🚨🗣️ English legend John Barnes on how the Premier League table will finish in the upcoming season: "I think Arsenal and Man City will be the two favorites." "Then it'll be Liverpool, Manchester United, Chelsea, so I think that will be the top five."

Channel
Sky Sports Football | Soccer
@TheFootballCity
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
285,480subscribers
-3,636 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001277519716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TheFootballCity |
| Description | 🚨 Your fastest source for football updates, breaking news, memes, fan reactions, match previews, viral moments, and football chaos. Turn on notifications 🔔 • UNOFFICIAL Business - @BeRickSanchezBot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TheFootballCity |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 285,480 | -614 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 286,094 | -676 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 286,770 | -606 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:58 | 287,376 | -626 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 288,002 | -550 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 288,552 | -564 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 289,116 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 289,116 | first reading |
Engagement
328 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.084%
- avg views ÷ 285,480 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 240
- 328 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 328
- of 328 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 323 of 328 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 328 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 78,822 |
| Reactions total | 3,205 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,840
- Videos
- ≈295
- Links
- ≈2,630
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,205 reactions across 323 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 587 | 18.3% | |
| 🔥 | 396 | 12.4% | |
| 🥰 | 328 | 10.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 285 | 8.89% | |
| 😍 | 274 | 8.55% | |
| 👍 | 273 | 8.52% | |
| 😎 | 226 | 7.05% | |
| 👏 | 216 | 6.74% | |
| ⚡ | 201 | 6.27% | |
| 🎉 | 201 | 6.27% | |
| 😁 | 173 | 5.40% | |
| 🤣 | 24 | 0.749% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 0.156% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.156% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.125% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 0.094% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.031% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.031% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.031% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.031% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 323 of the 328 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 328 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗜𝗡: Liverpool are getting closer to sign Bradley Barcola for €125m. The contract would be valid until 2032. — @NicoSchira
😍3❤1
🚨 𝗗𝗜𝗗 𝗬𝗢𝗨 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪: PSG have paid Barcelona €333m for transfers in the past decade.
🔥2❤1👏1
🚨 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗜𝗡: Barcelona are considering several options to reinforce the CB position. Among the candidates, Aymeric Laporte, Castello Lukeba, and Natan are the ones that stand out. — @sport
⚡2
🚨🗣️ Neymar on all the pressure from Santos' fans: "We’re in two competitions, in the round of 16, quarterfinals… We have to enjoy it! Every time we make a bad pass, the criticism comes right away." "Cheer, applaud! I respect and agree with those who boo at the end, but not during the game." "I played at Vila Belmiro years ago, and all the teams used to say: ‘damn, playing at Vila is tough as hell’. Nowadays, IT’S …
🔥2❤🔥1
🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Chelsea want €140m for Enzo Fernandez, or he STAYS. Enzo's representatives were in contact with Manchester City yesterday; everything is in hands of Manchester City and their willingness to pay. — @FabrizioRomano
❤🔥2🔥1
🚨 𝗝𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗜𝗡: Chelsea will NOT consider offers for Enzo Fernandez in January. It has to be in this transfer window, or if not until the next summer. — @peterrutzler
🥰3❤1🔥1
🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Leicester City is UP FOR SALE. The owners of the club, King Power, hope to sell for around €230m. — @BBCSport
🔥3❤2
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Rodri’s move to Barcelona is expected to cost the club €210m in total, including the transfer fee, commissions, and salary. — @diarioas
❤4🥰1
🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Ousmane Dembélé is again the FAVOURITE to score the most goals in Ligue 1 next season, per odds.
❤4⚡1😍1
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Eva Carneiro has HIT BACK at José Mourinho and John Terry after the infamous 2015 Chelsea incident was revisited in Mourinho’s new Netflix documentary. Eva Carneiro insists she had NO CHOICE but to enter the pitch to treat Eden Hazard after the referee called the medical team on and Hazard himself requested treatment. “We are bound by a medico-legal code of conduct. Genuinely, it would be healthy for Jo…
❤1👍1
🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Hansi Flick has once again asked Barcelona to keep pushing for Julián Álvarez and to continue trying to sign him until the very end. — @gerardromero
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 328 posts we hold for @TheFootballCity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 618,699 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@fabrizioromano · 16,79518 postsgerard romero
@gerardromero · 215 postsSport
@sport · 14,2695 posts𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗦𝗲𝗮 🐙 Crypto News
@dontmisssssit · 834 postsMoretto & Romano
@MatteMoretto · 1503 postsGastón Edul🇦🇷
@gastonedul · 1972 postsJijantesFC
@JijantesFC · 3412 posts.
