Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +469. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 534,393–535,002 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:33
534,932
+44
11 Aug 2026, 11:18
534,888
+77
10 Aug 2026, 10:51
534,811
+95
9 Aug 2026, 11:11
534,716
+133
8 Aug 2026, 11:29
534,583
+85
7 Aug 2026, 12:18
534,498
+35
7 Aug 2026, 07:32
534,463
first reading
Engagement
31 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 534,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
98,900
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
31 (18 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
3,064,700
Reactions total
56,106
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,220
Videos
≈1,430
Links
≈1,990
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 16m
Average length
4m 01s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
56,106 reactions across 31 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
24,663
44.0%
❤
22,718
40.5%
🔥
4,644
8.28%
💯
1,012
1.80%
👏
626
1.12%
🥰
573
1.02%
🎉
315
0.561%
😁
261
0.465%
👀
247
0.44%
🤔
175
0.312%
🤣
164
0.292%
✍
148
0.264%
👌
138
0.246%
😍
100
0.178%
🤨
79
0.141%
🤩
71
0.127%
🙏
59
0.105%
😐
36
0.064%
🕊
31
0.055%
🍌
24
0.043%
1 further kind
22
0.039%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 31 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @min2ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья! У меня на канале НИГДЕ не было заявлено, что я готовлю для диабетиков. Нигде и никогда! К чему эти комментарии?
НО хочу ответить (хоть и написано это не под моим рецептом, а под рецептом из комментариев!)
👇👇👇
Во-первых, у меня ооочень много блюд, которых подходят даже диабетикам.
Во-вторых, я во многих своих видео говорю и текстом иногда прописываю, чем можно заменить сахар, белый рис, крахмалы и пшеничную…
Пирог с рыбными консервами очень простой: обычное дрожжевое тесто, на воде (хотя и со сдобным тоже можно, получается весьма интересный вкус). Я делаю самое быстрое тесто, точно так же, как делали бабушка и мама: на 3 стакана муки 1 стакан теплой воды, 3 столовых ложки сахара, чайная ложка соли, 1 ч.л. сухих дрожжей с горкой. И растительное масло- сколько возьмет мука. Недолго вымешиваю, оставляю подойти в тепле около…
Если спросить у Сёмы, какое его любимое блюдо, он скажет, не задумываясь: «Папин плов!».
Это самый обычный плов. Плов как плов. Но… «никто вкуснее папы плов не готовит» ❤️
А я на всю жизнь запомнила бабушкин борщ. Она варила его обычно в маааленькой кастрюльке на две-три порции. И даже не варила, а медленно томила на самом краешке печи. И готовился этот борщ с раннего утра до самого обеда. КАК ЖЕ БЫЛО ВКУСНО! У мен…
Мне срочно нужен торт
Только что вернулась из магазина с коржами для торта (потому что печь что-то сейчас жарко) и с банкой сгущёнки для крема. Срочно готовлю ТОРТ!
Вот этот 👆
Вдруг кому-то тоже надо
• Вафельные коржи - 1 упаковка (8 шт.)
• Молоко сгущённое (варёное) - 1 банка
• Масло сливочное - 150 г
• Сметана - 2 ст.л.
• Арахис (у меня солёный)
Если здесь не воспроизводятся видео, смотрите в MAX 👉 https://max…
Каждый раз зимой, открывая баночку, хвалю себя за то, что закрыла много!
Икра из баклажанов на зиму (вернее, "лучшaя икра из баклажанов")
Даже настаиваю - попробуйте. За лето готовлю раз 20 (просто на ужин) и на зиму заготавливаю всегда тоже много. Один раз попробуете и поймёте, "куда столько" 😉
• Баклажаны - 2 кг
• Перец сладкий - 400 г
• Лук - 800-900 г
• Масло растительное - 140-150 мл
• Томатная паста - 100 г …
Тaк готовит моя тётя в Одессе. Она называет это блюдо "Икра из синеньких"
Я теперь овощи для икры тоже не жарю, соединяю свежие и запечённые. Как же это вкусно!
ИКРА ИЗ БАКЛАЖАНОВ
• Баклажаны – 1 кг
• Перец сладкий – 400 г
• Помидоры – 500 г
• Лук – 1 шт.
• Чеснок – 1 зуб.
• Кинза
• Масло растительное – 70-80 мл
• Соль
Если здесь не воспроизводятся видео, смотрите в MAX 👉 https://max.ru/min2ru
КУХНЯ НАИЗНАНКУ - …
Важно!
Никаких денежных призов я никому не раздаю! Не переходите ни по каким ссылкам, если вам кто-то (даже с моим фото на аватарке) обещает деньги и пишет "какжевамповезловывыиграли". Это не я!!! Это мошенники! Они заберут у вас всё! Проверяйте, перепроверяйте и снова проверяйте, если вам кто-то предлагает деньги и если просит у вас номер карты или любые другие ваши личные данные! Лучше спросите, переспросите, ещё …
Лето. Август. Жара. Пятница. Вечер. Новый год!
Да-да, самый настоящий!
Была и ёлка, и Дед Мороз, и «Оливье», и «Селёдка под шубой», и утка с яблоками, и бой Курантов, и записочки с желаниями... Всё было по-настоящему.
А кааак всё было вкусно! Утка!.. Это не забыть! Нежнейшее мясо, сочное, ароматное! Ммм... Теперь прошу Алесю поделиться рецептом этого секретного маринада (она его пока скрывает, как и секрет своего …
Совсем забыла об этом рецепте. Но сейчас же самое время готовить это ЯБЛОЧНОЕ ПЕЧЕНЬЕ! Спасибо, что в комментариях напоминаете!
Это вкусно! Это просто! Нежное, внутри влажное, кисло-сладенькое и очень ароматное! Попробуйте обязательно! Полчаса - и можно пить чай!
• Яблоки (среднего размера, лучше покислее) - 2 шт.
• Мука - 350 г
• Яйца - 3 шт.
• Сахар - 4 ст.л.
• Сливочное масло - 150 г
• Корица - 0,5 ч.л.
• Разрых…
5 РЕЦЕПТОВ для всех фанатов ОЛИВЬЕ
Если вы сейчас мне напишете, что это видео не совсем вовремя, я с вами соглашусь, но…
Я как раз сейчас ем Оливье! Потому что захотелось 😉
Не кабачковой икры захотелось, не запечённых баклажанов. И даже не моего любимого салата из помидоров! Захотелось ОЛИВЬЕ! В августе! Оливье! И селёдки! Селёдки под шубой!
— 1 — Салат "Вместо Оливье"
• Куриная грудка - 1 шт.
• Грибы - 200 г
• …
Вчера был прекрасный вечер! Я встречалась с подружкой, с которой мы знакомы уже очень-очень много лет (это 👆яблоки из её сада). Сейчас между нами почти 1500 километров, но это совсем не расстояние для нас!
Мы не виделись год, но... как будто и не расставались вовсе, как будто только вчера сидели вместе и болтали обо всём на свете!
Как же здорово, что есть друзья! И что сегодня есть возможность встречаться, несмотря…
👍1,520❤918🥰58💯48😍48🍌24
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @min2ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 56,841 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Nani_life @nani_life2 · 174,085 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
Irina_kuznecova18 @Irina_kuznecova18 · 158,217 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
ired.cap @ired_cap · 160,201 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
Дачные советы 🏡 @sovet_dom · 208,899 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кухня наизнанку” (@min2ru), 534,932 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/min2ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.