Channel
@T0N_Gems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
71,446subscribers
-281 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002033605126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @T0N_Gems |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/T0N_Gems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 71,446 | -133 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 71,579 | -93 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 71,672 | -55 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 71,727 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
DUROV vs RKN. ROUND 2 🟢On April 1, RKN learned how to detect and jam Telegram proxies across Russia. Massive outages, thousands of complaints, and the messenger simply stopped working for many. 🟢3 days. It took Durov only 3 days. Today’s update hides proxies from RKN once again. Currently in beta for PC and Android. 🟢RKN strikes, Durov fixes. An arms race just like 2018, only more serious.
🎁 Portals is dropping new updates. 50 percent cashback and long awaited refunds. Casino is open. The roulette with cool prizes is already in the game. But the main thing is cashback for Vice Cream trading. Floor is already 2.24 TON with 1.22 cost price. Trading volume is breaking records. ⚠️Check your inventory. The first wave of error refunds has already been sent and the second one is on the way. Go check if any …
The market is currently driven by manipulations: TON is following BTC, and if Bitcoin drops to $50k, TON will inevitably hit $0.7, where the real support zones are. Holding in such a market is a huge risk that could cost you -90% of your deposit, so it’s better to avoid illusions and stay in dollars. Sleep well, don’t catch falling knives, and wait for better entry prices 💎
🎁 Your Redos for gifts from my profile. Quantity is a priority. Serious offers only, please. 🔴If the volume and price are right, I’ll offer additional exclusive items. I am also open to trading my channel for interesting offers - @utixe ◀️ 🎁🎁🎁 🎁 🎁 Join This Giveaway! 🏆 Prizes: • Ion Gem #3687 • Ion Gem #3782 • Ion Gem #4291 • ...and 47 more prizes! ⏰ Deadline: 03.02.2026 12:59 UTC
We’ve all seen dozens of tap-to-earn projects and “memecoins” promising the moon, only to vanish within a week. 👉MORI is a completely different story: 🔵 Behind MORI stands Professor Moriarty - a man who spent years building his cult and community, not just some random meme-generated nobody. 🔵 His audience is real: 3.2 million on YouTube, 200k on Telegram, and billions of views across the internet. No bots, no fake …
🎉 Giveaway Finished! Winners received the following gifts: 🎁 Reward: Restless Jar #51267
🎁 Started Gifts Giveaway! Details: 🎁 Subscribe: @Gift_Fight, @pengu_arena 🎁 Deadline: 27.06.2025 18:03 UTC 🎁 Other links: #MORISECT, MINT 🎁 Reward: Restless Jar #51267 Participants can now join this giveaway. Good luck 🎁
🔥 Coin by Moriarty. Meme cult, XP grind, $150k and a Rolls. Top-tier drop, XP system, madness and momentum. 👉 Join now #MORISECT
📊 Is the market starting to turn green? Portals is almost ahead of all marketplaces — gifts are being scooped up there faster than anywhere else. Looks like first place is just a matter of time. 🎁 Market cap is growing. Many gifts are returning to their peak levels. Weak hands are out. Seems like the correction is behind us… but nothing is certain yet. ▶️ Check the chart: @gift_charts Though the info field is sti…
📉 Why is crypto red today? Israel launched new strikes on Iran, and the market is panicking. Investors are fleeing risk assets, and crypto took a sharp dive. I, on the other hand, had a nice morning bonus. Jumped into Rolls and won gifts worth 444 TON While the correction continues, I staked all my gifts in Rolls. TON rewards drop every week, and payouts go to your linked wallet every Saturday. Plus, referral bon…
💪RECORD-BREAKING BICEPS SALE! What do you think about this deal? ▶️ 30 un-upgraded Biceps, sold together with the account, went for $50,000! That’s $1,666 per Bicep.
🏴Azuki Shao are now available in Palace! Open market and hurry up to buy new collection if you didn’t buy it at Sticker Pack
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @T0N_Gems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,232,101 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@T0N_Gems named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ton Gems” (@T0N_Gems), 71,446 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/T0N_Gems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.