群组入群自动验证bot服务现已恢复,您可以重试入群。 带来的不便,我们深表歉意。
🥰72

Channel
@cemiuiler_release
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,262subscribers
+1,621 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001901751697 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cemiuiler_release |
| Description | Official Website: https://hyperceiler.sevtinge.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cemiuiler_release |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 21:17 | 27,262 | +106 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:01 | 27,156 | +127 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 21:55 | 27,029 | +300 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 26,729 | +67 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 26,662 | +20 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 26,642 | +38 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 26,604 | +58 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 26,546 | +63 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 26,483 | +81 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:19 | 26,402 | +47 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:43 | 26,355 | +33 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:06 | 26,322 | +36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 26,286 | +32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 26,254 | +24 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 26,230 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 26,215 | +24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 26,191 | +30 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 26,161 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 26,145 | +27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 26,118 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4,467 reactions across 18 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 1,619 | 36.2% | |
| 😭 | 1,464 | 32.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 387 | 8.66% | |
| 👍 | 275 | 6.16% | |
| ❤ | 155 | 3.47% | |
| 🤩 | 123 | 2.75% | |
| 👌 | 89 | 1.99% | |
| 😁 | 51 | 1.14% | |
| 🤯 | 42 | 0.94% | |
| 🤬 | 41 | 0.918% | |
| 🤣 | 37 | 0.828% | |
| 🆒 | 25 | 0.56% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 0.537% | |
| 😨 | 24 | 0.537% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 0.403% | |
| 😡 | 14 | 0.313% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 0.269% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 0.246% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 0.224% | |
| 😇 | 9 | 0.201% | |
| 10 further kinds | 37 | 0.828% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,467 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2025 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cemiuiler_release. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2025 to 8 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
群组入群自动验证bot服务现已恢复,您可以重试入群。 带来的不便,我们深表歉意。
🥰72
感谢您使用 HyperCeiler。 本次更新优化了 HyperCeiler 的 UI 和视觉效果,新增了许多非常实用的功能,并修复和对 HyperOS 3.0/3.0.300 Android 16 适配了大部分的现有功能。 以下是您可能感兴趣的更新内容: - 新增了用户引导页面,更加方便的自定义您的 HyperCeiler; - 更新 Miuix,使视觉效果与 HyperOS 3 设计语言语言一致; - 优化搜索,现在您可以更加流畅、快速和直观的搜索 HyperCeiler 功能; - 部分本地内容改为使用云端内容,减少本地冗杂信息存储; - 升级 Xposed API 至 101,现在作用域与首页显示内容布局同步,更实用,更清爽; - 舍弃 XSharedPreference 并使用全新的配置存储逻辑; - 舍弃使用 prop 存储 HyperCeiler 内容,避免一些过时且无用的检测; - 对 HyperOS 3.0…
🥰198
我们更新了《HyperCeiler 用户协议》,请及时查看。若您继续使用 HyperCeiler 提供的服务则代表您同意上述内容及其更改。
🥰120
HyperCeiler 2023 - 2026 一路同行,新年快乐
🥰310
关于第三方侵权行为的公告 我们注意到,近期存在第三方在未经授权的情况下,对 HyperCeiler 源码进行修改后进行商业分发而未遵守 The GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (AGPL-3.0) (以下简称“开源协议”) 的源代码公开义务,已构成侵权行为。 在此明确声明: 《HyperCeiler 用户协议》(以下简称“协议”)并未授权任何用户,包括个人、组织或企业,在未获得授权的情况下绕过开源协议对本软件进行商业性销售、预装、捆绑或其他商业分发。 如需进行商业性的销售、复制和散发,必须事先取得绀漓丨Sevtinge 和/或 Re.chronoRain的书面授权。 未按开源协议要求公开全部对应源代码即进行商业分发的行为,已违反协议并侵犯我方权利,损害用户权益,造成不良影响。 我方已对相关侵权行为展开调查并固定证据,保留依法追究行为人法律责任的权利。 若您正在使用来源不…
🥰172
HyperCeiler 的翻译服务已由 Crowdin 正式迁移至 Hosted Weblate。 请所有贡献者使用以下平台进行翻译贡献: https://hosted.weblate.org/engage/hyperceiler/ 自本公告发布起,Crowdin 平台不再接受任何新增翻译内容。
🥰3
Android 14 已替换,修复了一些已知问题
🥰62
已发布 2.6.163 预览版更新 此版本仍在测试阶段,如遇到问题请在本评论区上提交反馈 注: - 预览版的功能仍有可能变动,届时请以正式发布为准 - 仅支持 Android 15 - Android 16,Android 14 请下载文件名称为 Android 14 的版本 - 请勿下载错误版本,带来的问题概不负责 - 请戳蓝字(超链接)
🥰83
已发布 2.6.162 预览版更新 此版本仍在测试阶段,仅供尝鲜使用,如遇到问题请在 GitHub Issues 上提交反馈 注: - 预览版的功能仍有可能变动,届时请以正式发布为准 - 仅支持 Android 15 - Android 16 - 请戳蓝字(超链接)
🥰41
请勿从任何第三方渠道下载和使用 HyperCeiler,第三方下载渠道提供的 HyperCeiler 可能包含恶意内容,由此造成的后果包括但不限于信息泄露、财产损失我们概不负责。 截至目前为止,HyperCeiler 不需要任何网络访问,若您下载的 HyperCeiler 需要网络访问且打包日期早于该公告发送时间,请立刻卸载此 HyperCeiler 并将样本发送至 @Sevtinge_PM_Bot 。 HyperCeiler 官方下载渠道: - HyperCeiler 官网 - Telegram 频道 - GitHub - LSPosed 模块仓库 - Bilibili@绀漓丨Sevtinge
👌65🥰11❤7🤯3🤣1😁1😐1
Disable Rescue Party Plus 1.0.100_20250911(100) by Sevtinge - First release: prevent MIUI 14 - HyperOS 3 from delete app data when crash many of times. CRC32 8e3780e9
🥰61❤25👍20
优化 其他-解锁剪贴板数量限制;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 系统框架-其他-允许卸载部分预装 App;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 系统界面-其他-解锁超大音量;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 互联互通服务-解锁 Xiaomi HyperMind;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 相册-解锁 AI 写真;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 相册-解锁文字烟花;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 相册-解锁魔法消除;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 相册-解锁魔法换天;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 小米相册编辑-解锁大师滤镜;(@lingqiqi5211) 移除 智能助理-Pad/Fold 小部件;(@lingqiqi5211) 应用: 新增 用户协议同意;(@Sevtinge, @Fan095) 新增 应用崩溃异常追踪自检页;(@HChenX, @Sevtinge, @lingqiq…
🥰127❤26🔥6🎉3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cemiuiler_release. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cemiuiler_release named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HyperCeiler | Release & Notice” (@cemiuiler_release), 27,262 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cemiuiler_release.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.