Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net +2,086. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 534,150–536,862 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 07:41
536,549
+363
19 Sept 2026, 00:41
536,186
+97
16 Sept 2026, 13:19
536,089
-15
14 Sept 2026, 17:17
536,104
+25
13 Sept 2026, 03:36
536,079
+17
11 Sept 2026, 06:57
536,062
+42
8 Sept 2026, 08:17
536,020
+87
5 Sept 2026, 03:42
535,933
+16
3 Sept 2026, 06:24
535,917
-30
2 Sept 2026, 03:52
535,947
-15
1 Sept 2026, 00:38
535,962
-22
30 Aug 2026, 22:26
535,984
+36
29 Aug 2026, 21:57
535,948
+1
28 Aug 2026, 18:25
535,947
+37
27 Aug 2026, 21:04
535,910
+3
26 Aug 2026, 18:58
535,907
+57
25 Aug 2026, 20:12
535,850
+46
24 Aug 2026, 20:29
535,804
+105
23 Aug 2026, 04:15
535,699
+28
21 Aug 2026, 14:48
535,671
first reading
Engagement
89 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 536,549 subscribers
Avg views / post
80,700
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 89 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
89 (18 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
2,987,000
Reactions total
63,050
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,250
Videos
≈1,470
Links
≈2,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 08m
Average length
3m 22s
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
159,736 reactions across 89 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
68,225
42.7%
👍
65,864
41.2%
🔥
14,899
9.33%
💯
2,584
1.62%
👏
2,308
1.44%
🥰
1,081
0.677%
😁
734
0.46%
🤣
715
0.448%
✍
537
0.336%
🙏
424
0.265%
🎉
379
0.237%
🤔
359
0.225%
👌
348
0.218%
👀
320
0.2%
😍
246
0.154%
🤨
222
0.139%
😢
158
0.099%
🤩
92
0.058%
😐
71
0.044%
😘
59
0.037%
3 further kinds
111
0.069%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159,736 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
77
across the posts below
Posts paid on
40
of 89 we hold a reading for · 45%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @min2ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 89 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
МАМА СКАЗАЛА, что это очень простой рецепт! Показываю! Вот почему его стоит сохранить! ПЕРЕЦ НА ЗИМУ
Перец, фаршированный баклажанами, НА ЗИМУ. Это и закуска, и гарнир, и полноценный ужин.
Первый способ (стерилизация в автоклаве):
• Перец сладкий ~ 3,5 кг
Для начинки:
• Баклажаны ~ 3 кг
• Лук ~ 1 кг
• Масло растительное 200 мл (150 - для обжаривания баклажанов, 50 - для обжаривания лука)
Для маринада:
• Томатный со…
Сырники «Солнечные»
Осень! Самое время для этого блюда. Яркие и очень вкусные сырники с тыквой. Хоть на завтрак, хоть на ужин! Попробуйте.
Можно обжарить такие сырнички на сковороде на топлёном (или обычном сливочном) масле. Можно запечь в духовке при 180 градусах минут 15-20 (смотрю по готовности!). Или можно приготовить в аэрогриле, что я сегодня и сделала.
Любой аэрогриль подойдёт! Так же, как и любая духовка и…
Эта неделя у меня началась как-то не так... Но вчера я встретилась с подругой. И... вернулась домой совсем с другим настроением 😊
И я подумала
Нужно чаще встречаться с друзьями. Не нужно откладывать на «как-нибудь потом». Не нужно ждать, когда станет меньше дел и меньше забот. Их меньше почему-то не становится.
А время летит так быстро… Иногда кажется: да мы же совсем недавно виделись! А потом понимаешь, что прошл…
Если вы не любите тыкву, значит, ещё не пробовали этот рецепт. Такую тыкву любит даже мой сын, при том, что другие "тыквенные" рецепты он не воспринимает совсем!
Тыква в сметанном соусе
Очень необычно и очень вкусно. Готовится быстро и просто. Получается нежное, пикантное и ароматное блюдо.
Вначале готовлю соус. Для этого сметану смешиваю с измельчённой зеленью и чесноком. Добавляю чёрный перец и паприку, перемеши…
Я недавно показывала, как готовлю начинку из цитрусовых для пирогов. В составе измельчённый лимон, апельсин, сахар и манка. Видела комментарий с просьбой повторить рецепт пирога с такой начинкой.
Да! Он очень вкусный! Очень! И готовить его просто. Рецепт этого теста я записала, когда мне было 15 лет. Бабушка готовила такой пирог с яблочным повидлом (и там было два слоя). Но мне вот так, с таким цитрусовым "кремом" п…
Когда заготовки делать не хочется, а блинчиков с джемом хочется... готовлю быстрый джем. Пока пекутся блинчики, джем готов!
Вкусный яблочный джем
Можно готовиь без сахара, но тогда лимонный сок не добавляю. Джем кисленький получается. Можно вместо сахара взять аллюлозу или другой заменитель сахара.
