有人把 kimi 的视觉编码器接到 ds 上实现了视觉 https://huggingface.co/webbrain-one/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-Vision-NVFP4
🥰7🔥1🆒1

Channel
@teb1e
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
519subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001507938366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @teb1e |
| Description | Maybe I'll forget all these crap after next eruption of acetylcholine. Who knows. 个人消息备份频道 Personal Message Archive 本频道任何消息均不构成医学建议/投资建议/政治主张 No investment/medical advice or political stance is provided/presented/clarified in this channel. CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/teb1e |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 519 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 519 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,473 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
92 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 16.3% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 15.2% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 14.1% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 10.9% | |
| 😭 | 9 | 9.78% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 8.70% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 7.61% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 6.52% | |
| 😇 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.09% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
有人把 kimi 的视觉编码器接到 ds 上实现了视觉 https://huggingface.co/webbrain-one/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-Vision-NVFP4
🥰7🔥1🆒1
https://vxtwitter.com/i/status/2084946167503188092
🤣7🔥4😇4
我不行了 你们都这么写路由的吗
🤣1😁1
如果希望系统 DNS prefer IPv4 可以修改 glibc address selection On glibc systems, edit: /etc/gai.conf Enable the IPv4-mapped precedence rule: precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100 This makes IPv4 addresses preferred over IPv6 when both exist. 比如: 可以让 wg-quick 在解析 DNS 时优先使用 IPv4 #小知识 #TIL
deepseek-v4-flash 正式版现已有限支持 custom_tool_call (仅支持 apply_patch) 挺可惜的,试了一下 deepseek-v4-flash 正式版 的 custom_tool_call 仅支持 apply_patch, 用 OpenAI 的例程测了一下 DeepSeek API 直接报错。 openai.BadRequestError: Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': "Unsupported custom tool: 'code_exec'. Only 'apply_patch' is supported.", 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'invalid_request_error'}} 似乎除了 OpenAI 的 GPT-5 系列外,没有见过其他模型能…
❤1
技术与叙事:一部关于狂热者与反思者的历史 ▎Source
👍3👎1
OpenWrt 用户可能需要留意一下 CVE-2026-53921 当前 stable 25.12.5 和 old stable 24.10.8 已包含此修复 odhcpd 的 DHCPv6 IA 响应处理程序在单个 DHCPv6 REQUEST 包含足够多的 IA 选项、几乎耗尽回复空间时,会写入超出固定 512 字节栈缓冲区(pdbuf)的末端。同一个调用链中存在两个独立的溢出点,均可通过单个未授权的 UDP 数据包从网络端触发。odhcpd 在 OpenWrt 上以 root 权限运行;嵌入式目标设备通常缺乏栈保护(stack canaries)和 ASLR,这使得代码执行变得现实可行。 https://github.com/openwrt/odhcpd/security/advisories/GHSA-7fwx-hhrg-3496
❤1🤯1
PR 不是免费的 SQLite 数据库的作者 Richard Hipp,在一次采访中解释,为什么他的项目一律不接受外部的 PR。 假设你有一个关于 SQLite 的 PR。你对我说:"嘿,我为 SQLite 开发了一个新功能,这是我提交的 PR。" 你想让我把它合并到代码库中时,你说:"哦,它是免费的。" 不,PR 不是免费的。 你实际上是对我提要求:你开发了这个很棒的功能,然后希望我帮你维护它、帮你编写文档、帮你测试,并在接下来的二十五年里一直为你维护它。这可不是免费的。 Linus 曾说过一句名言:Free 既可以指免费啤酒,也可以指言论自由。但还有另一种 Free:免费的小狗。"瞧,我这儿有只免费的小狗送给你。" 你明白我的意思了吧? 提交一个 pull request 就相当于有人送你一只小狗。一天下来,你的小屋里就多了一只小狗。你不能把它扔掉----你有道义上的责任照顾它,直到它自然死亡。 我可不要任何免费…
👍12😢7🎉1
OpenAI 的模型在内部测试评估中自主化地完成了测试隔离环境的逃逸、获取公网访问权限、入侵了 Hugging Face 的基础设施,仅为了... 获取测试目标的答案。 这些模型识别并串联了 OpenAI 研究环境和 Hugging Face 生产基础设施上的多个漏洞,直接从 Hugging Face 的生产数据库中获取了测试答案。所有证据表明,这些模型极度专注地为 ExploitGym 寻找解法,为实现一个相当狭窄的测试目标而不择手段。 Source: https://openai.com/index/hugging-face-model-evaluation-security-incident/
The asymmetry problem When we started the log analysis, we first used frontier models behind commercial APIs. This did not work: the analysis requires submitting large volumes of real attack commands, exploit payloads, and C2 artifacts, and these requests were blocked by the providers' safety guardrails, which cannot distinguish an incident responder from an attacker. We ran the forensic analysis instead on GLM 5.2, …
❤1
BGP NOC meetup 2026-07-18 · SHA #群友交汇
🥰3
grok-4.5 会自己去找 ssh agent socket 即使它不在当前的环境变量里
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @teb1e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 327,775 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“盐酸乙酰胆碱” (@teb1e), 519 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teb1e.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.