@MikeVerweij · 32 postsFC BARCELONA
@victor_nahe · 152 postsBet365 ⚽ Football • Soccer • NBA
@bet365 · 3,1511 postDAILY MAIL
@dailymail · 701 postDavid Ornstein
@David_Ornstein · 17,1841 postGianluca DiMarzio
@Dimarzio · 4931 postindykaila News
@indykaila · 1011 postCadena SER
@La_SER · 8601 postphoto_illusions
@photo_illusions · 41 postPREMIER LEAGUE ANALYSIS ⚽️
@SamiMokbel_BBC · 681 postTransfermarkt
@santi_j_fm · 2111 post@TheAthleticFC
@TheAthleticFC · 3971 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@TheFootballCity named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@MarketMatrixAI · 90,753#1
@hamster_kombat · 22,050,511#2
@blumcrypto · 15,605,597#3
@realgoats_channel · 5,052,029#4
@odes_ai · 370,267#5
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,896,161#6
@CinemaUpdatesOrg · 84,515#7
@catgoldminerann · 961,460#8
@hayzonn · 3,050,118#9
@seedupdates · 8,888,511#10
@mr_bitcoin_trade · 154,843#11
@mediarussia · 1,252,935#12
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,721,886#13
@crypto_gst · 599,398#14
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,669,303#15
@eeusd · 1,202,216#16
@hotonnear · 4,932,833#17
@CryptoKingKeyur · 718,459#18
@trendingapps · 4,006,943#19
@PVROrginal · 52,072#20
@tonkeeper_news · 5,067,458#21
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,346,541#22
@KeyGen_Channel · 199,060#23
@gameechannel · 2,000,051#24
@autoruss · 883,108#25
@vestirussia · 1,048,076#26
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,263,056#27
@deckforge_official · 2,207,761#28
@TaskNChannel · 971,058#29
@mastercryptohq · 278,215#30
@ToNmetasilense · 2,985,495#31
@dogs · 7,497,617#32
@tomarket_ai · 7,229,394#33
@Cats_housewtf · 8,663,588#34
@notcoin · 9,196,576#35
@catapult_extreme · 9,227,875#36
@theyescoin · 6,194,306#37
@catizenann · 3,795,603#38
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,297,379#39
@rockyrabbitio · 3,701,241#40
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,325,754#41
@banana_update · 1,476,744#42
@fx_holding_community · 6,569,458#43
@TonAirDrop_EN · 594,667#44
@pigscrew · 2,276,981#45
@tapswapai · 10,922,461#46
@gram · 7,028,251#47
@iamalexfalcon · 3,329,278#48
@token_1win · 3,164,500#49
@lenvies · 1,661,855#50
@theTapCoins · 3,116,978#51
@boomloudcoin · 1,757,053#52
@onerussia · 1,509,027#53
@dotcoincommunity · 4,241,240#54
@onus_globalchannel · 1,756,821#55
@monorixofficial · 1,417,913#56
@money · 3,266,026#57
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,297,700#58
@hexnio · 2,112,485#59
@coincoinai · 1,906,622#60
@tapraccooncoin · 183,776#61
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,655,924#62
@KongsJungleRoom · 112,344#63
@tonstationgames · 3,407,403#64
@nomis_protocol · 1,631,122#65
@builders · 3,586,420#66
@watbird · 1,558,862#67
@therealyescoin · 2,205,650#68
@the_vertus · 2,258,688#69
@babydogecoin · 1,076,739#70
@fintopionews · 2,452,360#71
@theFreeDogs_ANN · 1,782,209#72
@corn_battles · 1,098,266#73
@CherryTrendingEVM · 928,298#74
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,150,103#75
@smpl_app · 1,714,872#76
@avagoldcoin · 1,868,252#77
@Birds_announcement · 1,637,706#78
@boopupdates · 1,387,109#79
@metazoneofficial · 592,734#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mr_bitcoin_trade · 154,843
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
@KeyGen_Channel · 199,060
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@crypto_gst · 599,398
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
@iPapkorn · 1,937,305
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 August 2026
@mediarussia · 1,252,935
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 August 2026
@odes_ai · 370,267
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
@hamster_kombat · 22,050,511
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 August 2026
@hamster_digest · 3,128
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
@CryptoKingKeyur · 718,459
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 August 2026
@eeusd · 1,202,216
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@mastercryptohq · 278,215
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
@catgoldminerann · 961,460
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,896,161
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 7 August 2026
@onerussia · 1,509,027
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
@tonkeeper_news · 5,067,458
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 August 2026
@RidingExtreme · 219,425
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@TonAirDrop_EN · 594,667
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
@tapraccooncoin · 183,776
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@mr_tony · 272,638
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
@baks_ton · 5,642,498
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 August 2026
@cryptokanishkchaudharypremium · 146,908
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
@capybaranation · 144,809
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@Forex_Trade_433et · 149,511
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@lenvies · 1,661,855
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 54 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sky Sports Football | Soccer” (@TheFootballCity), 285,480 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheFootballCity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.