Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for EQUILIBRIUM

Channel

EQUILIBRIUM

@EQUILIBRIUM2019

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,750subscribers

+276 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001386625129
TypeChannel
Username@EQUILIBRIUM2019
Created19 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EQUILIBRIUM2019

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,700 average views per post against 11,450 subscribers — an engagement rate of 102.6%. Across the 24,006 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.52% and 23.2%, with a median of 11.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured32 of 32 published in the window (0 exact, 32 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled375,780
Mature posts only68.3% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers11,450 measured 15 August 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 24,006 channels · p10 2.56% · p25 5.52% · p50 11.6% · p75 23.2% · p90 41.4%
Position in cohort99.363th percentile · 8.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.264% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,45011,75011,6006 August 2026 — 11,474 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,474 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,473 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,468 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,476 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,485 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,477 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,470 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,462 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,455 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,450 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,750 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net +276. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,405–11,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:4411,750+300
15 Aug 2026, 00:1711,450-5
13 Aug 2026, 16:0811,455-7
12 Aug 2026, 14:4911,462-8
11 Aug 2026, 16:4211,470-7
10 Aug 2026, 17:3111,477-8
9 Aug 2026, 20:2211,485+9
8 Aug 2026, 18:0411,476+8
7 Aug 2026, 17:3411,468-5
6 Aug 2026, 15:2511,473-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:1511,474no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:0811,474first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
99.9%
avg views ÷ 11,750 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,700
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.49%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held32 (30 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total375,780
Reactions total5,584
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,584 reactions across 32 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯2,77949.8%
😁78614.1%
🤣63511.4%
🤬2784.98%
🤮2344.19%
👍2073.71%
🔥1182.11%
1091.95%
🤡981.76%
🤯601.07%
👏581.04%
😢540.967%
💩330.591%
😈220.394%
🍾180.322%
🙈110.197%
🤷‍♀100.179%
🥱100.179%
🤪90.161%
🗿80.143%
18 further kinds470.842%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,584reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC≈8,270 views133 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️Новости из параллельной реальности! Зачем тогда была обязательная эвакуация объявлена из сел Днепропетровской, Харьковской и Херсонских областей, и из районов Славянска и Краматорска? 🤡🤔🤡 https://t.me/batalionmonako/64458

😁57💯44🤣12😈9🦄54🥰1😭1

14 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC≈133,000 views298 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️Current situation, Ёпт! 🤡🤦‍♂️🤡

🤮174💯72😁23💩13🤣7🤡4😈21

14 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC≈9,400 views119 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️Источники информации в последнее время не устают радовать! 🤡🤦‍♂️🤡

😁93🤷‍♀9🤣54🤪4💩2🤔1😎1

13 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈9,150 views152 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️У этой страны с международными экспертами и этическими советами во главе - нет будущего. Рассекреченные материалы НСРД по Стефанишиной, Кучерявенко и Кривоносу, никого НХ не смутили. Ебаный пиздец. Нужно с этой территории уебывать. 😡😡😡 https://t.me/sudua/53008

💯85👍32😢14🤬126🌚2😁1

11 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC≈10,100 views219 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️А где этот великий воин клоун Борис Джонсон, решивший, что лучше воевать чем договариваться? 🤔🤡🤔🤡🤔🤡 https://t.me/magaukr/2243

💯178🤮23🤬8😈4😁21🤣1🤷‍♀1

11 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈9,630 views182 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️А что там с Курской операцией нашего генералиссимуса? Странная какая-то тишина! Она еще идет или уже закончена? А на сколько реализованы другие планы по принуждению РФ 🇷🇺 к миру, план внутреннего укрепления страны и план выхода к границам 1991 года? 🤡🤔🤡 https://t.me/spletnicca/23972

💯127🤣34💩9🤡7🔥1🥰1🥱1😁1

9 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC≈8,940 views259 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️Он не слабоумен. Он охуевший от безнаказанности долбоеб. Судить будем как вменяемого и по всей строгости закона. 😡😡😡 https://t.me/magaukr/2236

💯212👍19🤣12🔥52👌2💩2🤯2

9 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈8,310 views83 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️Полностью согласны с наши Другом Александром! Но, есть вопрос от которого у нас возникает когнитивный диссонанс! Почему тогда, как недавно стало известно, на конкурсе в члены Высшего совета правосудия, Николай Кучерявенко, тот что отчим дебильноватого реформатора-соросенка Миши Жернакова, был «сбит» этими же соросятами, при том, что за Семена Кривоноса именно Кучерявенко «нагибала» лично Стефанишина, что подт

🔥45👍207👏5😁3🍾1🤮1🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC≈8,340 views89 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️Неужели она и есть Миндич, ёпт!? 🤡🤔🤡 https://t.me/bankovamail/44541

😁66🤮11🤪5👏3😢31

8 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC≈6,280 views267 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @magaukrPhoto

«США и другие страны НАТО по сути финансировали и вели прокси-войну с Россией, а украинских мужчин похищают, отправляют на передовую и безжалостно убивают. Каждый несет ответственность за это.», - Тэйлор Грин. Такими темпами, на пятый год, политики в США заметят, что не только мужчин похищают и убивают, а еще и зарабатывают на этом большие деньги. А Зеленский - не президент, потому что у него окончился срок полномо

💯208👍31😢167🤣3🤮1🫡1

7 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC≈7,790 views118 reactionsread 15 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️Не за це стояв Майдан, ёпт! Да, кастрюльки? 🤡🤦‍♂️🤡🤦‍♂️🤡🤦‍♂️ https://t.me/sudua/52856

💯75🤣382😢2🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC≈9,380 views197 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️Зеленскому не показывайте! 🤡🤦‍♂️🤡 Аресты за предположения о возможных действиях в будущее! Министр юстиции Канады заявил, что власти разрабатывают закон, который позволит помещать людей под домашний арест с электронным браслетом, если кто-то заявит об опасениях, что в будущем они могут опубликовать в интернете нечто противоправное или опасное — даже если никаких действий с их стороны ещё не было. P.S. Тольк

🤣84🤯55🤬27💯169🖕3🕊1🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @EQUILIBRIUM2019. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 9,871 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Неарестович
@nearestovich_official · 98,467
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
Женщина с косой
@skosoi · 108,783
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
MediaKiller
@MediaKiller2021 · 104,837
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Сплетница
@spletnicca · 139,244
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Dubinsky.pro
@dubinskypro · 157,854
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Absolution Leaks 🇪🇺
@absolutionlab · 152,697
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Наблюдатель
@nabludatels · 106,993
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
➕Ігор Мосійчук 🦏
@mosiychuk72 · 508,050
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“EQUILIBRIUM” (@EQUILIBRIUM2019), 11,750 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EQUILIBRIUM2019.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.