Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -598. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,496–28,459 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 08:37
27,607
-31
18 Sept 2026, 20:56
27,638
-17
16 Sept 2026, 13:38
27,655
-33
14 Sept 2026, 18:58
27,688
-15
13 Sept 2026, 03:19
27,703
+23
11 Sept 2026, 08:19
27,680
-73
8 Sept 2026, 15:55
27,753
-57
5 Sept 2026, 08:40
27,810
-46
3 Sept 2026, 10:48
27,856
-60
2 Sept 2026, 07:58
27,916
-16
1 Sept 2026, 09:35
27,932
-48
31 Aug 2026, 06:16
27,980
-16
30 Aug 2026, 04:09
27,996
-7
29 Aug 2026, 04:46
28,003
-35
28 Aug 2026, 04:34
28,038
-47
27 Aug 2026, 01:44
28,085
-53
26 Aug 2026, 01:27
28,138
-46
25 Aug 2026, 03:02
28,184
-69
23 Aug 2026, 17:39
28,253
-95
22 Aug 2026, 05:14
28,348
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 27,607 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,560
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
62 (28 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
150,180
Reactions total
1,502
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,420
Videos
≈189
Links
≈452
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 14s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,606 reactions across 61 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5463315910817256153
1,597
44.3%
custom 5463249051061362402
460
12.8%
custom 5462959660459924134
387
10.7%
custom 5463272712036196873
266
7.38%
custom 5465556986097603300
216
5.99%
custom 5463192378967890024
167
4.63%
custom 5332395227346913983
162
4.49%
custom 5462882518552318599
141
3.91%
custom 5465158310053321455
49
1.36%
custom 5460898806302258430
47
1.30%
custom 5195258141356347245
40
1.11%
custom 5463320626691350876
34
0.943%
custom 5465442310470802887
31
0.86%
custom 5220228479919870602
7
0.194%
custom 5195230142464544794
2
0.055%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,606 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
50
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 61 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PIE_style. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вчера вечером были на открытии нового магазина трехэтажного особняка Studio Slow на Пятницкой.
Дружу с ребятами уже много лет и считаю, что они одни из немногих, кто в действительности имеет право называться «концепт стором».
Получив приглашение я понял, что не могу прийти с пустыми руками.
Это как прийти на др без подарка!
И тут я начал думать, какая пластинка будет созвучна с их новым магазином.
Времени заказыва…
Кожаные ароматы🌟
Есть ароматы, которые пахнут чистой рубашкой или морским воздухом, а есть те, которые хочется носить вместе с тяжёлым пальто, шерстью
и кожаной курткой.
Кожаные ароматы — это отдельный мир. Причём кожа в парфюмерии далеко не всегда пахнет буквально кожей. Она может быть мягкой и замшевой, сухой и древесной, дымной, дегтярной, смолистой или даже немного животной.
Именно поэтому осень — пожалуй, сам…
Кажется, в 2026-м стало модно…
не быть модным.
Последние несколько лет мы жили в мире, где для любого вкуса существовало название.
Олдмани, горпкор, тихая роскошь, нормкор — выбери свою коробочку, купи пять вещей из неё и готово:
у тебя есть стиль! А лучше купи «гайд по стилю» от ig стилистов.😁
Сейчас всё чаще хочется не собрать идеальный образ, а просто найти вещи, которые нравятся лично тебе.
За счет классного ф…
Сегодня подборка про запахи! 💛
Неважно, парфюм это, крем для рук или что-то ещё. Важно лишь то, какое чувство оставляет после себя аромат.
Я подготовил для вас небольшую подборку с любимыми уходовыми средствами и ароматами на осень:
💚Парфюм Amouage Interlude 53
💚Гель для душа L’Occitane
💚Дезодорант Cedre Encens
💚Парфюм B683 Extrait
💚Гель для душа Zielinski & Rozen
💚Крем для рук Combawa
💚Парфюм Clive Christian
Нап…
Кажется, C2H4 повзрослел.
Или просто устал от будущего.
В новой зимней коллекции 2026 бренд, который когда-то любил космос, химию, технологии и одежду человека из 2087 года, внезапно оглянулся назад.
50–60-е, старые интерьеры, мебель, винтажные силуэты и вещи, которые выглядят так, будто уже пожили до того, как попасть в ваш гардероб.
MA-2, Harrington, Hunting jacket, шерстяные куртки и пальто — всё довольно споко…
ЗДОРОВО И ВЕЧНО
Сегодня мы были на выставке «Трава по пояс», которая проходит в центре Вознесенского.
Выставка посвящена Егору Летову.
Но не как музыканту, а как художнику.
По правде говоря, мало кто знает, что Егор достаточно много занимался визуальным искусством.
Большая часть выставки посвящена его коллажам, некоторые из которых потом становились обложками его альбомов. И это, пожалуй — моя любимая часть экспоз…
Обожаю Studio Slow за их концептульаный
подход ко всему, что они делают!
Сегодня они мне прислали вот такой флипбук — приглашение на открытые их флагманского магазина в Москве. Это вау! ❤️🔥
Девушки, сегодня для вас! 🙂
В комментариях вы просили меня делать подборки не только для
парней — исправлюсь!
Парни, прошу понять и простить: сегодняшняя подборка актуальных осенних вещей с Lamoda — исключительно для девушек.
💧 СМОТРЕТЬ ПОДБОРКУ
(с выключенным vpn)
Девчата! 🙂
Напишите в комментариях — как вам?
Делать такие подборки чаще или у меня все-такие лучше получается давать рекомендации мужчинам?
Как я лишился модельной девственности! 🩷
Шутки — шутками, но это правда.
До сегодняшнего дня меня ни разу не фотографировал незнакомый человек.
Прохожие не в счет)
Недавно в иг я наткнулся на акк Полины, подписался и понял, что хочу, чтобы она пофотографировала меня на пленку. Ну и написал ей…
Сегодня весь день мы придумывали всякие «дурацкие» кадры. Отсняли 3 катушки пленки, но забыли снять хотя бы один бекстейдж…
Gosha Kartsev х Befree
Сегодня у стилиста и дизайнера Гоши Карцева вышла коллекция для Befree.
Вдохновившись коллаборацией, Гоша снял личный фотопроект со своим отцом Виктором Александровичем,
на их родной земле — Камчатке.
Где черный песок и серое небо перекликаются с цветами коллекции. Получилась история про диалог поколений, который происходит прямо сейчас.
Хочется отметить, что визуал получился дико мощный! Да…
Кеды из подземелья?!
Анпакинг очень любопытной коллаборации брендов «Два Мяча» и «Подземелья Чикен Карри». Да-да, того самого шоу Александра Гудкова на YouTube.
Все же смотрели? 👀
Настоящий артефакт для фанатов шоу!
Модель основана на классическом силуэте 1965 года. На кедах изображены бывшие союзники, а ныне непримиримые соперники: падший рыцарь Сфинктерион — на правой, а храбрая крыса Лариса — на левой.
Кеды вы…
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @PIE_style. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PIE” (@PIE_style), 27,607 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PIE_style.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.