14 measurements spanning 12 days, net -209. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,599–24,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 13:36
24,630
-14
17 Aug 2026, 16:58
24,644
-37
16 Aug 2026, 08:54
24,681
-15
14 Aug 2026, 22:15
24,696
-68
13 Aug 2026, 10:08
24,764
-13
12 Aug 2026, 12:38
24,777
+22
11 Aug 2026, 15:32
24,755
-20
10 Aug 2026, 13:55
24,775
-21
9 Aug 2026, 10:51
24,796
-13
8 Aug 2026, 12:02
24,809
-9
7 Aug 2026, 12:26
24,818
-14
6 Aug 2026, 14:27
24,832
-7
6 Aug 2026, 02:45
24,839
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:38
24,839
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
29.7%
avg views ÷ 24,630 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,300
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
31 (30 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
226,420
Reactions total
12,766
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,821 reactions across 26 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,282
39.6%
custom 5249227639540953761
2,637
24.4%
👍
1,367
12.6%
custom 5803170166074248540
423
3.91%
🤯
416
3.84%
custom 5247229667999495079
386
3.57%
😭
309
2.86%
custom 5246881311792052319
249
2.30%
custom 5348270465855004913
247
2.28%
🔥
214
1.98%
custom 5249449268443364727
188
1.74%
🤣
30
0.277%
custom 5334742079081835185
29
0.268%
🍓
24
0.222%
🤔
18
0.166%
🙏
2
0.018%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,766reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 31 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prishyavayakeita. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.23%
1 of 31 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
7,650
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
7,510
over 30 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcGQnUs
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Думаю сейчас отличный момент сделать пост для классных знакомств, чтобы найти себе приятельниц по увлечениям!! Объявляю время жесткого нетворкинга в комментариях под этим постом
Возможно найдете себе классного собеседника по увлечениям, приятельниц для совместных хобби или занятия спортом, может вообще реально дойдете до стадии близких подруг! Все возможно, у меня в комментах даже работу себе находили аахахаххаха
В…
В комментах все жалеют данную особу, но меня почему-то никто не жалеет, а ведь терять подругу ощущается больнее, чем расставаться с мужиками ахахахха
Во взрослом возрасте и так тяжело создавать хорошие дружеские отношения, так когда их резко и без слов обрывают, то аж плакать хочется
Вообще без понятия как во взрослом возрасте найти себе друзей, поэтому в один момент решила для себя, что формат общения, когда вы пр…
Попала в дико странную ситуацию, потому что мой друг познакомил меня со своей подругой, сказал мы с ней похожи и реально мы с ней поймали дикий вайб, много общались, одинаково шутили, а потом она в один момент меня загостила и перестала отвечать на сообщения и вообще везде отписалась👍
Я из-за этого начала переживать и загоняться, потому что возможно что-то не так сказала, может как-то обидела, а потом оказалось, что…
У меня есть знакомая японка, очень красивая женщина в возрасте уже, прям точеная и максимально ухоженная, поэтому однажды я спросила ее секреты японской красоты, может есть что-то прям обязательное. Она начала мне рассказывать про питание, уход и занятия спортом, ничего нового, но еще добавила, что обязательно нужно спать на спине, чтобы лицо не сминалось и утром просыпаться сразу красоткой, потому что если лечь лицо…
У меня раскрошился прям на лице любимый китайский спонж для макияжа и я полезла смотреть какой-нибудь новый
В итоге наткнулась на корейский малярный валик для лица ахахахха обещают ровное тонкое покрытие, надо прями возить им по лицу как по стенам во время ремонта
Сомнительно конечно за такое платить 12 баксов, но вдруг кто пробовал? 😂
Давайте сохраним друг другу деньги и поделимся помадами/тинтами/блесками, которые оказались полнейшим разочарованием по цвету и носке на губах
Я конечно понимаю, что все индивидуально, но лучше перестраховаться хахахаха
Почему каждый раз вижу mac alone time на девушках в интернетах и он на них выглядит красивым приглушеным бежево розовым оттенком, а на мне лежит рыжим 👍
Почему нельзя сделать так, чтобы все помады выглядели на всех губах одинаково???? Я понимаю, что у всех разный цвет губ изначально, еще от цвета лица многое зависит, но как же я устала скамить сама себя мыслями о том, что вот куплю помаду и она удовлетворит меня на …
Зашла на стайлкориан наполнить корзину, а там вышла плашка, что с сентября сайт перестанет осуществлять работу с Россией 👍
Это был легендарный сайт, уродливо реву
Как же хочется сгонять в Корею на их перманент губ, потому что корейские мастера делают невероятную нежнятику по контуру и блаш, это выглядит так естественно и сексапильно, что мне кажется после такой процедуры я от своего отражения в зеркале вообще не буду отлипать ахахаха
Правда это делается в два сеанса как я поняла + прайс не знаю, нашла аккаунт мастера, но она как будто училась продажам у российских шоуромов, п…
Появилась идея фикс… хочу научиться укладывать волосы на браш, чтобы объем стоял и локоны были как у моделей виктория сикрет, но смотрю видео, пытаюсь повторить и все равно вообще ничего не получается
Я вот думаю может стоит взять какое-нибудь индивидуальное занятие по самоукладке, где мастер научит правильно держать руку с брашем и направлять фен? Кто-нибудь из вас брал такие уроки или может быть знаете хорошие тут…
Ребят, месяц назад публиковала пост с информацией о масштабном розыгрыше на wb и уже сегодня в 18:00 по Москве на прямом эфире подведут результаты! Эфир будет идти одновременно на платформах Wildberries через стрим WIbes и ВК. Приходите посмотреть и, возможно, выиграть свой приз!
Надеюсь, сумка Chanel, сертификат wb на 1.000.000 и новый iPhone достанутся кому-то из вас! Ну или хотя бы один из других 6 000 призов, ко…
Я дала волю своей внутренней бабищи и теперь, когда мужики идут по лестнице мне на встречу, то не отхожу, чтобы их пропустить
Меня достало, что люди не умеют нормально ходить и прутся навстречу, так еще и мужики подсознательно требуют уступить дорогу, А Я ЭТОГО ДЕЛАТЬ БОЛЬШЕ НЕ БУДУ
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @prishyavayakeita. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 98,615 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Врен о Японии для туриста @wrenjapan · 109,950 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Прыщавая Кейта” (@prishyavayakeita), 24,630 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prishyavayakeita.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
