Channel
@odesskiy_rezident
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
102subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001960917895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @odesskiy_rezident |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/odesskiy_rezident |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 102 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 101 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 101 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (10 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 177 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 36.7% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 6.67% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✍️ В целом, "весёлая" сегодня выдалась ночка для 🅱️укро-Орков в 📵Одессе. У меня стекла дрожали. Но за 4 года войны такие удары никогда не носили системный характер. Не похоже, что и в этот раз. Такие удары нужно наносить каждую неделю, тогда через пол годика или даже меньше у 🅱️укро-Орков настанет коллапс. Ради такого я готов даже какое-то время посидеть где-нибудь в Румынии и понаблюдать как из 🈹Одессы начнётся масс…
👍1
🅱️ТЦК в 🈹Одессе, в последние дни, бъёт рекорды активности. Теперь они просто повсюду, особенно в рабочее время. Похоже пушечного мяса у 🆎укро-Орков всё меньше и меньше на нуле. Так что совет землякам, - покупайте бумажки с отсрочкой заранее, ибо, чтобы выйти после того, как вас примут сейчас стоит каких-то невменяемых денег. Минимальный ценник, что я слышал за выход из ТЦК - 10К $$$.
🤔1🙏1
✍️ Стоял я сегодня под этой 26ой Жемчужиной в момент прилёта. Дрон летел со стороны Аркадии в направлении порта, прямо в том районе стояло в это время два МОГа, которые долбили прямо по дрону, причем их не смущал тот факт, что кругом эти человейники стоят и их "работа" в случае успеха уронит дрон аккурат на них. О чём это говорит ? На гражданских 🅱️укро-оркам положить с прибором. Если понадобится пожертвовать ВСЕМИ …
🤬2
✍️ Просто поражаюсь трансформации 🚳 России за последние 100 с лишним лет. Из уважаемой всем миром 🚳 Державы она сначала превратилась в одну большую колонию под названием СССР, потом снова стала на мгновение Россией с надеждой на восстановление, потом пришел ноунэйм Путин и Россия стала РФией - похожим на восставший из ада труп СССР, питающийся подорожавшей нефтью как кровью. Кто-то скажет: но ведь Путин "поднял Росс…
💯2🤔1
Наблюдаю все чаще в эти дни дискуссии на тему того, как так получилось, что поезд сделал круг и снова заходит на станцию - страна словно вновь подбирается к перепутью, подобному тому, что было накануне 90-х. Кто-то считает, что причина - в классическом административном подходе “живем только раз”, другие считают, что это - попытка переиграть “крупнейшую геополитическую катастрофу 20-го века”. А я полагаю, что и то, и…
💯1
🈹📷 Одесса начала 20го века — Аэропорт Лузановка 1956 год (оригинал и реставрация) В 50-х годах ХХ-го столетия попасть на пляж в Лузановке можно было не только на трамвае, но и самолете. Четыре пассажирских ЛИ-2( фактически Douglas DC-3, США) по выходным дням доставляли пляжников с территории Одесского аэродрома до санатория имени Джержинского в Лузановке. За день самолеты могли перевезти до 450 человек. Вот как зву…
👍3🤡1
⚡️✍️ Земляки, если слышите характерный визг☯️ fpv дронов-перехватчиков над головой, не стойте и не смотрите, как персонажи на видео! Эти дроны, P1-SUN(или писюн) при взрыве создают облако поражающих элементов, которые летят во все стороны. Момент подрыва чаще всего определяет бортовой ИИ. Из-за такого осколка сегодня погибла 26-летняя девушка на Ланжероне. В России такие дроны (с БЧ) пока запрещено применять в город…
🙏3🤔1🤡1
✍️Сергей Караганов. С удовольствием слушаю его аналитику и размышления об истории России. Не со всем согласен, особенно с его поверхностной критикой режима Путина, но многое — в точку.
👍2😁1
✍️С умилением смотрю как некоторые российские турбо-патритические блогеры, помешанные на теме 🤖ИИ, но не имеющие никакого понятия как это "магическое" ИИ функционирует, ищут теорию заговора там где её никто, кроме таких они не видят. Сегодня во всем мире отключили 5ую версию модельки Антропик — Claude Fable(Mythos). Правительство США, якобы, усмотрела в ней угрозу нац. безопасности. Я успел ее погонять - ничего све…
💯1🤔1
🈹📷 Одесса начала 20го века — 1936 год Все фото - отреставрированные оригиналы. Обратите внимание, как раньше выглядели наш «Черноморец» и Таможенная(Карантинная) площадь. 📵 #одесса_начала_20го_века
👍5❤2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @odesskiy_rezident. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,420,311 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Одесский Резидент” (@odesskiy_rezident), 102 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/odesskiy_rezident.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.