https://www.bilibili.com/video/av116804454191152 = BV1WFjd6BEe2

Channel
/var/log/ciel
@var_log_ciel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,110subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001206981716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @var_log_ciel |
| Created | 27 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/var_log_ciel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 1,110 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 1,111 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 1,111 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 31 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
212 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 34 | 16.0% | |
| 😭 | 31 | 14.6% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 13.2% | |
| 😇 | 27 | 12.7% | |
| 😐 | 25 | 11.8% | |
| 🌚 | 18 | 8.49% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 8.02% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 4.72% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 3.77% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 1.42% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.943% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.472% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.472% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.472% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2025 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://soaked.in/2026/06/deng/ 文章分享
👍11
十年前的今天
🤣15
现代的密码管理器如果遵循最佳实践,服务器被黑是不会造成特别大损害的,只要你的主密码不泄露,密码库仍然是无法解密的。 现在真正的安全硬仗集中到了客户端的供应链安全,客户端是唯一一个能接触到全部解密数据的环节,一旦客户端被渗透,后果就是不堪设想。
❤7
🔴 Bitwarden CLI 2026.4.0 被骇;请尽快更新并检查设备数据及修改密码(若适用)。 - 请更新至 Bitwarden CLI 2026.4.1 或 降级至 2026.3.0。 - 这是 Bitwarden 的官方 CLI(难用的那个),和第三方 CLI rbw 无关。 - 骇客似乎通过 GitHub Actions 潜入了 Bitwarden 的 CI/CD pipeline。 - 根据 Socket 分析,被骇软件的恶意行为包括收集系统凭据并将其加密发布到公开 GitHub repo 中,但不会在 locale 为 ru 的系统发作。 https://socket.dev/blog/bitwarden-cli-compromised seealso: HackerNews:47876043 linksrc: https://t.me/microblock_pub/2573 #Bitwarden #E…
又到了植树节!想和大家一起再种一颗 tgcn 频道树🌳!(这次有更多功能可以玩哦~) 这里是 /var/log/ciel,是 @azaneko 的树枝 🌿 在频道树的第 2 层~ (如果你也有公开频道,想成为这个频道的树叶的话,就点击下面的「成为树叶」吧! > <)
❤2🥰1
起床一看发现马逆进🍊了,而且居然不是被哪个老朋友搞了,是因为嘴了一句霸王茶姬,这下优化营商环境了。令人不由得想起数年前,谭秦东一句“来自天堂的毒药”,被鸿毛药酒跨省抓捕的事情。 马逆说很多奶茶咖啡因含量很高,是“准毒品”,我认为是有欠公允,但尚可接受的。一瓶 500mL 的可乐大约含有 60mg 咖啡因,一杯咖啡大概 100mg 多一些,一罐魔爪 165mg 。马逆提到的霸王茶姬,标称含量其实差不多也就 100mg 多些,并没有显著的高,只是平时人们不太把这类饮品和咖啡因关联起来。 实际上在人类漫长的历史中,烟、酒、茶、咖啡等等在不同地方不同时期流行过的的东西,都多多少少含有一些精神活性物质,这也是人类种群在对抗自然环境和辛苦劳作中,为自我保存而进化出来的习惯。这些东西都有个剂量的问题,毒品的本质也是精神活性物质,具体范围也不断在更新,合法饮料也不是完全没有成瘾性,多了少了怎么算谁又能说清。 大量咖啡因是否应该称为准毒品是…
😐19👀3👍2
Anthropic 和 OpenAI 在这两天分别发布了报告描述自家平台是如何对抗外国敌对势力和公司对自家平台的滥用的 其中,Anthropic 的报告指出他们通过追踪元数据,成功识别了 DeepSeek,Moonshot AI 和 Minimax 对他家模型的蒸馏,甚至能准确溯源到特定的实验室人员和公司高级员工 OpenAI 的报告则更为详细,不仅指出有中国网络战人员使用 OpenAI 的产品,还详细描述了他们输入的内容和进行的操作,例如对高市早苗进行舆论攻击以及在 Twitter 上攻击“李老师不是你老师”等账号 防止自家的服务被滥用是天经地义的,但是这里有一个问题: Anthropic 和 OpenAI 不仅看了用户的聊天内容,用聊天内容和元数据对用户做了大数据分析,还把聊天和分析的内容公之于众 换句话说,用户在这些平台上并没有什么隐私——平台可以随意查看和审查你的聊天内容,根据他们的道德和价值观主观评判内容的好…
😐6😢3
不得不升了 26.2 ,感觉跟吃了苍蝇一样。 扑面而来的巨大圆角已经不止是圆角了,返回键干脆圆了,长条元素两端也彻底是圆的了!视觉点击面积又变小了! 我现在感觉我的主屏幕笼罩着一层诡异的白色,每个应用也都被加了一圈白色的描边。文件夹的液态玻璃彻底消灭了对比度,看不清文件夹里面的图标不说,一滑动起来还水波粼粼的!我真是服了! 开关形状改了,动效跟多动症似的!控制中心展开更是要集体弹跳一下!整个设计充斥着各种各样人为添加的噪音,竭尽全力地展示自己没用的工作量,在 Apple 设计可以不活但不能没活是吧。 恍惚间让人好像回到了那个魔改 Win XP 美化主题的时代,但是那个时候怎么调,至少还是用户说了算的。再这样搞下去真要换安卓了!
😇27
每次到年底各种 APP 的年度总结,我总能准确无误地测出它们每天的最后一分钟是凌晨几点。。
🌚18
已严肃品尝绿猫袜子
🔥17❤1🍓1
https://downdetector.com/ https://downdetectorsdowndetector.com/ https://downdetectorsdowndetectorsdowndetector.com/ https://downdetectorsdowndetectorsdowndetectorsdowndetector.com/ 没有下一个套娃了,因为域名中每段 label 最长 63 字符。
🤣19🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @var_log_ciel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 458,127 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“/var/log/ciel” (@var_log_ciel), 1,110 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/var_log_ciel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.