ПЕРЕКЛИЧКА! ;) И если кто вдруг пропустил утреннюю Линейку на Катарсисе... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWgD22RNjCU
❤63🔥15👏7
Signed Миха Анархист

Channel
@MihaChaplyha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
102,011subscribers
-236 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001218522026 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MihaChaplyha |
| Description | РЕКОНКИСТА НЕИЗБЕЖНА (с) Секта Свидетелей Носков и Сандалей САТИРА, ЮМОР, ИРОНИЯ на основе субъективной аналитики вне политики. Чат тут: https://t.me/ReconquistaUA Правила: https://telegra.ph/PRAVILA-CHATA-RECONQUISTA-UA-05-09 |
| Created | 16 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MihaChaplyha |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 102,011 | -55 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 102,066 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 102,092 | -53 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 102,145 | -44 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 102,189 | -37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 102,226 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 102,247 | first reading |
120 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 120 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,159,910 |
| Reactions total | 27,187 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27,187 reactions across 120 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,378 | 30.8% | |
| 😁 | 6,689 | 24.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4,679 | 17.2% | |
| 💯 | 3,446 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 2,198 | 8.08% | |
| 🫡 | 797 | 2.93% | |
| 👏 | 377 | 1.39% | |
| 👌 | 205 | 0.754% | |
| 🙏 | 155 | 0.57% | |
| 💋 | 73 | 0.269% | |
| 😍 | 62 | 0.228% | |
| 🤝 | 48 | 0.177% | |
| 🥰 | 47 | 0.173% | |
| 😘 | 29 | 0.107% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 0.015% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 120 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27,187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MihaChaplyha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 120 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ПЕРЕКЛИЧКА! ;) И если кто вдруг пропустил утреннюю Линейку на Катарсисе... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWgD22RNjCU
❤63🔥15👏7
Signed Миха Анархист
Та да да даммм… Следствие в ФРГ рассматривает две основные версии атаки БПЛА на украинский самолет в Лейпциге. Среди них - причастность самой Украины, - Die Zeit... "Первая теория заключается в том, что рассматривается Украина. Она хорошо разбирается в беспилотниках и могла быть заинтересована в операции под чужим флагом. То есть в атаке, которая должна была выглядеть как российская, чтобы побудить немецкое общест…
😁90👍31🔥20👏10💯7❤5
Signed Миха Анархист
Ну... это будет интересно понаблюдать... Путин: "Мы вынуждены будем отвечать зеркально. И не обязательно в тех акваториях, где планируются набеги на наши корабли и суда. А там, где уже мы сами посчитаем это нужным и целесообразным. В любом месте. В том числе и в зоне ответственности Тихоокеанского флота»... Пора закрыть тему с Международным Морским "Правом"...
🔥58💯25👏21❤9🫡4
Signed Миха Анархист
Чисто спортивный интерес... а сделать это ВОПРЕКИ КУ и СУВЕРЕНИТЕТУ - это не "зрада"? Или "зрада" только называть это "внешним управлением"? Международные эксперты, которым сейчас дается в Украине право решающего голоса в кадровых конкурсах по отбору судей, а также руководителей контролирующих структур и правоохранительных органов, могут продвигать интересующих их кандидатов на должности и при этом сами не являются…
💯61😁18❤7🔥5
Signed Миха Анархист
Ахринеть уровень анал-и-тики у Политико... сдулись в говно... Зеленский не мог ничего иного сказать... как и Украина... ибо КРЫМ. И каким нахер "частично признанным"... Абхазия и Приднестровье тоже? Politico пишет о «балканской оплошности» Зеленского после его поездки в Сербию, где он заявил, что Украина по-прежнему не будет признавать независимость Косово, что вызвало конфликт с этим частично признанным государство…
💯40😁21❤8🔥8
Signed Миха Анархист
Ахринеть! Боря Патлатый вышел и заявил, что то Власть решила воевать дальше, а он только сказал, что поддержит решение... Но сказал, что заявления о том, что это якобы он сорвал переговоры - нарратив Кремля... Но... это ведь Ара и Хамия заявляли... Да и... Вы знаете... я верю Патлатому... Как в той истории с Временной Защитой СОБСТВЕННЫХ Граждан... когда ЕС пришлось развести руками и сказать, что это Украинская В…
🔥104💯103❤25😁20🫡5👍3
Signed Миха Анархист
Просто... ;)
❤403🔥77👍26👏26😁16😍9🫡1
Signed Миха Анархист
Новостей реально нет... Но есть свежий нарратив: "Кто не воевал - не имеет права на госуправление"... Отличный нарратив - адабряю. "Кто не жарил скумбрию - не имеет права шить ботинки". Хорошие ботинки будут! ))) Со скумбрией. И нарративы яркие: Кто не скачет - тот... Кто раздражает - того в Армию... На госслужбу - как в ГАИшники - с полосатой палкой, знаком и премией за выслугу в чистке ботинок... Сперва Госупра…
💯610🔥124❤83😁36🫡11👏5
Signed Миха Анархист
Дорогая передача! А по средам чуть не плача, Вся Канатчикова Дача до Катарсису рвалась. Вместо, чтоб поесть, помыться, уколоться и забыться, Вся безумная больница у экрана собралась... ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWgD22RNjCU
🔥189❤64👍38😁19🫡5
Signed Миха Анархист
Добранок Шановні Парафіяни! ЛІНІЙКА!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! О 7-00! На Катарисі... Сьогодні поговоримо про мобілізацію в РФ, думки Полякової та Яблуко і РФ... Потім традиційно назбираю новин... Тож смачної кави Посполиті! Приємного перегляду і дай нам Боже гарної і тихої днини!
❤167🤝19😁14🔥7🫡4💋3
Signed Миха Анархист
Мийте ноги - лягайте спать! ;) Бо завтра о 7-00... Оп'ять... Лінійка на Катарсисі! І на цей раз буде надважлива тема - поговоримо про мобілізацію в РФ, думки Полякової та Яблуко і РФ...
❤124😁32🔥16👌12👍8🫡5
Signed Миха Анархист
НОЧНОЙ ЧАТ! ;)
👍89🔥30❤19👏5😁4🙏2🫡1
Signed Миха Анархист
Showing the 12 most recent of 120 posts we hold for @MihaChaplyha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько раз в день, позиционирующая себя грамотной и умной аудитория, посещает для укрепления веры в будущее, в соотечественников и в декларируемые в Чате умные мысли и планы, общественный транспорт с Посполитыми, митинги, очереди и поликлиники?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
АПРИС: Вы достопочтенный димахратиццкий капиталистиццкий житель димахратиццкая капитализЬмы:
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Большевики пабидили патаму ша:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 120 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 287,610 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Миха Анархист Чаплыга” (@MihaChaplyha), 102,011 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MihaChaplyha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.