https://github.com/luckyzyx/LuckyTool LuckyTool目前已重新开源并且使用GPL 3.0许可证
❤242👍54😱12🔥10🥰9🤣2

Channel
@LuckyTool
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,026subscribers
+220 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001754519712 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LuckyTool |
| Description | 禁止引流、搬运、转载、售卖、分享、分流 频道已关联讨论群,点击关联群组即可跳转 加入讨论群后才可以在频道信息中进行评论 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LuckyTool |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 27,026 | +35 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 26,991 | +52 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 26,939 | +52 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 26,887 | +28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 26,859 | +33 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 26,826 | +20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 26,806 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 January 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 82,400 |
| Reactions total | 1,076 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,629 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,002 | 27.6% | |
| 😱 | 966 | 26.6% | |
| 😭 | 537 | 14.8% | |
| 👍 | 420 | 11.6% | |
| 😡 | 198 | 5.46% | |
| 🥰 | 132 | 3.64% | |
| 😁 | 95 | 2.62% | |
| 🤣 | 53 | 1.46% | |
| 👏 | 51 | 1.41% | |
| 🫡 | 38 | 1.05% | |
| 🤔 | 28 | 0.772% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 0.716% | |
| 💔 | 15 | 0.413% | |
| 👻 | 10 | 0.276% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 0.276% | |
| 😨 | 10 | 0.276% | |
| 🌚 | 8 | 0.22% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 0.165% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.11% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 0.11% | |
| 8 further kinds | 16 | 0.441% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,629reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LuckyTool. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 January 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://github.com/luckyzyx/LuckyTool LuckyTool目前已重新开源并且使用GPL 3.0许可证
❤242👍54😱12🔥10🥰9🤣2
后续 ColorOS 主流设备无法解锁 Root 的时候,说明 LT 该休息了 ()
😭418🫡30😱18👍7❤6😁4👏2🎉1
一加调整国行 BootLoader 解锁深度测试规则: 搭载 ColorOS 16 及以上版本的机型、升级至 ColorOS 17 及以上版本的机型,可通过官方通道申请加入深度测试计划。未满足上述条件的 ColorOS 版本机型, Bootloader 解锁不受影响。 已支持深度测试的机型将于 9 月优先采用该政策;搭载或升级至 ColorOS 17 及以上版本的机型将结合新机发布、ColorOS 17 正式版推送节奏分批纳入。 已支持深度测试的机型:将于 9 月首次开放名额,次月开始每月 1 日释放名额 搭载 ColorOS 17 及以上版本的机型:将于新机发布会满一个月后首次开放名额,次月开始每月 1 日释放名额 升级至 ColorOS 17 及以上版本的机型:将于正式版推送满一个月后首次开放名额,次月开始每月 1 日释放名额
😡136❤15😁9👻4👍3🍾2😭1
一加深度测试调整公告&QA(2026年7月24号更新) https://bbs.oneplus.com/thread/2175833961601695750
😭41😁7👍4❤3🌚2🤔1
v2.1.1 新增 - 最低支持版本提升至 Android 9(API 28) - 高级隐藏功能现可支持 A12+ - 允许一键清空已选作用域 改进 - 优化安全模式对 System UI 的检测阈值 - 恢复管理器中的模块数量徽标 - 改进错误报告发送流程 修复 - 修复部分情况下无法启动守护进程的问题 - 修复 XposedHelpers.findField API 行为 - 修复 Android 17 下服务连接接口不兼容的问题 - 修复模块详情页弹出菜单显示层级异常的问题 - 修复 Markdown 样式在部分页面中显示异常的问题 Added - Raised the minimum supported version to Android 9 (API 28) - Advanced hiding is now supported on Android 12 and above - Added an option …
👏27❤3👍2
Photo, posted without a caption
😱266🤣49😨10❤7🌚3👍2🤪2🤯2
v2.1.0 新增 实现 libxposed API 102 适配 Android 17 QPR1 Beta 4 维护 原计划 2.1.0 废弃 New XSharedPreferences 推迟到 2.2.0,强烈建议 legacy 模块尽快迁移到 libxposed 今后可向 report@bug.lsposed.org 发送反馈邮件 改进 大幅提升被 hook 方法的性能 优化还原内联钩子逻辑 优化 dex 优化器包装的挂载逻辑 优化一系列的 UI 体验 修复 修复 XposedBridge.unhookMethod 行为异常 修复了一个全局检测点 修复 TalkBack 重复朗读、未朗读勾选状态等无障碍问题 Added Implemented libxposed API 102 Adapted for Android 17 QPR1 Beta 4 Maintaince Postponed the planned…
👍55❤10😢2😁1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤204👍24👏14😭14🫡8🐳4😡4👻2
Changes since latest release: Added - Provided high-speed CDN for the module repository. If you dislike ads, please switch to backup CDN in settings - Added SystemUI safe mode Improved - Enhanced hook compatibility and performance - Improved homepage device name recognition Fixed - Fixed Android 17 QPR1 Beta 3 crash issues - Fixed a series of M3E theme-related issues - Fixed Markdown WebView reload handling issues …
🥰36❤18
v2.0.3 released: Major Behavioral Changes - Legacy modules are no longer allowed to call libxposed API; modules with targetApiVersion ≥ 102 will not be allowed to call legacy API; 101 modules are unaffected New Features - Introduced Material 3 Expressive style manager - Enhanced theme-related settings to support dynamic color schemes and dark mode, and improved the display of cards, menus, bottom navigation, and dia…
👍41❤15
LuckyTool 1.3.4 其他链接 (Other Links) 禁止引流、搬运、转载、售卖、分享、分流 [模块文档 ModuleDoc] https://luckyzyx.gitlab.io/LuckyTool_Doc [反馈流程 FeedbackProcess] https://luckyzyx.gitlab.io/LuckyTool_Doc/check_problem [下载方式 DownloadLink] https://luckyzyx.gitlab.io/LuckyTool_Doc/use/download_link [捐赠方式 Donate] https://luckyzyx.gitlab.io/LuckyTool_Doc/donate [捐赠方式 腾讯文档] https://docs.qq.com/doc/DS2ZDZlNIeUlpdlV1 更新日志 (ChangeLog) [修复] 模块内置检测更新异…
❤198👍24👏6🥰6😱2
Changes since last release: Added Enabled dynamic blur based on device state (e.g. power saving mode, performance class) Added collapsing for long module descriptions Added tapjacking mitigation toggle and hint Hid the "install to other user" option when the module is already installed Improved Reduced per-method callback count to limit crash propagation caused by faulty modules Ensured Xposed service is re-delivere…
❤47🥰5😁2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @LuckyTool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 526,542 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LuckyTool” (@LuckyTool), 27,026 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LuckyTool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.