guerra entre Rusia y Ucrania | China | EE.UU. | Putin | Trump | Venezuela
@elOJOen · 90,435
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GEOESTRATEGIA.EU” (@elespiadigital), 7,694 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elespiadigital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.