8 Mar 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,150 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
世界上只有三种人，一种是在血汗工厂上班的人，一种是开血汗工厂的人，还有求血汗工厂而不可得的人。
❤2
Channel
剧终的碎碎念
@juzhossn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
993subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001314130822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juzhossn |
| Created | 7 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juzhossn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 993 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:10 | 994 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 993 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 993 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 37.8% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 25.6% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 12.2% | |
| 😇 | 7 | 7.78% | |
| 💔 | 5 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2024 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
23 Feb 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 6 August 2026
贾旭明今年的小品《圆桌捂事》故事结构以及尺度都和14年开心麻花的《同学会》十分相似，叙事逻辑顺畅性以及演技上更是不及，就这还铺天盖地的说着“太敢说了”。 aoe的喊打击贪官口号，在中国是一件非常政治正确的事，只有你或明或暗的指出某个官员才会带来麻烦。
16 Feb 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,550 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
我不喜欢发节日祝福，因为我从来不认为某个日子有特殊的意义，如果有那也仅仅是假期与工作日的区别。 不论是复制粘贴一句“xx快乐”还是不知道从哪里复制来的一段祝福文案，所有这些都让我感到厌烦。 我甚至认为这样密集的所谓祝福，对接受者来说是一种负担。
❤10👍2💔2😁2
25 Jan 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,800 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
体验了4天终末地，即将推进完供能高地，游戏的核心问题是琐碎内容过分干扰正常的游戏流程。 你的目标是完成主线任务一，在这个过程中会有大量的零散奖励，大多需要完成一个不算太难小任务，不知不觉间就偏离了路线。 在任务的必经之路上要求你从十万八千里外拉一根电线来、交给你一个前置任务让你先完成，强制打断你的任务流程。 在此基础上强制的胎教级引导、来回对话、杂乱的养成系统以及一个需要时间熟悉的工厂系统极其容易使玩家信息过载。
❤4💔3
12 Jan 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,480 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
2年过去了，原本的美津浓 horizon 伴随着我跑了至少2500公里(有一部分没有进行记录)已成战损版。 原本的推荐都断码了，再次求推荐，预算为500-700，体重70-75kg，其他需求不变。
6 Jan 2026, 02:15 UTC≈1,220 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
一想之美下的虚拟主播 B站一直以来给我推荐虚拟主播，但我不觉得有趣，也就谈不上了解。甚至无法理解，我的朋友对我说虚拟主播和其他主播没什么区别。 直到一首由虚拟主播翻唱的歌曲打动了我，我觉得这首歌超越了原唱，我迫不及待的听了他其他的翻唱，由此开始了解这个圈子。 看了几场直播后，我感到直播间的氛围有一点诡异，但又说不上来。因此我并未融入这个圈子，而是以一个观察者静静看着这一切。 直到我看到了虚拟主播演唱会的直播，那氛围让我恍然大悟，虚拟主播本质是偶像产业，那股诡异感则是我对台下一群人对着台上几个人狂热崇拜的场景感到恐惧。 在描述美的时候，郭德纲常用一想之美，你觉得这个人有多好看他就有多好看。偶像产业正是利用了这个原理，通过全方面的形象塑造让“粉丝”产生美好的幻想，形成近似宗教般的狂热。 此时的偶像“离神已经很近了”，如果作出与原本形象塑造不符的事，哪怕这件事在普通人中很普遍，也会破坏形象基础，由此产生的美好幻想也会如空中…
❤1
5 Jan 2026, 04:56 UTC867 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
过去的一年，我饱受失眠困扰，睡眠时间在5.5-6.5小时徘徊持续一周左右，又恢复正常（8—9小时）3-4天周而复始。 这使得我原本建立的生活：规律运动、饮食控制、阅读习惯被彻底摧毁，体重从最低72kg涨到最高78kg（目前回调至75kg），更新频道的内容更是力不从心。 为了解决失眠问题到医院开安眠药，但医生只给我开了“话疗处方”（小镇全科医生可能也没有权限），我此时便秘，开塞露不解决长期问题顺便看了，医生给我开了乳果糖并嘱咐一天喝1.5升水。 当晚我睡了10个小时，原本以为不过是又一轮的失眠循环，一周后我才敢确认失眠已经解决了，而原因是水摄入不足。
❤5😁2
4 Jan 2026, 12:48 UTC796 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
如果复制一个外形、性格、记忆都一样的我，那么他是否就是我？ 如果在复制的我诞生意识的那一刻，原本的我死去，那复制的我还是不是我？ 我死后很久，又被重新复制，那么这个我还是我吗？ 如果我失忆后重新认识社会，形成了一套完全不一样的世界观和性格，那当我找回记忆的时刻，之前的我和现在的我还是同一个人吗？ 现在的我和10年前的我性格、世界观都完全不同，这2个我还是同一个人吗？
❤4🤔4
25 Dec 2025, 10:20 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 6 August 2026
冷冻人体许诺未来科技进步可以解冻复活和宗教许诺存在转世轮回是一回事。 都是利用人们对死亡的恐惧，加上虚无缥缈的承诺进行诈骗，但受骗者却心甘情愿“万一呢？” 在真正面对死亡时，一切理智都显得微不足道。
8 Dec 2025, 04:12 UTC≈1,080 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
#反人类设计 微信公众号后台会将疑似广告消息折叠，但折叠≠已读，当你每一次打开私信时都会将其视为未读消息推送给你，直到你点展示。 这分明就是强提醒。
🌚1
11 Nov 2025, 11:15 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 6 August 2026
快递和外卖就该和电信运营商一样统一用一个固定号码外呼。 这样我就可以拒接所有陌生电话了。
19 Jul 2025, 17:47 UTC≈3,420 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
最近一段时间相继和老友们相见。 他们的外貌有很大变化，如果在大街上不期而遇，没有勇气上前询问，但能依稀看出记忆中模糊的样子。 他们的性格几乎没有变化，或者说是在原本基础上更甚了，并且在表达上多了一层圆滑。 古早的话题似乎永远也聊不完，谈论着曾经的人现在的样子。 但工作、生活将我们从地理上隔离，所带来的人际关系又取代了原本的情感链接。 导致熟悉中透着一股陌生的感觉，犹如鲁迅先生所说“我们之间已经隔了一层可悲的墙壁了。” 人类的情感联系必须通过朝夕相处来维持，这或许是人们往往认为爱情、亲情要超越友情的原因。 友情是最脆弱的，既没有亲情那血缘关系的“天经地义”也没有爱情那朝夕相处的理由。 一次换工作、一次转学、一次争吵亦或者他/她找男/女朋友，就足以摧毁友情的情感链接。 一直以来我对转校生非常不理解，他们能快速的和所有人打成一片，但所有人似乎又对他们都不重要。让我以为收获了挚友又被狠狠抛弃。 现在想来应是友情的情感…
😢11❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @juzhossn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 186,132 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“剧终的碎碎念” (@juzhossn), 993 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juzhossn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.