Channel
@CC_Crypto_Tips
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
114,951subscribers
-818 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002046950362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CC_Crypto_Tips |
| Description | Trustworthy source of crypto news and latest information, as well as tips for crypto trading around the world. Note that this is not financial advice. Always do your own research! Contact - @TheeLinguine Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/CC_Crypto_Tips |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CC_Crypto_Tips |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 114,951 | -176 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 115,127 | -183 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 115,310 | -142 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 115,452 | -193 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 115,645 | -124 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 115,769 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 115,769 | first reading |
58 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 58 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 50,315 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 83.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NEW: 🟠 Breez introduces Glow 🙌 The bitcoin app anyone can use, and any developer can explore. Passkey Login. Stable Balance. Lightning Address. Send USDT/USDC. And so much more. This is what bitcoin UX should feel like. 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
JUST IN: 🇸🇪 $460 billion Swedish SEB Bank just disclosed it has increased its stake in #Bitcoin treasury company Strategy $MSTR by 1%, bringing its total holdings to 53,837 shares ($5.28 million). The largest bank in Sweden 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
AMAZING: 🟠 Someone moved 500 BTC worth $32 million for a transaction fee of only $0.12. 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
EU regulators warn crypto scams are rising as fraudsters exploit MiCA-related shutdowns by impersonating exchanges and watchdogs. Firms that missed the July 1 licensing deadline must tell customers to move their assets, creating an opening for criminals to exploit the confusion. Only 323 crypto firms are licensed, while more than 1,700 may have to close. 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
NEW: 🇦🇹 $258 billion Austrian banking giant Raiffeisen Bank International just disclosed it has increased its stake in #Bitcoin treasury company Strategy $MSTR by 3,080%. 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
ICYMI: 🇺🇸 $86 billion Mizuho Bank says Clarity Act will NOT pass in August "It will happen at some point, but not in 2026." 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
Putin signs Russia's first comprehensive cryptocurrency law, legalising regulated trading from September 1. Only the most liquid coins, including BTC, ETH and USDT, will be approved for trading through licensed exchanges supervised by Russia's central bank. Crypto payments remain banned. 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
❤2
FYI: 🟠 $10 billion investment bank Maxim Group has lowered its price target on #Bitcoin treasury company Strategy $MSTR from $250 to $215 and maintains a buy rating. That's still a 120% upside. 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
NEW: 🇺🇸 Sen. Rick Scott says Sen. Lummis has "Worked her butt off with the Clarity Act" and urges the Senate to stay and pass the bill: "We’ve got to figure out how do we get these things done…We’ve got to stay here and start talking to each other.” 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
❤2
NEW: 🇷🇺 Russia President Putin has signed a law providing comprehensive regulation for digital assets and rights for investors 👀 "The legislation governs the organization, accounting, and custody of digital currencies and foreign digital instruments." 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
❤1
JUST IN: 🟠 $15 billion investment bank TD Cowen analyst Lance Vitanza just said, "We have a buy rating on #Bitcoin treasury company Strive $ASST with a price target of $28, and a buy rating on its preferred stock $SATA." "We have a very constructive outlook on Strive." 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
JUST IN: 🟠 Publicly traded #Bitcoin mining company Cipher Digital $CIFR has sold 470 BTC to fund AI data center development and now holds a total of 646 BTC. Bitcoin 100 Ranking: 58 💰 CC | Crypto Tips 💰
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @CC_Crypto_Tips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 747,227 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CC Crypto Tips” (@CC_Crypto_Tips), 114,951 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CC_Crypto_Tips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.