Your AI Powered Degen Terminal
Imagine the power of Bloomberg Terminal and the intelligence of ChatGPT combined to illuminate the on-chain world
W: https://moonberg.com/
X: https://x.com/moonberg
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2,078. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 311,160–313,862 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 22:42
311,472
-602
10 Aug 2026, 19:15
312,074
-654
9 Aug 2026, 15:21
312,728
-349
8 Aug 2026, 13:31
313,077
-473
7 Aug 2026, 13:15
313,550
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 11 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.53%
avg views ÷ 311,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,780
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
22 (11 March 2025 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
23,880
Reactions total
282
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
64
Videos
1
Links
42
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,672 reactions across 22 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,847
32.6%
👍
1,401
24.7%
🔥
1,323
23.3%
🤪
354
6.24%
😁
291
5.13%
🌚
93
1.64%
👏
78
1.38%
🙊
55
0.97%
🥰
52
0.917%
👻
47
0.829%
💊
29
0.511%
👀
27
0.476%
🤯
18
0.317%
😱
17
0.3%
🐳
9
0.159%
🕊
8
0.141%
🫡
7
0.123%
💋
6
0.106%
🆒
3
0.053%
🤝
3
0.053%
2 further kinds
4
0.071%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,672reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 11 March 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 THE $MBX TOKEN SALE IS LIVE
Stage 1 is open at $0.25. The price steps up as each stage fills.
The terminal is live, the agent reads the chain, and Moonscope
called 962 tokens in the last 30 days at a 77.7% hit rate.
Now the token that whole economy runs on is open to everyone.
👉 www.moonberg.com
How to buy
1. Connect your wallet, or sign in with email, Google or X.
2. Pick your currency: ETH, SOL, BNB, USDT or …
The $MBX token sale goes live today at
1PM EST / 7PM CET.
Two hours before it opens, Oz is live on 𝕏
answering your questions about the sale.
Drop your questions in the live chat during the
stream and jackgk will pull them up live.
https://x.com/moonberg/status/2087181964067455282?s=20
The market isn't short on data. It's drowning in it.
Millions of data points a second, and most of it is noise that just makes you more confident about being wrong.
The edge was never more data. It's the one signal hidden inside it.
That's the whole job of the terminal: noise in, signal out.
https://x.com/moonberg/status/2077420212031193098?s=20
While we weren't posting, six engineers shipped on 60 days, over 300 commits. Even the founder is in the code, not in the deck.
What we were building, heads down:
→ An AI that understands the blockchain.
→ An agent that understands you, personally.
→ Institutional-grade data, open to everyone.
MVP is now available. Updates ship daily.
In crypto, going quiet can read as trouble and to others it can read as grinding.…
We will be giving early access to a few of the OGs. If you really want access please comment with why.
https://x.com/moonberg/status/1985750832130752895
1 - We set a record, 15% mindshare without spending a single dollar.
2 - We’ve reimagined what a trading terminal can be.
3 - We called winners and losers for 3 weeks straight with our data.
And yeah… we hear you.
"The terminal looks insane, but it’s still missing some things."
That’s why we’re dropping MegaDrop points to reward those already trading while things are added.
But here’s the real question you shoul…
❤196🔥93👏31🤪30💊19🌚17😁15🐳7
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @moonbergai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 841,794 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Crypto TV India (Crypto Asad) @CryptoTvIndia · 31,343#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DRFT Party Announcement @drft_party · 157,372 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
CallFluent Community @callfluentai · 577,111 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
W3BFLIX Official @w3bflix · 766,865 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
BYIN Channel @byin_fun · 581,025 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
Tabi Announcement @tabi_ann · 2,097,431 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 August 2026
Ice Open Network @iceblockchain · 1,326,281 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 August 2026
🏅OLYCoin Community @olycoin_official · 341,332 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
DuckChain Announcement @DuckChainAnn · 4,087,980 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Sauces Community @sauces_world · 471,277 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
SecondLive_Ton News @SL_TonNews · 149,799 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MOONBERG” (@moonbergai), 311,472 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moonbergai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.