Можно к яблочку добавить грушу - так будет ещё вкуснее. Для однородности можно блендером пробить. Но мы ТАК едим.
Мо…
Яблочная стружка для пирогов, рулетов и пирожков на зиму
В видео постаралась ответить на все вопросы. Посмотрите, пожалуйста, ролик до конца. Там ДВА варианта, как можно заготовить яблочную стружку на зиму - в автоклаве и без него.
Автоклав ЛЮБОЙ подойдёт. Ничего рекомендовать и ссылку оставлять не буду, потому что не разбираюсь я в них. Тут у меня крышки для автоклавирования - они чуть толще, чем обычные (мне так …
Спасибо за ваши отзывы! Столько было комментариев с недоверием к этому рецепту, что я даже немного расстроилась. Мне было жаль, что вы не узнаете, насколько это вкусное сочетание - обжаренные баклажаны, грибы и картофель, отваренный в молоке...
Но вы поверили! И приготовили! Я счастлива! СПАСИБО!
Вот тут был рецепт https://t.me/min2ru/7416
На завтрак - блинчики!
Тонкие блинчики на молоке. Вкусные и нежные. Идеальны для начинок! Не рвутся! Тесто может показаться немного жидковатым, но не добавляйте муку. Готовьте по рецепту. Всё получится!
Давно я такие блинчики не готовила, но сегодня у меня вдруг резко закончилась мука. На любимые "Бархатные" бы не хватило. И я вспомнила, что можно часть муки заменить крахмалом!
Сёма сказал, что они тоже очень вкус…
Я не ожидала даже!
Очень много вот таких 👆 комментариев под рецептом солёных баклажанов, который я опубликовала вчера. Очень многие, оказывается, потеряли и давно искали этот рецепт. А у меня он, оказывается, был!
Но я бы и не вспомнила о нём, если бы не вы. Если бы не наша рубрика "Бабушка не записала", я бы, наверное, не сняла это видео. Спасибо за ваши воспоминания!
И отдельное, огромное СПАСИБО каждому из вас …
Баклажаны КАК РАНЬШЕ
Старый мамин рецепт. Солёные (или квашеные) баклажаны. Ничего не меняйте - вкусно, как в детстве!
На 10 баклажанов (это ~ 2 кг) беру 80-100 г чеснока
Рассол:
• Вода - 1 л
• Соль - 70 г
• Перец чёрный горошком - 8-10 шт.
• Перец душистый - 3-4 шт.
• Лавровый лист - 1-2 шт.
Соль для варки баклажанов «на яйцо, на 2 копейки». Я взвесила - это ~ 110 г на 1 литр воды
Если здесь не воспроизводятся в…
👍1,150❤341🔥154🤣17👏16🙏15
Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @min2ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@min2ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 September 2026
Most recent edit
13 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Метод Мироневич. Из XXXL в S @marymironevich · 24,705 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 15 September 2026
oliv'едка | дом·уют·рецепты 🤍 @olivedka · 28,207 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
Alina FooDee🍴Рецепты🧅 @AlinaFooDee · 29,819 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 September 2026
Сейчас Приготовим! @seichasprigotovim · 31,752 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
Цветкова Наталья @Tsvetkova_Natalia · 35,212 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 2 September 2026
Рецепты в гостях у Вани @KasIvan · 35,953 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Дина, Коллекция Рецептов @dinarecipes · 36,280 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 1 September 2026
Кухня наизнанку - ЗАГОТОВКИ @bankanaiznanku · 39,890 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
БАНК ПОВАРОВ @bankpovarov · 51,023 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
Кухня с Акцентом @zuriskitchen · 56,992 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
Кухня наизнанку - ПОСТНЫЕ @postnaiznanku · 80,358 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
Кулинарим с Таней 🌸 ЛУЧШИЕ РЕЦЕПТЫ🌿 @kulinarimstanej · 86,034 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
KALNINA NATALIA @nkalnina · 109,383 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 14 August 2026
Nechetoff | Лайфхаки @nechetoff · 146,899 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
Зона Лазерсона @lazerzona · 81,728 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Дарья Черненко | Меню недели 🍏 | Кулинарная школа @Dasha_Chernenko · 92,239 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
ЛЕНИВЫЙ КУЛИНАР @leniviy_kulinar @kulinar_leniviy · 124,250 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Шеф Онлайн @bistrierecepty · 41,232 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
Nani_life @nani_life2 · 170,925 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026
Валерий Пономарь | Рецепты @ponomar_valeriy · 23,807 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 17 September 2026
Шеф-повар Василий Емельяненко / Рецепты @chefvasiliy · 47,710 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
Рецепты с фото | Аймкук 👩🏻🍳 @iamcook · 83,735 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
Resto_ray | Рецепты от шефа @resto_ray · 96,612 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
@liliya_foodbloger @liliya_foodblogger · 27,845 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
3 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кухня наизнанку” (@min2ru), 536,549 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/min2ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.