👇 Детальный видео-разбор моих стратегий раннего инвестирования для кратного роста капитала - https://t.me/ehodchenkov_tg_bot?start=link_BEa8HykuRH
Инвестор-практик с 2007 года.
Основатель "Лиги Инвесторов».
Мой личный ВК https://vk.com/e_hodchenkov
Created
13 June 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,441–53,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:44
53,455
-17
11 Aug 2026, 21:02
53,472
-8
10 Aug 2026, 20:35
53,480
-19
9 Aug 2026, 17:53
53,499
-12
8 Aug 2026, 17:32
53,511
-15
7 Aug 2026, 17:03
53,526
-8
6 Aug 2026, 17:11
53,534
-12
6 Aug 2026, 01:45
53,546
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:11
53,546
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.24%
avg views ÷ 53,455 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,340
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
22 (24 June 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
33,370
Reactions total
1,409
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,470
Videos
≈227
Links
≈1,780
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 03s
Average length
1m 41s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,115 reactions across 22 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,345
43.2%
👍
731
23.5%
❤
423
13.6%
😁
199
6.39%
🤔
80
2.57%
💯
79
2.54%
👀
56
1.80%
😢
49
1.57%
⚡
45
1.44%
👏
34
1.09%
🕊
25
0.803%
🤝
12
0.385%
👌
11
0.353%
🙏
11
0.353%
🏆
7
0.225%
🐳
5
0.161%
😎
3
0.096%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 22 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hodchenkov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Самый сложный маршрут - внутри
За годы работы фонда «Все Все Вместе» я понял, что операция, получение протеза и реабилитация - это не финальная точка. Это только начало возвращения человека к полноценной жизни.
Врачи и ученые сейчас делают невероятное: люди получают фантастические протезы, комфортные, точные, технологичные. Реабилитологи учат заново освоить свое тело.
Но после выписки из больницы человек остается…
ИИ уже управляет человечеством, но не так, как вы подумали 😀
В Канаде робот занял тело парламентария политик прямо на заседании парламента зачитал речь вместе с техническими комментариями от ИИ.
Произнося что-то вроде "вот новый вариант законодательной речи без коротких пунктов" он даже не запнулся. Да и в зале никакого возмущения не возникло.
Получается, на заседании присутствовала только нейронка, а депутат пора…
«АКТИВЫ» СТАНОВЯТСЯ МОИМ ЛИЧНЫМ БЛОГОМ
Друзья, этому каналу уже десять лет. Все это время я писал здесь в основном про финансы и инвестиции.
Сейчас я хочу поменять направление канала, потому что за последние годы сильно изменился сам.
Как минимум на ближайший 1-2 месяца сделаю «Активы» личным блогом предпринимателя, который проходит самый крупный кризис в жизни. Поверьте, мне есть чем поделиться.
Я расскажу, поче…
Как сломались инвестиции в недвижимость - наглядно
Модель «работаю, беру ипотеку, покупаю квартиру» окончательно сломалась. Разрыв между доходом и уровнем ежемесячного платежа в нашей стране рекордный. На рынок можно зайти только с уже накопленным немаленьким капиталом.
Из-за этого имущественный разрыв растет, владельцы недвижимости получают дорожающий актив, а остальные одновременно платят аренду, копят и пытаются…
Крипта есть? А если найду 😀
Ну что, криптаны, теперь у нас с вами больше определенности и обязательств.
Госдума приняла закон о регулировании крипторынка, вчера его уже одобрил Совфед. Главное:
✅ закон вступает в силу с 1 сентября 2026 года, участникам рынка дадут переходный период до 1 июля 2027 года;
✅ криптовалюты признают валютными ценностями;
✅ покупать и продавать монеты можно будет через регулируемых пос…
Ставку, конечно, снизили. Но декоративно - до 14%.
Важнее, что прогноз по дальнейшему снижению повысили. Быстро от инфляции не отделаемся, экономика будет "болеть" еще пару-тройку лет.
Война - это мир...
Goldman Sachs обновил свой график геополитических рисков. Он зависит от интенсивности конфликтов, санкций, угроз.
Сейчас этот график находится у исторического максимума.
Но это не главная новость, это мы уже слышали.
Goldman Sachs обращает внимание на важную деталь: отдельная война или политический кризис обычно наносят мировой экономике резкий, но короткий удар.
Но сейчас конфликты превращают…
🎧 Зачем я еду в Тибет этой осенью?
Записал, пожалуй, самый личный подкаст в этом году.
Еще и посреди рабочей недели :)
Если читали мой пост про «личный шторм», то знаете: последние три года меня штормит на всех уровнях.
В подкасте рассказываю, куда меня этот шторм в итоге привёл.
Спойлер: в сентябре 2026 я иду Кору вокруг Кайласа /Тибеот/. 52 километра пешком вокруг горы, на которую никто никогда не поднимался.
…
Индекс "бабушек у подъезда" - тест для технологии
Видели новую рекламу ChatGPT?
В ней нет цифр, которые сказали бы нам про мощность, скорость и интеллект новой модели. И даже нет демонстрации вау-возможностей вроде создания реалистичных видео за один промпт и шустрых агентов.
Зато в рекламе есть бабушки.
Три дамы 80+, которые общаются с нейронкой, как с обычным собеседником, обсуждают поездку в Санторини, перевод…
А у вас в портфеле есть декакорн?
Помните, я рассказывал, что инвестирую в технологические компании до IPO?
Мы собрали несколько Индексов, в которые вошли более 30 крупных проектов из сферы ИИ, кибербезопасности, блокчейна.
Еще один единорог из этой стратегии порадовал:
8 июля наша портфельная компания SambaNova объявила о первом закрытии раунда Series F на $1 млрд по оценке $11 млрд.
Теперь это не единорог, а д…
«Найдёшь Своих — найдёшь Своё. Найдёшь Своё — найдёшь Себя».
Вернулся из самого удивительного семейного лагеря и наконец познакомился с Шалвой Александровичем.
Мзианети - семейный мини-город в горах Грузии, в котором на 10 дней дети становятся взрослыми: выбирают мэра, парламент, ходят на работу в 16 учреждений (моя старшая в этом году работала на телевидении) и деньги/инфляци/налони, а значит и власть, есть тольк…
Мое время и знания уйдут с аукциона. Вы можете забрать его (и стать благотворителем)
Скажите, что может заставить предпринимателя, который уже 25 лет не работаю в найме, выставить на торги свое время и компетентность?
😀 Если бы не благотворительный фонд "Все Все Вместе", я бы на такое не решился.
Но теперь у вас есть возможность буквально нанять меня на стратегическую сессию, чтобы разобрать ваш проект, подсветит…
❤38👍31🔥17👏3🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @hodchenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 231,778 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бизнес Подкасты @business_podcast · 172,790 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Активы / Е. Ходченков/” (@hodchenkov), 53,455 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hodchenkov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.