title: CITWファンアート(SharpFFFFFFさんより) author: #ムームー@夢かき屋代表 tags: #DID #拘束 #緊縛 #サウンドノベル #オリジナル #水責め #クライシス・イン・ザ・ウォーター #くノ一 #女子高生 #ボールギャグ total_bookmarks: 3142 url: pixiv.net/i/82013274 bookmarked: True
Signed ChocolatePush

Channel
@PatriciaBySamHou
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003397450825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PatriciaBySamHou |
| Description | SamHou 的个人频道,用于公告+发好玩的。博客:https://blog.samhou.top |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PatriciaBySamHou |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 8 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 8 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 April 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
title: CITWファンアート(SharpFFFFFFさんより) author: #ムームー@夢かき屋代表 tags: #DID #拘束 #緊縛 #サウンドノベル #オリジナル #水責め #クライシス・イン・ザ・ウォーター #くノ一 #女子高生 #ボールギャグ total_bookmarks: 3142 url: pixiv.net/i/82013274 bookmarked: True
Signed ChocolatePush
title: カナン author: #姜シュカ tags: #女の子 #タイツ #高潔カナン total_bookmarks: 520 url: pixiv.net/i/145043730 bookmarked: True
Signed ChocolatePush
title: お誘い地雷系チノちゃん♡ author: #チノマロン🌰 tags: #ご注文はうさぎですか? #ごちうさ #香風智乃 #チノ #吊りスカート total_bookmarks: 1094 url: pixiv.net/i/142805871 bookmarked: True
Signed ChocolatePush
title: うちの子 author: #みけもち tags: #オリジナル #女の子 #パーカー #ツインテール #OC #うちの子 #スニーカー total_bookmarks: 202 url: pixiv.net/i/145163553 bookmarked: True
Signed ChocolatePush
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🙈
source
title: こっちに来ませんか? author: #TwinBox tags: #TwinBox学園 #前田栞 #水着 #おっぱい #お腹 #女の子 #腋 #おへそ #剥ぎ取りたいブラ total_bookmarks: 8318 url: pixiv.net/i/120535916 bookmarked: True
Signed ChocolatePush
2026 Linux 重置密码教程大全 - Dirty Cow (CVE-2016-5195) - Dirty Pipe (CVE-2022-0847) - io_uring UAF (CVE-2022-2602) - Copy Fail (CVE-2026-31431) - io_uring ZCRX freelist (CVE-2026-43121) - Dirty Frag (CVE-2026-43284 CVE-2026-43500) - Fragnesia (CVE-2026-46300)
我给你最直接、最真相、最不绕弯、最硬核、最干脆、最不墨迹、最戳痛点、最不留情面、最一针见血、最开门见山、最单刀直入、最不铺垫、最不客套、最不煽情、最不拐弯、最有效、最狠、最准、最稳、最利落、最霸道、最硬核、最不搞形式、最不整虚头巴脑、最只讲干货、最只说重点、最只给结果、最只聊真相、最核心、最关键的方式来告诉你 “我 100% 确定”,给你最终版本, 给你最终无bug版本,保证100%无错,保证100%解决,100%准确,100%最终结论: 我不知道
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PatriciaBySamHou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DEV Save & Load 🤯” (@PatriciaBySamHou), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PatriciaBySamHou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.