Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КриптоКабан

@TheCryptoBoar

Not marked by Telegram, checked 10 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

136,673subscribers

-564 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002124928386
TypeChannel
Username@TheCryptoBoar
DescriptionCвязь/сотрудничество/реклама: @bigsur_pepper Наш чат - @chat_kabana11
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TheCryptoBoar

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

136,673137,237136,9557 August 2026 — 137,237 subscribers7 August 2026 — 137,170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 137,061 subscribers9 August 2026 — 136,951 subscribers10 August 2026 — 136,903 subscribers11 August 2026 — 136,760 subscribers12 August 2026 — 136,673 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -564. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136,588–137,322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:15136,673-87
11 Aug 2026, 17:42136,760-143
10 Aug 2026, 17:51136,903-48
9 Aug 2026, 21:21136,951-110
8 Aug 2026, 21:22137,061-109
7 Aug 2026, 21:24137,170-67
7 Aug 2026, 11:48137,237first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,380
Videos
101
Links
651

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,078 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍41219.8%
35617.1%
😁28513.7%
🔥25212.1%
💯22210.7%
🤝1808.66%
👏934.48%
🤯753.61%
😭411.97%
🫡401.92%
🐳251.20%
🌚241.15%
211.01%
🤩130.626%
🍾120.577%
🏆70.337%
🕊60.289%
😡60.289%
🎅40.192%
👾40.192%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,078reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2025 to 24 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 20 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TheCryptoBoar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2025 to 24 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2025, 06:31 UTC≈17,400 views88 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🫡 ETF на DOGE запущен, почти. Немного провтыкал эту новость, но, инфа такая, что ETF Spot Dogecoin от 21Shares УЖЕ появился в списке DTCC (американская корпорация, обрабатывающая почти все сделки на фондовом рынке США). Это уже полноценный запуск а не всякие DOJE (от REX-Osprey) и прочей "мелюзги". 🧐 Почему это важно? Появление в списке DTCC — это финальная стадия перед одобрением SEC, а значит, уже скоро DOGE ста

🔥42👍2219🫡4👏1

19 Sept 2025, 12:31 UTC≈15,000 views107 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗓 Вернемся на 12 лет назад) Интересно, все в этой ветке обсуждения стали долларовыми миллионерами или пустили слюну, когда увидели биток по 100…200…500 долларов?

42😭35🫡19👍6🔥5

19 Sept 2025, 05:45 UTC≈13,400 views57 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐳 Какое нам дело до нереализованной прибыли китов? Нереализованная прибыль ETH у китов среднего размера достигла уровня, который последний раз наблюдался на ATH в ноябре 2021 года. 🤔 Что это значит для рынка? Это говорит о том, что киты среднего размера сидят на значительном бумажном доходе, сопоставимом с их прибылью на последнем пике рынка. 👍 На пальцах: ➡️ Когда у крупных игроков огромная бумажная прибыль — у

👍4011👏51

17 Sept 2025, 15:15 UTC≈9,920 views106 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

👊 Возможно, самая важная новость этого года. Удивительно, но этот инфоповод почти проигнорирован не только большинством Telegram-каналов, но и практически всеми русскоязычными СМИ. 🤔 Что произошло: В Конгрессе США встретились Майкл Сэйлор и Том Ли — законодатели и лидеры криптоиндустрии. Обсуждалось создание стратегического Bitcoin-резерва. Да, именно того самого резерва, о котором 100 раз рассказывал нам Трамп.

🔥57👏2113💯8👍4🐳3

16 Sept 2025, 05:45 UTC≈7,740 views41 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

👀 Что-то все очень поверили в токен от Base. Команда проекта несколько раз открещивалась от запуска токена, но после изменений в политике SEC они уже как будто бы и не против… 🧐 Что произошло? Фаундер Base заявил о возможности выпуска токена во время прямой трансляции. Сроки и какая-либо конкретика озвучены не были. Если вспомнить предыдущие интервью Джесси Поллака, то раньше отказ от запуска токена объясняли тем,

