12 measurements spanning 33 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,105–2,115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 23:58
2,114
+6
3 Sept 2026, 20:58
2,108
+1
31 Aug 2026, 06:34
2,107
-2
28 Aug 2026, 06:12
2,109
-2
25 Aug 2026, 16:03
2,111
+1
22 Aug 2026, 21:26
2,110
+3
19 Aug 2026, 21:03
2,107
+1
16 Aug 2026, 22:07
2,106
-2
13 Aug 2026, 11:14
2,108
+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:01
2,106
-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:01
2,107
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:01
2,107
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
706 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
207
29.3%
🤬
189
26.8%
❤
120
17.0%
💔
96
13.6%
😭
53
7.51%
🤝
17
2.41%
🗿
16
2.27%
🤔
4
0.567%
👍
2
0.283%
😱
2
0.283%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 5 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chika_shanghai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Многие уже наверное в курсе ситуации Enhypen, и я читая то что люди пишут просто в ахуе в очередной раз
В общем фанатка группы и в частности участника Ники , которая ходит почти на каждый концерт и фанмит, на концерте попросила одного участника передать Ники цветы, на что тот взял их, хотел передать но тот сказал что занят и отказался, цветы ей вернули обратно. На что она расстроилась.
Ники же после концерта выска…
И вот мне исполнилось 27 🥹
Самой себе просто желаю быть счастливой и все, хочу становиться лучшей версией себя с каждым днем, и не в смысле идеальности а просто чувствовать себя комфортнее самой с собой изо дня в день и учиться жизни
В честь др сделала себе новую прическу и покрасила волосы ахах
Спасибо всем кто читает меня все это время и остается со мной даже когда я пропадаю и ждет мои посты, я правда это очень ц…
Дорогие женщины, Китай конечно безопасное место относительно каких нибудь других стран, но это потому что тут много умных камер и строгих законов, а не потому что здесь люди другие. Здесь точно так же есть чаты долбаебские (мужскими их не могу назвать уж извините), где мужчины унижают женщин и хранят всякий ужасный контент. Я также знаю о существовании таких чатах китайцев которые живут в России и хвастаются кто с ке…
Китайские фанаты это самые страшные фанаты и случай с игрой love and deep space в очередной раз это доказал
В общем игра скорее всего схлопнется. Что же случилось?
Разработчики решили выкатить нового персонажа, который не понравился китаянкам внешне. Он был слишком накачанный , соответственно он гей (что), черты лица у него слишком грубые и ваще слишком похож на иностранца. Но так как придирка к внешности это не то…
Единственное что могло заставить меня выйти в днем в жару 40 градусов это выставка по Всеведущему Читателю
Очень рада что получилось найти компанию ахахах Настя спасибо!!
Выставка понравилась, довольно большая и атмосферная. Но стоит ли это 100 юаней если честно хз
Тематическое кафе по нему в апреле было если честно ну никакое, так что Рада что есть такой вот хороший ивентик
Вроде как идет до конца августа, билеты …
❤37🔥9
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @chika_shanghai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“шанхайская чика” (@chika_shanghai), 2,114 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chika_shanghai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