👏20🌚108👍3

15 Sept 2025, 15:19 UTC≈6,880 views96 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

💱 Пару дней назад при переводе не указал мемо-фразу, и вот что получилось: Наибольший процент потерь, связанных с криптой, происходит именно из-за человеческого фактора: забыл/ошибся/не сверил и т.д. 🤔 Зачем мемо? Напомню, что это один из идентификаторов перевода. Некоторые системы и сервисы, к примеру биржи, идентифицируют вас по номеру кошелька, некоторые — по комментарию. Чаще всего идентификация по комментарию

💯3623🤯188🫡5👍4😁2

15 Sept 2025, 10:23 UTC≈6,520 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎬 А тем временем на PumpFun вернулись стримы. Один из соучредителей заявил, что PumpFun как стриминговая платформа уже достигла 1% доли рынка Twitch и 10% доли рынка Kick. Вроде, такой же треш, как и раньше, но токен платформы выдал 2 икса с начала сентября.

😁304🔥1

15 Sept 2025, 05:45 UTC≈7,850 views210 reactions12 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👊 Такс, Кабан на месте. В общем, сначала решил отдохнуть пару дней от написания постов, потом ещё пару дней... Потом улетел в отпуск и долго не мог вернуться обратно из-за проблем с документами. В общем, пока решал все возникшие траблы, не мог изваять какой-то качественный контент, а делать на "отъ***сь", сами понимаете, не лучшая затея. В общем, Кабан на месте и готов продолжать делиться своими мыслями. Обычно пе

🤝120🔥4219👍9😁8🌚4🍾4🏆2

5 Aug 2025, 05:33 UTC≈15,200 views156 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Инфраструктурные проекты всегда занимают лидирующие позиции. Одним из ключевых маркеров того, стоит ли делать ставку на конкретный проект, является наличие развитой инфраструктуры вокруг него. Это не только говорит о стабильности, но и обеспечивает приток разных категорий пользователей — с разными целями, интересами и степенью вовлечённости. ✍️ Примеры? В целом почти всё, что мы видим в крипте — часть нескольких

64🤝36😁25💯14👍6🌚32🐳2

28 Jul 2025, 14:45 UTC≈15,700 views139 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Я же не один заметил, как Илон Маск из супергения, двигающего прогресс вперёд, превратился в.. Я был даже в какой‑то степени фанатом Маска. Да и вообще, наверное, сложно было не быть фанатом — у него получалось буквально всё, к чему он прикасался. И не просто получалось: каждое действие стало прорывом планетарного масштаба — PayPal, SpaceX, Tesla, OpenAI. Помню, когда читал «Биографию Маска», прифигел: он не только

💯7919👍13😁8👏6🫡53🌚2

28 Jul 2025, 05:45 UTC≈15,100 views116 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤓 Сэм Альтман про ИИ: Глава OpenAI, поделился рядом смелых предсказаний о будущем ИИ и человеческого общества, ключевая выжимка: ➡️ Колледжи уйдут в прошлое Образование в привычном формате станет ненужным для поколения, которое только появляется на свет. ➡️ ИИ заменит значительную часть офисной работы Будущие модели будут мыслить, кодировать, договариваться и планировать быстрее людей, это затронет множество про

🤯43👍3317🤝7😁6🐳5🎅2🍾1

22 Jul 2025, 12:34 UTC≈14,100 views130 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

👊 Биток по $7к все еще доступен) Давненько я Ripple не обозревал, да и сложно что-то добавить, когда и так уже все шикарно, но все-же найду: 📊 Что по чем? Сейчас капитализация превышает $207 млрд. Это третий показатель на рынке — практически столько же, сколько совокупная капа BNB + SOL вместе взятых. Учитывая, что в DeFi заблокировано около $92 млрд (44 %), текущий баланс между «спекулятивной» и «фундаментальной»

👍7526🔥13💯6😁4🤝2🤩2🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TheCryptoBoar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 163,134 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HOT DROPS 🎁
@drops_on_hot · 907,842
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
Alex_MVP
@playweb4 · 149,336
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto Medwed
@cryptomedwed · 150,136
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
zicelaqo
@zicelaqo · 172,396
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Типичный Инвестор
@eduardinvest · 1,473,827
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 August 2026
Not Fans
@notforfans · 151,509
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Not a Trader
@notatraderrr · 145,859
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КриптоКабан” (@TheCryptoBoar), 136,673 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TheCryptoBoar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.